DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ISPY vs XDTE: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF and Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

Bottom lineChoose ISPY if you want simple, diversified core exposure in one low-cost fund. Choose XDTE if you want to maximize current income — roughly 24.67%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: XDTE's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while ISPY keeps full price exposure.

ETFs165
Total AUM$123B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

ProShares is known for offering leveraged and inverse ETFs that provide amplified exposure to market movements, along with thematic and income-focused strategies. Their fund lineup spans digital assets (including Bitcoin and Ethereum exposure through BITO and EETH), dividend strategies like the Dividend Aristocrats fund (NOBL), covered call income strategies, and leveraged/inverse products that track major indices with 2x or 3x daily multipliers (such as SSO and TQQQ for tech-heavy portfolios). With 23 ETFs across specialized families including leveraged products, money market funds, and sector-specific offerings, ProShares serves investors seeking both traditional income and alternative exposure strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ISPY.

ETFs55
Total AUM$28.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XDTE.

Side-by-side snapshot

ISPYXDTE
Full nameProShares S&P 500 High Income ETFRoundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call
IssuerProSharesRoundhill Investments
Last Close$47.99 as of July 8, 2026$39.01 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield6.30%24.67%
Distribution Safety Score 6384
Expense ratio0.55%0.95%
AUM$1.28B$317M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeekly
Underlying indexSPXSPX
ObjectiveSeeks investment results that track the performance of the S&P 500 Daily Covered Call Index, pursuing a daily covered call writing strategy that combines a long position in the S&P 500 Index with short positions in daily call options.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/11/202408/15/2024
Beta0.93420.91
Last dividend$0.2518$0.1851
Ex-dividend date07/01/202607/01/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

ISPY has lagged XDTE over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.13% total return against 18.51%. Measured from Mar 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — ISPY has compounded at 15.75% a year versus 15.55% for XDTE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Mar 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ISPY7.95%18.13%15.75%12.3%1.001.37-8.4%
XDTE6.63%18.51%15.55%11.7%1.081.51-7.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 2024” measures every fund from March 7, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

ISPY (ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XDTE offers the higher yield at 24.67% vs 6.30% for ISPY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ISPY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.55% compared to 0.95%.

ISPY is the larger fund by assets ($1.28B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose ISPY

ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want simple, diversified core exposure as a portfolio building block.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.55% expense ratio vs 0.95% for XDTE.

Choose XDTE

Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call

  • Want to maximize current income — XDTE distributes roughly 24.67% from selling options premium, vs 6.30% for ISPY.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ISPY would generate roughly $52.50/month, while XDTE would produce $205.58/month, at current distribution rates.

ISPY yield6.30%
XDTE yield24.67%
Monthly diff on $10K$153.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ISPY would cost approximately $550 in fees vs $950 for XDTE (simplified, not compounded). The $400.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ISPY ER0.55%
XDTE ER0.95%

Strategy & risk

Both ISPY and XDTE wrap SPX with options-based income overlays (basket and covered call). The practical differences are yield target, fee structure, and issuer track record — not the underlying mechanic. Beta is 0.9342 for ISPY and 0.91 for XDTE, indicating XDTE is less volatile relative to the market.

ISPY beta0.9342
XDTE beta0.91

Fund details

ISPY is managed by ProShares (launched 09/11/2024) with $1.28B in assets. XDTE is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 08/15/2024) with $317M in assets.

ISPY AUM$1.28B
XDTE AUM$317M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is ISPY or XDTE better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XDTE currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ISPY and XDTE?

Both ISPY (ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF) and XDTE (Roundhill ETF Trust - Roundhill S&P 500 0DTE Covered Call) track SPX with options-based income strategies — the labels "basket" and "covered call" describe closely related mechanics (covered calls are a specific type of options strategy). The real differences show up in yield target (6.30% vs 24.67%), expense ratio (0.55% vs 0.95%), and issuer (ProShares vs Roundhill Investments).

Can I hold both ISPY and XDTE?

You can, but expect significant overlap. Both funds use options-based income strategies on SPX, so holding them together gives you two wrappers around effectively the same exposure — not true diversification. Weigh issuer, fee, and yield differences rather than treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, ISPY or XDTE?

ISPY has an expense ratio of 0.55% while XDTE charges 0.95%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ISPY vs XDTE generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ISPY would generate roughly $52.50 per month ($630.00 annually). The same in XDTE would produce about $205.58 per month ($2,467.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ISPY or XDTE?

ISPY has lagged XDTE over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.13% total return against 18.51%. Measured from Mar 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — ISPY has compounded at 15.75% a year versus 15.55% for XDTE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ISPY vs XDTE — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

Both ISPY and XDTE are S&P 500 covered call ETFs launched in mid-2024 that write daily (0DTE) options to generate income. The critical distinction: ISPY targets a 6.32% distribution rate with monthly payouts and a daily roll strategy, while XDTE pursues a 24.76% distribution rate with weekly payouts through a more aggressive 0DTE options approach. Both track the SPX underlying, but their yield targets and payout cadences reflect fundamentally different income philosophies.

How they differ

The headline difference is distribution yield. XDTE's 24.76% annualized distribution rate is nearly four times ISPY's 6.32%, reflecting a much more aggressive options-writing posture. XDTE resets and rolls its call positions weekly, capturing compressed time decay on deep 0DTE contracts, while ISPY uses a daily roll that targets slower, more predictable income generation.

Second, the expense ratio gap widens the net return picture. ISPY charges 0.55% annually versus XDTE's 0.95%—a 40-basis-point difference that matters more at ISPY's modest yield but becomes a smaller drag on XDTE's larger gross distributions.

Third, asset base and maturity differ markedly. ISPY has grown to $1.28B in AUM since September 2024, suggesting broader institutional and retail adoption. XDTE, launched a month earlier, holds $317M, reflecting either tighter product fit or shorter track record. Both have beta close to 0.91–0.93, implying similar downside capture, but ISPY's larger scale may offer tighter bid-ask spreads and easier entry/exit.

Who each is best for

ISPY: Fits investors seeking monthly dividend income from the S&P 500 with a yield target around 6%, accepting lower optionality frequency in exchange for simpler distributions and lower fee drag. Works for those who view covered calls as a modest yield enhancement rather than a primary income engine.

XDTE: Fits investors with higher cash-flow needs and comfort with weekly payouts and aggressive options rolling. Suits shorter time horizons and risk appetites willing to accept faster NAV erosion in exchange for much higher current income.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion from high distribution yield. XDTE's 24.76% annual payout is significantly higher than underlying S&P 500 total returns in most environments. Distributions likely include return-of-capital treatment and will erode NAV over time unless equity prices appreciate sharply.
  • Weekly versus monthly reset timing risk. XDTE rolls its position seven times per month, compressing gamma and vega exposure; ISPY rolls daily. In volatile markets, more frequent resets can lock in losses and reduce upside capture when equities rebound between roll dates.
  • 0DTE convexity and tail risk. Both funds write calls that expire within one business day, meaning gap risk over weekends and overnight gaps can trigger forced early assignment or rapid repricing. A sharp SPX spike on Monday open could leave both funds short the move or forced to roll at disadvantageous prices.
  • Short track record and limited performance history. Both funds launched within weeks of each other in August–September 2024. Neither has survived a complete market cycle, correction, or volatility regime shift. Realized distributions and NAV behavior under stress remain untested.

Bottom line

If you prioritize steady, moderate income with lower fees and larger liquidity depth, ISPY's 6.32% yield and monthly cadence offer a more conservative covered-call flavor. If you need aggressive cash flow and accept weekly volatility and faster NAV decay, XDTE's 24.76% distribution appeals—but understand it is trading principal for current income. Both expose you to options reset risk and unproven track records; past performance data are too short to guide future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.