DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AAPL vs AAPW: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Apple Inc. and Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

ETFs55
Total AUM$28.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AAPW.

Side-by-side snapshot

AAPLAAPW
Full nameApple Inc.Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF
IssuerRoundhill Investments
Last Close$310.66 as of July 8, 2026$40.45 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield0.33%12.98%
Distribution Safety Score 10044
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$41.9M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexApple (AAPL)
ObjectiveDesigns, manufactures, and markets smartphones, personal computers, tablets, wearables, and accessories. Also provides digital content, streaming, and cloud services.AAPW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Apple Inc. before fees.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A02/19/2025
Beta1.0971.0844
Last dividend$0.2700$0.1010
Ex-dividend date05/11/202607/06/2026

Bottom lineChoose AAPL if you want broad equity exposure. Choose AAPW if you want higher current income (12.98% vs 0.33% for AAPL).

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AAPL has lagged AAPW over the trailing twelve months, posting a 48.56% total return against 51.99%. Measured from Feb 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — AAPL has compounded at 19.32% a year versus 16.72% for AAPW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AAPL14.84%48.56%19.32%24.1%1.472.27-13.8%
AAPW14.93%51.99%16.72%29.2%1.281.96-17.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2025” measures every fund from February 19, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a stock, while AAPW (Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

AAPW offers the higher yield at 12.98% vs 0.33% for AAPL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AAPL would generate roughly $2.75/month, while AAPW would produce $108.17/month, at current distribution rates.

AAPL yield0.33%
AAPW yield12.98%
Monthly diff on $10K$105.42

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AAPL would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,000 for AAPW (simplified, not compounded). The $1,000.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AAPL ER
AAPW ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

AAPL is a stock, while AAPW tracks Apple (AAPL) with a leverage approach. Beta is 1.097 for AAPL and 1.0844 for AAPW, indicating AAPW is less volatile relative to the market.

AAPL beta1.097
AAPW beta1.0844

Fund details

AAPL is managed by — (launched 12/12/1980) with — in assets. AAPW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 02/19/2025) with $41.9M in assets.

AAPL AUM
AAPW AUM$41.9M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is AAPL or AAPW better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. AAPW currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between AAPL and AAPW?

AAPL (Apple Inc.) is a stock, while AAPW (Roundhill AAPL WeeklyPay ETF) tracks Apple (AAPL) with a leverage approach. They are issued by — and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both AAPL and AAPW?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, AAPL or AAPW?

AAPL has an expense ratio of — while AAPW charges 1.00%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AAPL vs AAPW generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in AAPL would generate roughly $2.75 per month ($33.00 annually). The same in AAPW would produce about $108.17 per month ($1,298.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AAPL or AAPW?

AAPL has lagged AAPW over the trailing twelve months, posting a 48.56% total return against 51.99%. Measured from Feb 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — AAPL has compounded at 19.32% a year versus 16.72% for AAPW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AAPL vs AAPW — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

AAPL is the common stock of Apple Inc., the consumer technology giant that designs and manufactures iPhones, Macs, wearables, and operates services like Apple TV+ and iCloud. AAPW is a newly launched ETF that holds Apple stock but amplifies payouts through a 120% leveraged total-return strategy paired with weekly distributions, creating a synthetic 13.14% yield. The funds track the same underlying company but deploy radically different distribution mechanics and leverage structures.

How they differ

The core difference is leverage and payout frequency. AAPL offers a 0.35% quarterly dividend from Apple's actual earnings; AAPW targets 13.14% in weekly distributions by using options or other derivatives to harvest 120% of Apple's weekly total return. That 37-fold difference in yield rate is the product, not organic profit. AAPW charges a 1.00% expense ratio on a tiny $41.9M asset base—launched in February 2025—while AAPL incurs only standard brokerage commissions. The leverage also shows in beta: AAPW's 1.0844 sits slightly below AAPL's 1.097, a sign that the weekly rebalancing dampens some volatility, though the synthetic payouts reintroduce risk elsewhere.

Who each is best for

AAPL: Fits investors seeking long-term capital appreciation with a modest dividend cushion, or those building a core technology holding in a diversified portfolio where quarterly payouts supplement returns rather than drive them.

AAPW: Designed for traders and income-focused speculators willing to accept NAV erosion and leverage-driven volatility in exchange for high weekly income, typically over short horizons of weeks to a few months rather than years.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme yield rates. A 13.14% annualized distribution on a $40-per-share price requires the fund to harvest capital aggressively week to week. At inception, there is no proven track record; any shortfall between 120% total-return targeting and actual weekly price movement will erode net asset value over time.
  • Leverage and options decay. Weekly rebalancing of leveraged positions incurs transaction costs and bid-ask friction. If Apple trades sideways or ranges, the synthetic-income machinery will likely underperform the math, draining capital in ways daily or quarterly rebalancing would not.
  • Structural obsolescence risk. AAPW launched in February 2025 with only $41.9M in assets. If inflows dry up or withdrawals accelerate, the fund may struggle to meet redemptions or face closure, forcing shareholders to exit at potentially unfavorable prices or liquidity bottlenecks.
  • Single-stock concentration and beta mismatch. Both funds are 100% exposed to Apple; unlike a broad tech ETF, there is no diversification. A sharp Apple earnings miss or antitrust action would affect both equally, but AAPW's leverage amplifies the downside.

Bottom line

AAPL suits long-term investors comfortable holding a mega-cap technology stock for growth and token income; AAPW targets traders seeking aggressive weekly payouts from the same underlying, accepting near-certain NAV decay in exchange for high near-term distributions. The tradeoff is stability and compounding upside versus weekly cash and structural erosion. Past performance does not predict future results, and the leverage embedded in AAPW has no history to validate its sustainability.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.