DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IAU vs IAUI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Gold Trust and NEOS Gold High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • IAUInvestors who want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress.
  • IAUIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 12.09%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IAU has outpaced IAUI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 35.01% total return against 19.40%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — IAU has compounded at 27.54% a year versus 16.56% for IAUI. IAUI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 28.8% for IAU. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IAU4.02%35.01%27.54%28.8%0.891.18-26.4%
IAUI-0.54%19.40%16.56%22.4%0.590.79-22.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 5, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIAUIAUI
Full nameiShares Gold TrustNEOS Gold High Income ETF
IssueriSharesNEOS
Last Close$81.71 as of August 19, 2026$51.43 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield0.00%12.09%
Distribution Safety Score™ 79
Expense ratio0.25%0.79%
AUM$64.4B$549M
Distribution frequencyNoneMonthly
Underlying indexLBMA Gold PriceGold ETPs
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Seeks to generate high monthly income with potential appreciation through exposure to gold ETPs.
Asset classCommodityEquity
Inception date01/21/200506/05/2025
Beta0.36
Last dividend$0.5182
Ex-dividend date08/19/2026

Bottom lineChoose IAU if you want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress. Choose IAUI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 12.09%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: IAUI's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while IAU keeps full price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. IAUI generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs473
Total AUM$4710B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IAU.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IAUI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

IAU (iShares Gold Trust) and IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

IAUI currently shows a 12.09% distribution yield. IAU has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

IAU is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.25% compared to 0.79%.

They track different benchmarks: IAU is linked to LBMA Gold Price while IAUI tracks Gold ETPs, which means their performance drivers differ.

IAU is the larger fund by assets ($64.4B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose IAU

iShares Gold Trust

  • Want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and equity stress.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.25% expense ratio vs 0.79% for IAUI.

Choose IAUI

NEOS Gold High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — IAUI distributes roughly 12.09% from selling options premium, while IAU makes no distribution.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IAU has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while IAUI would produce $100.75/month, at current distribution rates.

IAU yield0.00%
IAUI yield12.09%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IAU would cost approximately $250 in fees vs $790 for IAUI (simplified, not compounded). The $540.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IAU ER0.25%
IAUI ER0.79%

Strategy & risk

IAU tracks LBMA Gold Price with a metals approach, while IAUI tracks Gold ETPs with a metals approach.

IAU beta0.36
IAUI beta

Fund details

IAU is managed by iShares (launched 01/21/2005) with $64.4B in assets. IAUI is managed by NEOS (launched 06/05/2025) with $549M in assets.

IAU AUM$64.4B
IAUI AUM$549M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of IAU or IAUI pays more dividend income?

IAUI currently reports a distribution yield, while IAU has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between IAU and IAUI?

IAU (iShares Gold Trust) tracks LBMA Gold Price with a metals approach, while IAUI (NEOS Gold High Income ETF) tracks Gold ETPs with a metals approach. They are issued by iShares and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both IAU and IAUI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, IAU or IAUI?

IAU has an expense ratio of 0.25% while IAUI charges 0.79%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IAU vs IAUI generate?

At current rates, IAU has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in IAUI would produce about $100.75 per month ($1,209.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IAU or IAUI?

IAU has outpaced IAUI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 35.01% total return against 19.40%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — IAU has compounded at 27.54% a year versus 16.56% for IAUI. IAUI has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 22.4% against 28.8% for IAU. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare IAU with

Popular comparisons

IAU vs IAUI — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

IAU is a straightforward gold ETF holding physical gold bullion, offering pure commodity exposure with minimal fees. IAUI is a newer fund launched in mid-2025 that wraps gold ETPs (like IAU itself) and overlays a covered-call strategy to generate monthly income. The core difference: IAU is buy-and-hold commodity exposure; IAUI is an income-harvesting vehicle built on top of gold products.

How they differ

IAU holds actual gold bars and pays no distributions—it's a storage-and-spot-price play. IAUI holds gold ETPs and sells call options against them to fund an 11.29% annualized distribution paid monthly. That's the fundamental split: commodity versus income derivative.

Fees reflect the complexity gap. IAU charges 0.25% annually on $60.5B in AUM, making it one of the cheapest ways to own gold. IAUI costs 0.79% and has just $539M in AUM, typical pricing for a newer active-overlay strategy.

IAUI's covered-call approach means your upside is capped at the strike price each month—you keep the premium but forgo gains beyond that level. IAU has no such ceiling; your gain is whatever gold's price rise delivers. The trade-off is income now (IAUI) versus potential price appreciation (IAU). IAUI also carries options risk and counterparty risk tied to the underlying gold ETPs it holds.

Who each is best for

IAU: Fits investors seeking long-term gold exposure as an inflation hedge or portfolio diversifier without needing income. The minimal fees and massive liquidity suit buy-and-hold positioning.

IAUI: Designed for income-focused gold investors comfortable with monthly payouts and a capped upside; the strategy works best when gold prices are range-bound or declining, since call-premium capture benefits from sideways-to-down markets rather than rallies.

Key risks to know

  • Synthetic income and NAV erosion: IAUI's 11.29% distribution yield is mechanically generated through option sales, not underlying gold appreciation. This structure creates material risk of NAV decline if gold rallies sharply, since call options lock in capped gains while distributions continue.
  • Covered-call cap on appreciation: IAUI's monthly call writing caps your upside. During a gold rally, you'll miss gains beyond the strike—a real opportunity cost if gold breaks out.
  • Options and roll risk: The strategy depends on continuously selling calls at profitable strikes. In low-volatility or downtrending gold markets, premium shrinks, potentially forcing the fund to lower strikes or risk deeper NAV erosion to maintain the stated distribution.
  • Fund maturity and liquidity: IAUI launched in June 2025 with $539M in AUM, versus IAU's $60.5B and 20-year operating history. The newer fund has less operational track record and smaller assets, which may affect pricing efficiency and liquidity.
  • Gold commodity volatility: Both funds track gold, which can swing sharply on Fed policy, real rates, and USD strength. IAU absorbs this as price swings; IAUI masks it partly via income, but NAV erosion still occurs if gold declines.

Bottom line

IAU delivers pure, low-cost gold exposure with no income but full upside participation. IAUI converts gold into monthly paychecks by capping gains—a tradeoff that works well if you prioritize current income over appreciation and expect gold to trade sideways. If you value simplicity and long-term appreciation, IAU's structure and cost are hard to beat; if you need monthly distributions and accept capped upside, IAUI addresses that need directly. Past performance of either fund does not predict future results, and the relative value depends heavily on your outlook for gold prices and your income requirements.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.