DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

AMZN vs AZYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 8, 2026

Best for

  • AMZNInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
  • AZYYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 35.75%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

ETFs92
Total AUM$11.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AZYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

AMZNAZYY
Full nameAmazon.com, Inc.GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$274.48 as of August 8, 2026$14.43 as of August 8, 2026
Distribution yield35.75%
Distribution Safety Score™ 48
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$2.90M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)
ObjectiveOperates as an online retailer and web services provider. Segments include North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform.Seeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Amazon, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A09/16/2025
Beta1.4541.0365
Last dividend$0.0992
Ex-dividend date08/07/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMZN if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose AZYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 35.75%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: AZYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while AMZN keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AMZN has outpaced AZYY over the year to date, posting a 21.18% total return against -5.71%. AZYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.5% against 34.7% for AMZN. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Sep 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZN21.18%17.27%34.7%0.390.61-21.7%
AZYY-5.71%-13.54%20.5%-1.02-1.27-23.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Sep 2025” measures every fund from September 16, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Sep 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Sep 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

AZYY currently shows a 35.75% distribution yield. AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZN has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while AZYY would produce $297.92/month, at current distribution rates.

AMZN yield
AZYY yield35.75%

Cost & efficiency

AZYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio — roughly $1,070 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). AMZN is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

AZYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

AMZN is a stock, while AZYY tracks Amazon (AMZN). Beta is 1.454 for AMZN and 1.0365 for AZYY, indicating AZYY is less volatile relative to the market.

AMZN beta1.454
AZYY beta1.0365

Security details

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock. AZYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 09/16/2025) with $2.90M in assets.

AZYY AUM$2.90M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Which of AMZN or AZYY pays more dividend income?

AZYY currently reports a distribution yield, while AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between AMZN and AZYY?

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AZYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST AMZN ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN). They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both AMZN and AZYY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, AMZN or AZYY?

AZYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio. AMZN is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZN vs AZYY generate?

At current rates, AMZN has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in AZYY would produce about $297.92 per month ($3,575.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZN or AZYY?

AMZN has outpaced AZYY over the year to date, posting a 21.18% total return against -5.71%. AZYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 20.5% against 34.7% for AMZN. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZN vs AZYY — at a glance

Generated August 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

AMZN is Amazon's common stock—a large-cap equity stake in the e-commerce and cloud-computing giant. AZYY is a newly launched ETF that tracks Amazon's price but wraps it in an options-income strategy: it sells weekly put spreads (a defined-risk options collar) on leveraged Amazon ETFs to generate income, targeting a 33.86% annualized yield.

How they differ

The core difference is income generation versus capital appreciation. AMZN pays no dividend and is structured for buy-and-hold equity investors; AZYY explicitly harvests options premium through weekly put spread sales on leveraged exposure to create income. AZYY's 1.07% expense ratio and options trading activity sit atop the underlying Amazon stock; AMZN carries no fund expenses. Most critically, AZYY's 33.86% distribution rate relies on options income rather than business fundamentals, meaning the fund's NAV is likely eroding—a dynamic that typically becomes more pronounced if implied volatility on Amazon falls or if the stock rallies past the put spreads' strike prices. AZYY's beta of 1.0365 is tighter than AMZN's 1.461, a consequence of the put collar dampening downside participation. AZYY is also tiny ($2.90M AUM) and brand-new (inception September 2025), adding liquidity and track-record risk.

Who each is best for

AMZN: Fits investors seeking direct ownership of Amazon's business—cloud services growth, retail scale, and operating leverage—without income pressure. Suits longer time horizons and portfolio cores where capital appreciation is the priority.

AZYY: Designed for investors prioritizing weekly income over capital preservation who are comfortable with leveraged options exposure and willing to accept NAV decay in exchange for a high current yield. Fits tactical allocations with short time horizons or traders comfortable rotating into and out of the position.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at 33.86% yield: A distribution rate this high, paid from options premium rather than business cash flow, almost always implies the fund's net asset value declines over time as the underlying equity return fails to offset distributions. This is especially acute if implied volatility on Amazon compresses or the stock rallies steadily.
  • Leveraged options collar risk: AZYY sells put spreads on leveraged Amazon ETFs, not Amazon stock itself. If the leveraged ETF underperforms Amazon (as often happens due to daily reset decay), the fund's income generation and hedging effectiveness both degrade.
  • Extreme liquidity and track-record risk: With $2.90M AUM and an inception date of September 2025, AZYY has virtually no operating history. Bid-ask spreads may widen sharply, and the fund's ability to function in stressed markets is untested. Early redemptions could force disadvantageous options unwinds.
  • Beta mismatch and capped upside: AZYY's put spread collar caps gains if Amazon rallies sharply; the lower beta reflects this truncated participation. Investors paying for weekly income may miss sustained equity advances.

Bottom line

AMZN offers direct ownership and full upside participation; AZYY trades that upside for weekly income via an options strategy that likely erodes principal over time. If you want Amazon exposure and don't need income, AMZN is straightforward; if you need high current yield and can tolerate (or expect) NAV decay, AZYY's structure is built for that—but verify the trade-off is worth the illiquidity, minimal fund history, and leverage complexity. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.