CZAR — Themes Natural Monopoly ETF
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF (CZAR)
CZAR pays a 1.48% distribution rate, annual, on a 0.35% expense ratio. Its Distribution Safety Score™ is 50 (Caution). Total return is 27.9% over the past 2.6 years, 36.3 points behind SPY at 64.2%. Its deepest 1-year drawdown was 9.5%.
Themes Natural Monopoly ETF is an equity ETF that tracks an index of large- and mid-capitalization companies with strong competitive advantages in their respective sectors, investing at least eighty percent of its assets in index securities and related depositary receipts. The fund carries a modest current distribution rate with annual distributions and has a low expense ratio of 0.35%. It appeals to income and value-oriented investors seeking exposure to companies with durable competitive moats, though as a non-diversified fund it concentrates risk in fewer holdings than traditional broad-market equity funds.
CZAR key facts
- Distribution Safety Score™
- 50 · Caution
- Issuer
- Themes
- Asset type
- ETF
- Asset class
- Equity
- Inception date
- 12/12/2023
- Expense ratio
- 0.35%
- Distribution rate
- 1.48%
- Distribution frequency
- Annual
- Trailing yield
- 1.48%
- Last close
- $31.75
- AUM
- $1,569,666
- Average volume
- 0.0
- Last dividend
- $0.4700
- Ex-dividend date
- 12/18/2025
- Payment date
- 12/19/2025
- Beta
- 0.6093
- P/E ratio
- 23.3777
More funds from Themes.
Issuers
Issuers are only used for ETFs and CEFs.
| Tickers | Family | Dist. Freq. | Dist. Rate | Total Return | AUM |
|---|
Screener
Drag headers to reorder. Drag column edges to resize.
| Popular | Logo | Tickers | Name | Issuer | Asset Type | Dist. Frequency | AUM | Price | Avg Volume | Inception Date | Expense Ratio | Dist. Rate | Distribution Safety Score™ | Safety-Adjusted Yield | Payout Stability | Alpha | Vs SPY | Vs QQQ | TR 1M | TR 3M | TR 6M | TR YTD | TR 1Y | TR 2Y | TR 3Y | TR 5Y | TR 10Y | TR Max | Hide row |
|---|
Tickers
| Ticker | Name | Weight |
|---|
Compare ETFs and dividend investments
Add one ticker at a time or paste several — separate with commas, spaces, or “vs” (e.g. SCHD vs JEPI vs VYM).
Import tickers from a picture or X post
Pull tickers off a screenshot or an X post. Detected tickers are shown for review before adding. Images and links are processed only to detect ticker symbols and are not saved to your comparison history.
Importing tickers from a picture or an X post is a Pro feature.
Paste a link to an X (Twitter) post — we read tickers from its text and any pictures.
- Choose peers with similar goals, such as dividend income or broad-market growth.
- Check income and return. A higher yield can come with weaker price growth.
- Review risk, fees, and overlap across the investments' shared history.
Enter tickers above, paste “SCHD vs JEPI,” or choose a popular comparison.
AI-generated analysis — AI can make mistakes. Verify important information independently. Not investment advice. AI risk disclosure
Income is not the same as return. Distribution yield measures cash paid to investors; total return also includes price changes. Compare both, especially for option-income and other high-distribution funds.
Watchlist
| Select | # | Logo | Ticker | Name | Issuer | Asset Type | AUM | Expense Ratio | Inception | Dist. Frequency | Dist. Rate | Distribution Safety Score™ | Remove |
|---|
Curated watchlists
Based on your holdings
Popular Tickers
Open in ScreenerPortfolio Popularity Map
See how widely each ticker is held and how heavily its holders allocate to it.
| # | Ticker | Issuer | % of Portfolios | 7-Day Δ | Avg % of Portfolio | Dist Rate | Dist Freq | Total Return | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||||
Alpha Rankings
Was each fund worth owning, compared to just holding what it's secretly made of? Every night we build the portfolio of plain index ETFs that most closely matched each covered fund's daily total returns, then rank the funds by alpha — what they earned beyond that copycat recipe.
Loading rankings…
Alpha is a statistical estimate, not a promise — only promising and reliable leftovers are ranked. Funds whose recipe fits too poorly, whose leftover looks like noise, or that are themselves a benchmark building block are listed separately. Option-strategy effects may not be fully captured by a linear model. Nothing here is investment advice. Coverage: funds held in at least five Dividend Vision accounts (privacy-filtered — only ticker symbols are read) or searched enough in the last 30 days. A missing ticker card means the fund is not yet in the analysed set, never that its alpha is zero.