DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DRMP vs KMEM: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF and Kurv Memory Select ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 16, 2026

No track record yet. DRMP, KMEM launched within the last six months. Where a fund has not published a payout, the forward distribution rate is left blank.

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

DRMP has outpaced KMEM over the year to date, posting a -32.57% total return against -33.76%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulativeSince Jul 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DRMP-32.57%-36.81%76.7%-2.06-2.65-37.4%
KMEM-33.76%-33.76%82.0%-1.74-2.27-37.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 1, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jul 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jul 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricDRMPKMEM
Forward distribution rate39.94%—
Trailing 12-month yield14.95%—
30-day SEC yield0.00%—

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Not a distribution payer

KMEM (Kurv Memory Select ETF) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. KMEM is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDRMPKMEM
Full nameTuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETFKurv Memory Select ETF
IssuerTuttle Capital ManagementKurv
Last Close$16.93 as of October 16, 2026$15.31 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate39.94%—
Trailing 12-month yield14.95%—
30-day SEC yield0.00%—
Distribution Safety Score™ 50—
Expense ratio0.95%0.65%
AUM$5.21M$28.0M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyNone
Underlying indexActively managed (no tracked index recorded)Basket (Memory Semiconductor Stocks)
ObjectiveActively managed, non-diversified ETF seeking current income. Under normal market conditions the fund invests at least 80% of its net assets in equity securities of memory-stack companies (memory semiconductor and related supply-chain firms) and instruments providing economically equivalent exposure, while generating income through a systematic put credit spread strategy on memory semiconductor-related securities, ETFs, and indexes. Distributes net investment income weekly.Kurv Memory Select ETF seeks to provide targeted exposure to the companies dominating memory chip production.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/11/202606/30/2026
Last dividend$0.13—
Ex-dividend date10/09/2026—

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because KMEM launched June 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: DRMP launched June 2026 and KMEM launched June 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — KMEM charges 0.65% against 0.95% for DRMP, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. DRMP generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs16
Total AUM$1.29B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Tuttle Capital Management operates a focused lineup of 7 ETFs that emphasize thematic investing and income-focused strategies. The firm's offerings span specialized areas including cryptocurrency exposure (BITK), photography and imaging (FOTO), and sector-specific themes like healthcare (HALX) and technology (MSTK), alongside income-oriented products under their Income and Income Blast families. The issuer targets investors seeking unconventional thematic strategies rather than broad-based index exposure, with notable tickers like MAGO and SPCI rounding out their niche-oriented portfolio.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DRMP.

ETFs16
Total AUM$649M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Kurv is known for developing actively managed, single-stock and thematic covered call ETFs that generate income through options strategies. The issuer's lineup spans fixed income, growth and income, precious metals strategies, and thematic investing approaches, with a notable focus on single-stock income products tied to mega-cap technology and consumer companies. Kurv's breadth includes both traditional covered call strategies and more specialized offerings in metals and sector-specific themes, appealing to investors seeking equity income across various market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on KMEM.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DRMP (Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF) and KMEM (Kurv Memory Select ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

DRMP currently shows a 39.94% distribution yield. KMEM has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

KMEM is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.65% compared to 0.95%.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DRMP would generate roughly $76.81 cash per distribution, while KMEM has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

DRMP yield39.94%
KMEM yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DRMP would cost approximately $950 in fees vs $650 for KMEM (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DRMP ER0.95%
KMEM ER0.65%

Strategy & risk

DRMP is an actively managed ETF built around technology exposure, while KMEM tracks Basket (Memory Semiconductor Stocks) with an artificial intelligence (ai) approach.

Fund details

DRMP is managed by Tuttle Capital Management (launched 06/11/2026) with $5.21M in assets. KMEM is managed by Kurv (launched 06/30/2026) with $28.0M in assets.

DRMP AUM$5.21M
KMEM AUM$28.0M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of DRMP or KMEM pays more dividend income?

DRMP currently reports a distribution yield, while KMEM has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between DRMP and KMEM?

DRMP (Tuttle Capital Memory Stack Income Blast ETF) is an actively managed ETF built around technology exposure, while KMEM (Kurv Memory Select ETF) tracks Basket (Memory Semiconductor Stocks) with an artificial intelligence (ai) approach. They are issued by Tuttle Capital Management and Kurv respectively.

Can I hold both DRMP and KMEM?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, DRMP or KMEM?

DRMP has an expense ratio of 0.95% while KMEM charges 0.65%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DRMP vs KMEM generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DRMP would generate roughly $76.81 cash per distribution ($3,994.00 annually). KMEM does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate.

Which has performed better historically, DRMP or KMEM?

DRMP has outpaced KMEM over the year to date, posting a -32.57% total return against -33.76%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare DRMP with

People also compare KMEM with

Popular comparisons

DRMP vs KMEM — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

DRMP and KMEM are both equity ETFs focused on memory semiconductor companies, but they pursue fundamentally different strategies. DRMP is an actively managed fund that holds memory-stack equities while generating income through systematic put credit spreads on memory-related securities—distributing 39.94% weekly. KMEM is a passive basket tracker of memory chip producers with no stated distribution strategy and a simpler fee structure.

How they differ

The core distinction is income generation method. DRMP layers options strategies (put spreads) on top of equity holdings to produce a 39.94% distribution rate, while KMEM holds equities without an options overlay and reports no distribution rate. This makes DRMP a synthetic-income vehicle and KMEM a traditional thematic equity tracker.

DRMP charges 0.95% versus 0.65% for KMEM, a 0.3% gap that reflects DRMP's active management and options infrastructure. On asset size, KMEM holds $28.0M compared to DRMP's $5.21M, giving KMEM a larger base, though both remain modest. Both inception dates fall in mid-2026, so fund track records are extremely limited.

Who each is best for

  • DRMP: Fits investors pursuing high current income from memory-semiconductor exposure who are comfortable with options-derived payouts and can tolerate the mechanics and risks of put-spread strategies. Appropriate for those seeking weekly cash distributions from a concentrated thematic allocation.
  • KMEM: Fits investors who want pure memory-chip exposure without income-generation mechanics and prefer lower fees over regular distributions. Designed for those viewing memory semiconductors as a thematic growth holding rather than an income source. If the underlying memory-stock holdings do not appreciate sufficiently or the put spreads lose value, the fund may erode net asset value to sustain distributions.
  • Put-spread assignment and liquidity mismatch. DRMP's credit-spread strategy creates the possibility of assignment on short puts, forcing equity purchases at strike prices. If liquidity in memory-chip names tightens or implied volatility spikes, the fund may face margin calls or forced liquidation to meet put obligations.
  • Concentration in memory semiconductors. Both funds are non-diversified thematic vehicles focused entirely on memory-chip production. If the memory sector faces cyclical downturns, supply-chain disruptions, or commoditization pressure, holders lack diversification to offset losses.
  • Limited track record and fund age. Both ETFs launched in mid-2026, meaning performance and behavior data span weeks to a few months. Investor experience through a market downturn, volatility spike, or semiconductor cycle shift is unknown for both vehicles. Both funds are young with minimal operating history, so the differences in their structure and track record matter for your decision. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.