LRGF — iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF (LRGF)
LRGF pays a 0.97% distribution rate, quarterly, on a 0.08% expense ratio. Its Distribution Safety Score™ is 100 (Safe), giving a Safety-Adjusted Yield of 0.97%. Distributions fell 16.9% over the past year. Total return is 286.2% over the past 11.3 years, 62.7 points behind SPY at 348.9%. Its deepest 1-year drawdown was 8.9%.
iShares U.S. Equity Factor ETF is an ETF that invests at least 80% of its assets in large- and mid-capitalization U.S. equities selected and weighted to maximize exposure to five factors: momentum, quality, value, low volatility, and size. The fund distributes on a quarterly basis with a modest current distribution rate and carries a low expense ratio of 0.08%. The strategy may appeal to income-oriented investors seeking factor-based equity exposure combined with regular distributions.
LRGF key facts
- Distribution Safety Score™
- 100 · Safe
- Safety-Adjusted Yield
- 0.97%
- Issuer
- iShares
- Asset type
- ETF
- Asset class
- Equity
- Inception date
- 04/28/2015
- Expense ratio
- 0.08%
- Distribution rate
- 0.97%
- Distribution frequency
- Quarterly
- Trailing yield
- 1.03%
- Last close
- $79.23
- AUM
- $3,739,274,095
- Average volume
- 64200.0
- Last dividend
- $0.1930
- Ex-dividend date
- 06/15/2026
- Payment date
- 06/18/2026
- Beta
- 1.0
- P/E ratio
- 24.8382
More funds from iShares.
Issuers
Issuers are only used for ETFs and CEFs.
| Tickers | Family | Dist. Freq. | Dist. Rate | Total Return | AUM |
|---|
Screener
Drag headers to reorder. Drag column edges to resize.
| Popular | Logo | Tickers | Name | Issuer | Asset Type | Dist. Frequency | AUM | Price | Avg Volume | Inception Date | Expense Ratio | Dist. Rate | Distribution Safety Score™ | Safety-Adjusted Yield | Payout Stability | Alpha | Vs SPY | Vs QQQ | TR 1M | TR 3M | TR 6M | TR YTD | TR 1Y | TR 2Y | TR 3Y | TR 5Y | TR 10Y | TR Max | Hide row |
|---|
Tickers
| Ticker | Name | Weight |
|---|
Compare ETFs and dividend investments
Add one ticker at a time or paste several — separate with commas, spaces, or “vs” (e.g. SCHD vs JEPI vs VYM).
Import tickers from a picture or X post
Pull tickers off a screenshot or an X post. Detected tickers are shown for review before adding. Images and links are processed only to detect ticker symbols and are not saved to your comparison history.
Importing tickers from a picture or an X post is a Pro feature.
Paste a link to an X (Twitter) post — we read tickers from its text and any pictures.
- Choose peers with similar goals, such as dividend income or broad-market growth.
- Check income and return. A higher yield can come with weaker price growth.
- Review risk, fees, and overlap across the investments' shared history.
Enter tickers above, paste “SCHD vs JEPI,” or choose a popular comparison.
AI-generated analysis — AI can make mistakes. Verify important information independently. Not investment advice. AI risk disclosure
Income is not the same as return. Distribution yield measures cash paid to investors; total return also includes price changes. Compare both, especially for option-income and other high-distribution funds.
Watchlist
| Select | # | Logo | Ticker | Name | Issuer | Asset Type | AUM | Expense Ratio | Inception | Dist. Frequency | Dist. Rate | Distribution Safety Score™ | Remove |
|---|
Curated watchlists
Based on your holdings
Popular Tickers
Open in ScreenerPortfolio Popularity Map
See how widely each ticker is held and how heavily its holders allocate to it.
| # | Ticker | Issuer | % of Portfolios | 7-Day Δ | Avg % of Portfolio | Dist Rate | Dist Freq | Total Return | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loading… | |||||||||
Alpha Rankings
Was each fund worth owning, compared to just holding what it's secretly made of? Every night we build the portfolio of plain index ETFs that most closely matched each covered fund's daily total returns, then rank the funds by alpha — what they earned beyond that copycat recipe.
Loading rankings…
Alpha is a statistical estimate, not a promise — only promising and reliable leftovers are ranked. Funds whose recipe fits too poorly, whose leftover looks like noise, or that are themselves a benchmark building block are listed separately. Option-strategy effects may not be fully captured by a linear model. Nothing here is investment advice. Coverage: funds held in at least five Dividend Vision accounts (privacy-filtered — only ticker symbols are read) or searched enough in the last 30 days. A missing ticker card means the fund is not yet in the analysed set, never that its alpha is zero.