DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

BABA vs BABO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 24, 2026

ETFs59
Total AUM$9.14B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BABO.

Side-by-side snapshot

BABABABO
Full nameAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMax
Last Close$112.14 as of July 24, 2026$8.07 as of July 24, 2026
Distribution yield1.16%52.84%
Distribution Safety Score™ 6346
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$14.7M
Distribution frequencyAnnualWeekly
Underlying indexAlibaba (BABA)
ObjectiveCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A09/14/2023
Beta0.496
Last dividend$1.0500$0.0820
Ex-dividend date06/11/202607/23/2026

Bottom lineChoose BABA if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose BABO if you want to maximize current income — roughly 52.84%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: BABO's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BABA keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BABA has lagged BABO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -8.52% total return against -7.76%. Measured from Aug 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BABA has compounded at 19.08% a year versus 7.70% for BABO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Aug 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BABA-28.00%-8.52%19.08%44.3%-0.30-0.48-49.9%
BABO-25.04%-7.76%7.70%36.3%-0.35-0.52-42.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 24, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Aug 2024” measures every fund from August 8, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

BABO offers the higher yield at 52.84% vs 1.16% for BABA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BABA would generate roughly $9.67/month, while BABO would produce $440.33/month, at current distribution rates.

BABA yield1.16%
BABO yield52.84%
Monthly diff on $10K$430.67

Cost & efficiency

BABO charges a 1.00% expense ratio — roughly $1,000 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). BABA is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

BABO ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

BABA is a stock, while BABO tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a covered call approach.

BABA beta0.496
BABO beta

Security details

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock. BABO is managed by YieldMax (launched 09/14/2023) with $14.7M in assets.

BABO AUM$14.7M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Is BABA or BABO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BABO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BABA and BABO?

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BABO (YieldMax BABA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a covered call approach. They are issued by — and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both BABA and BABO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BABA or BABO?

BABO charges a 1.00% expense ratio. BABA is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in BABA vs BABO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BABA would generate roughly $9.67 per month ($116.00 annually). The same in BABO would produce about $440.33 per month ($5,284.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BABA or BABO?

BABA has lagged BABO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -8.52% total return against -7.76%. Measured from Aug 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — BABA has compounded at 19.08% a year versus 7.70% for BABO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BABA vs BABO — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BABA is a direct equity holding in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd., a Chinese e-commerce and cloud-services conglomerate. BABO is a covered-call ETF that holds Alibaba shares and systematically sells call options against them to generate income. The key distinction: BABA offers core equity exposure with a modest 1.24% annual dividend, while BABO wraps that same underlying asset in an options strategy designed to produce weekly distributions yielding 37.96% annually.

How they differ

The fundamental difference is structure and income strategy. BABA is the direct stock—you own Alibaba equity with its operational earnings reinvested or returned as dividends. BABO holds Alibaba but overlays a covered-call strategy, selling call options weekly to harvest option premium. This generates the dramatic yield gap: BABA's 1.24% annual distribution versus BABO's 37.96%.

The second difference is distribution frequency and composition. BABA pays annually; BABO distributes weekly, with a significant portion of those payments likely return of capital rather than earned income given the yield level. BABO charges a 1.00% expense ratio on top of the option-writing costs embedded in its NAV.

The third difference is capital appreciation potential and volatility. BABA has a reported beta of 0.496, suggesting it moves about half as much as the broader market. BABO's beta is not reported, but the covered-call overlay systematically caps upside—sold calls will be exercised if Alibaba rallies sharply, capping your participation. BABO also carries significantly smaller assets ($15.4M) and is much newer (inception September 2023), introducing liquidity and track-record risk.

Who each is best for

BABA: Fits investors seeking direct equity exposure to a mature Chinese tech firm with stable earnings, lower volatility relative to the market, and a modest annual dividend as a secondary income component alongside potential long-term capital appreciation.

BABO: Fits investors prioritizing current income over capital growth, comfortable accepting capped upside in exchange for weekly cash flow, and able to tolerate the tax inefficiency and NAV erosion risk inherent in a high-yield covered-call strategy on a single underlying.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at 37.96% yields. Distributions this high cannot be sustained from Alibaba's underlying earnings alone; a substantial portion will be return of capital, gradually eroding the fund's net asset value over time. Investors receive cash but lose principal on paper.
  • Call cap on upside. The covered-call overlay caps capital appreciation. If Alibaba rallies significantly, sold calls will be exercised and shares called away at a capped price, locking in losses relative to an uncovered holding.
  • Concentration and single-stock risk. Both securities are fully exposed to Alibaba's business risk—regulatory pressure in China, e-commerce competition, cloud-services margin compression. BABO's entire portfolio is a single stock; diversification risk is extreme.
  • Fund size and liquidity. BABO's $15.4M in assets under management is small, raising questions about liquidity on exits and the fund's long-term viability. The ETF is also less than one year old, with no multi-year performance history.
  • Weekly option-writing volatility and tax drag. BABO's weekly option rolls create frequent turnover, generating short-term capital gains (taxed at ordinary income rates) and reinvestment timing risk. The 1.00% expense ratio does not fully capture the economic cost of the options program.

Bottom line

If you value steady long-term equity exposure with modest dividend income and lower-than-market volatility, BABA's direct ownership offers simplicity and tax efficiency. If you prioritize current cash flow and accept capped capital upside on a single-stock concentration, BABO's covered-call approach delivers it—though the 37.96% yield signals a trade of principal preservation for income, a shift worth verifying against your horizon and tax situation. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.