DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

LUMA vs SMH: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of KraneShares Photonic and Optical ETF and VanEck Semiconductor ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • LUMAInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • SMHInvestors who want higher current income (0.19% while LUMA makes no distribution).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricLUMASMH
Full nameKraneShares Photonic and Optical ETFVanEck Semiconductor ETF
IssuerKraneSharesVanEck
Last Close$26.61 as of August 13, 2026$584.83 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield0.19%
Distribution Safety Score™ 93
Expense ratio1.00%0.35%
AUM$2.15M$71.5B
Distribution frequencyAnnualAnnual
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
ObjectiveSeeks capital appreciation by investing in public and private companies worldwide that build photonic and optical hardware — optical interconnects, transceivers, fiber-optic cables, lasers, and other light-based infrastructure moving data for AI and the modern digital economy.Track the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/14/202612/20/2011
Beta2.05
Last dividend$1.1050
Ex-dividend date12/22/2025

— Distribution yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because LUMA launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineChoose LUMA if you want broad equity exposure. Choose SMH if you want higher current income (0.19% while LUMA makes no distribution).

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs35
Total AUM$9.43B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

KraneShares is known for pioneering thematic and alternative ETF strategies that capture emerging trends and specialized market segments. The issuer's fund lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call and high-yield approaches, alongside thematic funds targeting areas like artificial intelligence, cryptocurrency, cannabis, and other innovative sectors. KraneShares distinguishes itself through a diversified portfolio of specialized ETFs designed for investors seeking exposure beyond traditional asset classes, with a particular emphasis on capturing opportunities in evolving industries and alternative income generation strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on LUMA.

ETFs84
Total AUM$161B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

LUMA has lagged SMH over the year to date, posting a 10.16% total return against 56.66%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTDSince Jul 2026
LUMA10.16%10.16%
SMH56.66%-1.01%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 15, 2026 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window.

Quick verdict

LUMA (KraneShares Photonic and Optical ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both annual-pay ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SMH currently shows a 0.19% distribution yield. LUMA has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

SMH is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 1.00%.

SMH has $71.5B in assets vs $2.15M for LUMA, but LUMA only launched July 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, LUMA has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while SMH would produce $1.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay annual distributions.

LUMA yield
SMH yield0.19%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, LUMA would cost approximately $1,000 in fees vs $350 for SMH (simplified, not compounded). The $650.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

LUMA ER1.00%
SMH ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

LUMA is an ETF, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach.

LUMA beta
SMH beta2.05

Fund details

LUMA is managed by KraneShares (launched 07/14/2026) with $2.15M in assets. SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $71.5B in assets.

LUMA AUM$2.15M
SMH AUM$71.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of LUMA or SMH pays more dividend income?

SMH currently reports a distribution yield, while LUMA has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between LUMA and SMH?

LUMA (KraneShares Photonic and Optical ETF) is an ETF, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach. They are issued by KraneShares and VanEck respectively.

Can I hold both LUMA and SMH?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, LUMA or SMH?

LUMA has an expense ratio of 1.00% while SMH charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in LUMA vs SMH generate?

At current rates, LUMA has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in SMH would produce about $1.58 per month ($19.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, LUMA or SMH?

LUMA has lagged SMH over the year to date, posting a 10.16% total return against 56.66%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

LUMA vs SMH — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

LUMA is a newly launched thematic ETF focused on photonics and optical hardware—the light-based infrastructure powering AI data centers and digital networks. SMH is a large, established semiconductor index tracker that holds the 25 largest publicly listed chip companies. The fundamental difference: LUMA targets a specific enabling technology within a narrower ecosystem, while SMH captures broad semiconductor exposure through the largest, most liquid names in the industry.

How they differ

LUMA's strategy centers on photonics—optical interconnects, transceivers, lasers, and fiber infrastructure—whereas SMH tracks a broad index of the largest semiconductor manufacturers and designers. LUMA launched in July 2026 with $2.15M in AUM and carries a 1.00% expense ratio; SMH has been trading since 2011, holds $71.5B in assets, and charges 0.35%. LUMA offers no current distribution yield, while SMH distributes 0.19% annually. The scale gap is stark: SMH's market capitalization and index-tracking structure provide deep liquidity and lower costs, while LUMA's nascent size and thematic focus introduce concentration risk and higher fees.

Who each is best for

LUMA: Fits investors seeking targeted exposure to the optical and photonic hardware segment powering AI and data-center growth, with high conviction in that subsector and tolerance for significant tracking variance and liquidity constraints.

SMH: Fits investors wanting broad, liquid exposure to the largest semiconductor companies through a rules-based index, with lower fees and established trading volume suitable for core technology holdings.

Key risks to know

  • LUMA's minimal AUM and recent inception: At $2.15M with less than six months of trading history, liquidity is extremely limited, and the fund may struggle to attract assets or sustain operations. Wide bid-ask spreads and intraday price volatility are likely.
  • Concentration within photonics subsector: LUMA holds only companies in optical and photonic hardware, a narrow slice of the tech ecosystem. A slowdown in AI-driven data-center buildout or a shift in interconnect architecture could sharply impact performance.
  • SMH's high beta exposure: At a beta of 1.98, SMH amplifies semiconductor sector volatility by roughly double the broader market. Downturns in chip demand or supply-chain disruptions hit this holding harder than the overall market.
  • Overlapping technology exposure: Both funds are exposed to the tech sector and may move together during broad semiconductor or AI cycle swings, limiting diversification benefit if held together.
  • Valuation sensitivity in growth narratives: LUMA relies on the long-term AI and optical-infrastructure investment thesis; SMH depends on semiconductor demand cycles. Both can experience sharp drawdowns if growth expectations shift.

Bottom line

LUMA targets a specific enabling-technology theme with early-stage fund characteristics and higher fees; SMH offers established, low-cost broad semiconductor index exposure. If you want concentrated thematic exposure to photonics and can tolerate minimal liquidity and early-fund risk, LUMA reflects that conviction; if you prefer lower costs, deeper liquidity, and diversified semiconductor holdings, SMH's scale and index structure fit that profile. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.