DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

AMZN vs AZYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs94
Total AUM$11.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AZYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

AMZNAZYY
Full nameAmazon.com, Inc.GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$249.99 as of July 21, 2026$15.22 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield34.18%
Distribution Safety Score™ 48
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$3.02M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)
ObjectiveOperates as an online retailer and web services provider. Segments include North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform.Seeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Amazon, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A09/16/2025
Beta1.4611.0365
Last dividend$0.1000
Ex-dividend date07/17/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMZN if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose AZYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 34.18%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: AZYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while AMZN keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AZYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.9% against 30.9% for AMZN. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Sep 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZN10.37%6.81%30.9%0.110.16-21.7%
AZYY-5.14%-13.02%20.9%-1.01-1.27-23.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Sep 2025” measures every fund from September 16, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Sep 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Sep 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

AZYY currently shows a 34.18% distribution yield. AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZN has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while AZYY would produce $284.83/month, at current distribution rates.

AMZN yield
AZYY yield34.18%

Cost & efficiency

AZYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio — roughly $1,070 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). AMZN is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

AZYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

AMZN is a stock, while AZYY tracks Amazon (AMZN). Beta is 1.461 for AMZN and 1.0365 for AZYY, indicating AZYY is less volatile relative to the market.

AMZN beta1.461
AZYY beta1.0365

Security details

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock. AZYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 09/16/2025) with $3.02M in assets.

AZYY AUM$3.02M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Which of AMZN or AZYY pays more dividend income?

AZYY currently reports a distribution yield, while AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between AMZN and AZYY?

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN). They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both AMZN and AZYY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, AMZN or AZYY?

AZYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio. AMZN is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZN vs AZYY generate?

At current rates, AMZN has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in AZYY would produce about $284.83 per month ($3,418.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZN or AZYY?

AZYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.9% against 30.9% for AMZN. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZN vs AZYY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

AMZN is the Amazon stock itself—a large-cap e-commerce and cloud computing company that has never paid a dividend. AZYY is a new ETF that wraps Amazon shares and systematically sells weekly put spreads on leveraged Amazon ETFs to generate income. The key distinction: AMZN offers zero cash income but full upside exposure; AZYY manufactures a 34.80% distribution yield through options strategies but carries structural complexity, concentration risk, and a 1.07% annual fee.

How they differ

AMZN is a direct equity stake in the company; AZYY is a packaged options overlay applied to Amazon exposure. The biggest difference is income: AMZN returns nothing to shareholders unless they sell; AZYY distributes 34.80% annually via weekly payouts funded by selling puts on leveraged Amazon-tracking ETFs, not Amazon itself. Second, AZYY's beta of 1.0365 reflects the collar structure's dampening effect, while AMZN's higher 1.461 beta captures pure stock volatility. Third, AZYY charges 1.07% in annual fees and operates with minimal scale ($3.37M AUM as of its September 2025 inception), whereas AMZN has no expense ratio. AZYY's strategy also introduces options risk—the fund is only five months old, so the sustainability of its weekly distribution formula has no track record during a rising, flat, or falling market cycle.

Who each is best for

AMZN: Fits investors seeking pure capital appreciation in a major cloud and e-commerce operator, with no income need and a longer time horizon to absorb equity market volatility.

AZYY: Designed for income-focused investors who want weekly cash flow from Amazon exposure and accept options-based leverage, elevated fees, and the risk that distributions may consume principal if underlying Amazon volatility or leveraged ETF performance underperforms the options premium collected.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution rates. A 34.80% annualized yield is achieved through put spreads on leveraged ETFs, not Amazon dividends or underlying appreciation. If Amazon declines sharply or implied volatility collapses, the fund may struggle to collect enough premium to sustain distributions, likely forcing NAV to decline to fund payouts.
  • Leverage and options decay. AZYY sells puts on leveraged Amazon ETFs, not Amazon directly. Leveraged products experience daily rebalancing drag in choppy markets, and if the underlying leveraged ETFs underperform, the premium AZYY collects may prove insufficient relative to the risk taken.
  • Single-asset concentration. Both securities are 100% exposed to Amazon. However, AZYY compounds this through a leveraged options overlay; a 20% Amazon decline would pressure the fund's ability to generate weekly income while AMZN would simply decline proportionally.
  • Early-stage fund risk. AZYY's inception was September 2025; it has no performance history across a full market cycle or volatility regime. The weekly distribution sustainability is untested in drawdown conditions.
  • Liquidity and operational risk. At $3.37M AUM, AZYY is extremely small and may face redemption pressures or closure if assets don't grow; bid-ask spreads are likely to remain wide, raising transaction costs.

Bottom line

If you want exposure to Amazon with no income requirement and accept equity volatility, AMZN is straightforward. If you prioritize weekly cash flow and accept the complexity and risks of options-based income generation, AZYY offers a yield premium—but only if the options collar can sustain distributions across a market downturn or volatility shock. Past performance, especially over just five months, does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.