CAIQ
Generally safe
Limited data
ETF Comparison
A head-to-head comparison of Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF and VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 5, 2026
No track record yet. VAIE launched within the last six months.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
Generally safe
Limited data
Unproven
Low confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF | VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF |
| Issuer | Calamos Investments | VegaShares |
| Underlying index | Nasdaq-100 | NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index |
| Last Close | $22.94 as of November 5, 2026 | $21.60 as of November 5, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 20.47% | 17.09% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 18.31% | 8.85% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 75 | 50 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 15.35% | — |
| Expense ratio | 0.74% | 0.74% |
| AUM | $401M | $68.4M |
| Distribution frequency | Monthly | Weekly |
| Objective | Seeks to provide monthly income through an autocallable structured product strategy linked to the Nasdaq-100 Index while providing downside protection features. | Seeks weekly income by tracking a laddered autocallable index built on U.S. large-cap equities, using a full replication approach. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | 11/20/2025 | 05/12/2026 |
| Beta | 0.9632 | — |
| Last dividend | $0.39127 declared, pays 11/09/2026 | $0.071 declared, pays 11/06/2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | 11/02/2026 | 11/05/2026 |
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
CAIQ has outpaced VAIE over the year to date, posting a 3.92% total return against -6.94%. CAIQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.3% against 21.3% for VAIE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since May 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAIQ | 3.92% | -6.42% | 14.3% | -1.24 | -1.54 | -11.3% |
| VAIE | -6.94% | -6.94% | 21.3% | -0.89 | -1.05 | -12.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2026” measures every fund from May 12, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since May 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since May 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: VAIE launched May 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.
Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.
Learn the mechanics: Return of capital, explained · NAV erosion, explained
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Calamos Investments is known for developing structured and alternative income strategies that appeal to investors seeking downside protection alongside yield generation. The firm's lineup spans multiple specialized categories including autocallable income products, covered call strategies, closed-end funds, and structured alternative protection vehicles, reflecting a focus on income generation across varying risk profiles and market environments. Calamos maintains a broad portfolio of tickers across these strategies, positioning itself as a niche player in the alternative and structured income ETF space rather than a traditional broad-based fund family.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CAIQ.
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on VAIE.
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) and VAIE (VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.
CAIQ offers the higher yield at 20.47% vs 17.09% for VAIE. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
They have different reference exposures: CAIQ is linked to Nasdaq-100 while VAIE is linked to NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index, which means their performance drivers differ.
CAIQ has $401M in assets vs $68.4M for VAIE, but VAIE only launched May 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
Top-10 holdings unavailable for VAIE — cannot compute overlap.
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, CAIQ would pay about $2,047.00 a year (about $170.58 per monthly distribution), while VAIE would pay about $1,709.00 a year (about $32.87 per weekly distribution).
Over 10 years on $10,000, CAIQ would cost approximately $740 in fees vs $740 for VAIE (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.
CAIQ tracks Nasdaq-100 with an autocallable approach, while VAIE tracks NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index with an options approach.
CAIQ is managed by Calamos Investments (launched 11/20/2025) with $401M in assets. VAIE is managed by VegaShares (launched 05/12/2026) with $68.4M in assets.
CAIQ currently distributes 20.47% and VAIE 17.09%, based on fund data updated November 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
It depends on your goals. CAIQ currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
CAIQ (Calamos Nasdaq Autocallable Income ETF) tracks Nasdaq-100 with an autocallable approach, while VAIE (VegaShares US Equity Autocallable Income ETF) tracks NYSE U.S. 500 Adaptive Vol Autocallable Index with an options approach. They are issued by Calamos Investments and VegaShares respectively.
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — CAIQ scores 75, VAIE scores 50, so CAIQ's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.
CAIQ and VAIE both charge the same expense ratio of 0.74%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.
At current distribution rates, $10,000 in CAIQ would pay about $2,047.00 a year (about $170.58 per monthly distribution). $10,000 in VAIE would pay about $1,709.00 a year (about $32.87 per weekly distribution).
CAIQ has outpaced VAIE over the year to date, posting a 3.92% total return against -6.94%. CAIQ has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 14.3% against 21.3% for VAIE. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Generated October 31, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
CAIQ and VAIE are both equity ETFs that generate income through autocallable structured products—financial instruments that trigger early redemption if underlying equity indexes hit specified thresholds. Both employ downside protection features and carry identical expense ratios, but they differ materially in payout frequency, yield, and underlying equity exposure. That 3.38 percentage-point gap reflects different autocallable laddering and payout schedules, not a cost difference—both charge 0.74% in fees.
Second, they track different universes. CAIQ's Nasdaq tilt introduces sector concentration risk; VAIE's approach is designed for broader equity market participation.
CAIQ: Fits investors seeking concentrated exposure to high-growth large-cap technology stocks who want monthly income distribution and can tolerate a growth-tilted equity autocallable structure.
VAIE: Designed for income seekers who prefer weekly distributions, broader large-cap U.S. equity exposure, and a laddered autocallable approach that resets more frequently than monthly payouts.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.