ACII
Generally safe
Limited data
ETF Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF and VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 5, 2026
No track record yet. VAIE launched within the last six months.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
Generally safe
Limited data
Unproven
Low confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF | VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF |
| Issuer | Innovator ETFs | VegaShares |
| Last Close | $24.80 as of November 5, 2026 | $21.60 as of November 5, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 10.06% | 17.09% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 9.41% | 8.85% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 77 | 50 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 7.75% | — |
| Expense ratio | 0.79% | 0.74% |
| AUM | $184M | $68.4M |
| Distribution frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Underlying index | — | NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index |
| Objective | — | Seeks weekly income by tracking a laddered autocallable index built on U.S. large-cap equities, using a full replication approach. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 09/24/2025 | 05/12/2026 |
| Beta | 0.239 | — |
| Last dividend | $0.20785 | $0.071 declared, pays 11/06/2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | 10/30/2026 | 11/05/2026 |
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
ACII has outpaced VAIE over the year to date, posting a 4.49% total return against -6.94%. ACII has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 7.5% against 21.3% for VAIE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since May 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACII | 4.49% | 1.05% | 7.5% | -0.27 | -0.35 | -2.7% |
| VAIE | -6.94% | -6.94% | 21.3% | -0.89 | -1.05 | -12.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2026” measures every fund from May 12, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since May 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since May 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: VAIE launched May 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.
Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.
Learn the mechanics: Return of capital, explained · NAV erosion, explained
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Innovator ETFs specializes in structured outcome and income-focused exchange-traded funds, with a particular emphasis on buffer strategies and defined protection approaches designed to manage downside risk. This niche positioning targets investors seeking alternative strategies beyond traditional buy-and-hold approaches, with an emphasis on principal protection and income generation mechanisms.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ACII.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VAIE.
ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) and VAIE (VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
VAIE's latest distribution annualizes to 17.09%, but it has paid 8.85% over the trailing 12 months (it has not paid for a full year yet). With VAIE's two yield figures this far apart, neither settles which fund pays more. Compare the distribution rate and trailing 12-month yield rows in the snapshot below.
VAIE is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.74% compared to 0.79%.
ACII has $184M in assets vs $68.4M for VAIE, but VAIE only launched May 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, ACII would pay about $1,006.00 a year (about $83.83 per monthly distribution), while VAIE would pay about $1,709.00 a year (about $32.87 per weekly distribution).
Over 10 years on $10,000, ACII would cost approximately $790 in fees vs $740 for VAIE (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
ACII is an ETF built around a structured products strategy, while VAIE tracks NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index with an options approach.
ACII is managed by Innovator ETFs (launched 09/24/2025) with $184M in assets. VAIE is managed by VegaShares (launched 05/12/2026) with $68.4M in assets.
ACII currently distributes 10.06%; VAIE's latest distribution annualizes to 17.09%, and it has paid 8.85% over the past 12 months, based on fund data updated November 2026. Because the two measures disagree for at least one fund, compare both rows in the snapshot and check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
It depends on your goals. VAIE's latest distribution annualizes to 17.09%, but it has paid 8.85% over the trailing 12 months (it has not paid for a full year yet). With VAIE's two yield figures this far apart, neither settles which fund pays more. Compare the distribution rate and trailing 12-month yield rows in the snapshot below. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
ACII (Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF built around a structured products strategy, while VAIE (VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF) tracks NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index with an options approach. They are issued by Innovator ETFs and VegaShares respectively.
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — ACII scores 77, VAIE scores 50, so ACII's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.
ACII has an expense ratio of 0.79% while VAIE charges 0.74%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
At current distribution rates, $10,000 in ACII would pay about $1,006.00 a year (about $83.83 per monthly distribution). $10,000 in VAIE would pay about $1,709.00 a year (about $32.87 per weekly distribution).
ACII has outpaced VAIE over the year to date, posting a 4.49% total return against -6.94%. ACII has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 7.5% against 21.3% for VAIE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Generated November 1, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
ACII and VAIE are both equity ETFs that use autocallable structured products to generate income from U.S. equities, but they differ sharply in payout frequency, yield target, and distribution rate. The autocallable structure in both cases means the underlying notes can terminate early if the reference index hits a preset level, potentially limiting upside capture. VAIE's expense ratio of 0.74% is 5 basis points cheaper than ACII's 0.79%, though both are modest. Both funds are quite young; ACII was launched in 09/24/2025 and VAIE in 05/12/2026, so neither has a long track record. ACII's $184M in assets is larger than VAIE's $68.4M, suggesting greater institutional adoption so far.
If you prioritize a stable monthly income stream, ACII's 10.06% distribution rate and monthly rhythm may appeal. If you prefer maximum weekly income, VAIE's 17.09% distribution rate and weekly cadence deliver more frequent payouts. Both rely on autocallable mechanics that cap upside and can terminate early—the embedded tradeoff between income frequency, yield level, and equity exposure is central to choosing between them. Past performance does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.