DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ODTE vs RDTE: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF and Roundhill RDTE Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

ODTE has lagged RDTE over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 5.80% total return against 15.63%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Apr 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ODTE5.80%13.8%0.570.79-7.2%
RDTE15.63%15.4%1.772.72-5.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Apr 2026” measures every fund from April 6, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Apr 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Apr 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricODTERDTE
Full nameVegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETFRoundhill RDTE Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy
IssuerVegaSharesRoundhill Investments
Underlying indexS&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000Russell 2000
Last Close$25.00 as of September 18, 2026$26.80 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate14.14%20.96%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5078
Safety-Adjusted Yield 16.35%
Expense ratio0.76%0.97%
AUM$2.75M$182M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks weekly income by investing at least 80% of net assets in the constituents of the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100 and Russell 2000 indices, or instruments linked to them, alongside an options premium strategy.Seeks weekly income by investing at least 80% of net assets in instruments that provide exposure to the Russell 2000 Index and writing zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) call options against that exposure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/03/202609/10/2024
Beta1.1785
Last dividend$0.068 payable today$0.108 payable today
Ex-dividend date09/17/202609/17/2026

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: ODTE launched April 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. ODTE and RDTE generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs5
Total AUM$60.9M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ODTE.

ETFs56
Total AUM$37.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on RDTE.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

ODTE (VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF) and RDTE (Roundhill RDTE Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

RDTE offers the higher yield at 20.96% vs 14.14% for ODTE. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ODTE is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.76% compared to 0.97%.

They have different reference exposures: ODTE is linked to S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 while RDTE is linked to Russell 2000, which means their performance drivers differ.

RDTE has $182M in assets vs $2.75M for ODTE, but ODTE only launched April 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ODTE would generate roughly $117.83/month, while RDTE would produce $174.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

ODTE yield14.14%
RDTE yield20.96%
Monthly diff on $10K$56.83

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ODTE would cost approximately $760 in fees vs $970 for RDTE (simplified, not compounded). The $210.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ODTE ER0.76%
RDTE ER0.97%

Strategy & risk

ODTE tracks S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 with a covered call approach, while RDTE tracks Russell 2000 with a covered call approach.

ODTE beta
RDTE beta1.1785

Fund details

ODTE is managed by VegaShares (launched 04/03/2026) with $2.75M in assets. RDTE is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 09/10/2024) with $182M in assets.

ODTE AUM$2.75M
RDTE AUM$182M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for ODTE and RDTE?

ODTE currently distributes 14.14% and RDTE 20.96%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is ODTE or RDTE better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. RDTE currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ODTE and RDTE?

ODTE (VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF) tracks S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 with a covered call approach, while RDTE (Roundhill RDTE Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy) tracks Russell 2000 with a covered call approach. They are issued by VegaShares and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both ODTE and RDTE?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is ODTE or RDTE safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — RDTE scores 78, ODTE scores 50, so RDTE's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, ODTE or RDTE?

ODTE has an expense ratio of 0.76% while RDTE charges 0.97%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ODTE vs RDTE generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ODTE would generate roughly $117.83 per month ($1,414.00 annually). The same in RDTE would produce about $174.67 per month ($2,096.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ODTE or RDTE?

ODTE has lagged RDTE over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 5.80% total return against 15.63%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ODTE vs RDTE — at a glance

Generated September 19, 2026.

Overview

ODTE and RDTE are both weekly-income ETFs using 0DTE (zero-days-to-expiration) covered call strategies to generate premium income. Both sell call options expiring the same day they're written to harvest time decay, but they target different equity universes and arrive at markedly different yield profiles. RDTE has accumulated $182M in assets since 09/10/2024, while ODTE holds only $2.75M and is newer to market (04/03/2026).

Who each is best for

ODTE: Fits investors seeking weekly income who prefer exposure to both large-cap technology/growth (via Nasdaq-100 and S&P 500) and small-cap equities in a single wrapper, and who are comfortable with the still-emerging 0DTE options landscape.

RDTE: Fits investors targeting aggressive weekly income and willing to accept concentration risk and small-cap volatility in exchange for a higher yield, with a preference for a fund that has demonstrated operational stability over multiple market cycles.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at distribution yields above 20%. RDTE's 20.96% yield implies distributions exceed typical underlying equity gains; sustained reliance on return-of-capital treatment or accelerating principal decay is likely if the Russell 2000 does not appreciate meaningfully or if options premiums compress.
  • 0DTE gamma and roll risk. Selling options that expire intraday or the next morning creates extreme gamma exposure during the final hours—adverse price moves can force rapid adjustments or force assignment, disrupting portfolio rebalancing and incurring transaction costs that erode returns.
  • Russell 2000 concentration and liquidity. RDTE's single-index focus amplifies drawdown severity in small-cap downturns and narrows the pool of liquid options available to sell, potentially forcing wider bid-ask spreads or smaller notional premiums as market volatility spikes.
  • Limited fund track record and asset base. ODTE's $2.75M and young inception date mean minimal real-world performance data; RDTE, though larger, is still establishing a long-term operational and distributional baseline.
  • Options market microstructure risk. Weekly or daily roll cycles across thousands of option contracts amplify execution risk, slippage, and the potential for gaps between implied and realized volatility to erode the premium-capture thesis.

Bottom line

If you want exposure to diversified large- and small-cap equity alongside modest weekly income, ODTE offers a broad-based approach; if you prioritize maximum current yield and accept single-index small-cap concentration, RDTE delivers a substantially higher distribution rate. Both funds rely on sustained elevated volatility and tight options spreads to sustain their yield profiles—verify that assumptions fit your market outlook and income needs. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.