DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

AMZN vs AMZW: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amazon.com, Inc. and Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

ETFs55
Total AUM$28.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on AMZW.

Side-by-side snapshot

AMZNAMZW
Full nameAmazon.com, Inc.Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF
IssuerRoundhill Investments
Last Close$245.98 as of July 8, 2026$37.02 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield24.72%
Distribution Safety Score 38
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$35.1M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying indexAmazon (AMZN)
ObjectiveOperates as an online retailer and web services provider. Segments include North America, International, and Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud computing platform.AMZW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Amazon.com before fees.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A06/18/2025
Beta1.4611.7108
Last dividend$0.1760
Ex-dividend date07/06/2026

Bottom lineChoose AMZN if you want broad equity exposure. Choose AMZW if you want higher current income (24.72% while AMZN makes no distribution).

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

AMZN has outpaced AMZW over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.07% total return against 3.21%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — AMZN has compounded at 14.92% a year versus 8.64% for AMZW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
AMZN8.60%10.07%14.92%31.0%0.170.23-21.7%
AMZW5.25%3.21%8.64%37.6%-0.04-0.05-26.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 18, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

AMZW currently shows a 24.72% distribution yield. AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Who should choose each?

Choose AMZN

Amazon.com, Inc.

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.5 vs 1.7 for AMZW.

Choose AMZW

Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF

  • Want higher current income — AMZW yields 24.72% while AMZN makes no distribution.
  • Want broad equity exposure.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, AMZN has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while AMZW would produce $206.00/month, at current distribution rates.

AMZN yield
AMZW yield24.72%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, AMZN would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,000 for AMZW (simplified, not compounded). The $1,000.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

AMZN ER
AMZW ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

AMZN is a stock, while AMZW tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a leverage approach. Beta is 1.461 for AMZN and 1.7108 for AMZW, indicating AMZN is less volatile relative to the market.

AMZN beta1.461
AMZW beta1.7108

Fund details

AMZN is managed by — (launched 05/15/1997) with — in assets. AMZW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 06/18/2025) with $35.1M in assets.

AMZN AUM
AMZW AUM$35.1M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of AMZN or AMZW pays more dividend income?

AMZW currently reports a distribution yield, while AMZN has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between AMZN and AMZW?

AMZN (Amazon.com, Inc.) is a stock, while AMZW (Roundhill AMZN WeeklyPay ETF) tracks Amazon (AMZN) with a leverage approach. They are issued by — and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both AMZN and AMZW?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, AMZN or AMZW?

AMZN has an expense ratio of — while AMZW charges 1.00%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in AMZN vs AMZW generate?

At current rates, AMZN has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in AMZW would produce about $206.00 per month ($2,472.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, AMZN or AMZW?

AMZN has outpaced AMZW over the trailing twelve months, posting a 10.07% total return against 3.21%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — AMZN has compounded at 14.92% a year versus 8.64% for AMZW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

AMZN vs AMZW — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

AMZN is the common stock of Amazon.com, a mega-cap e-commerce and cloud computing giant with no dividend. AMZW is a newly launched leveraged ETF tracking Amazon's weekly total return at 120% (plus a 1.00% annual fee) and distributing the excess gains as weekly payouts. The key distinction: AMZN is a buy-and-hold equity position; AMZW is a short-term synthetic-income wrapper designed to extract weekly gains via leverage and options mechanics.

How they differ

AMZN is a pure equity holding with no income component—all return comes from price appreciation and reinvested gains. AMZW, by contrast, uses 120% leverage to amplify weekly returns and strips out that excess as a 24.88% annualized distribution paid every week, turning a growth stock into a yield-generating instrument. The leverage comes with structural costs: AMZW's 1.00% expense ratio covers the ETF infrastructure and options trading, but the weekly rebalancing and derivatives overlay create slippage relative to holding AMZN directly. AMZW's beta of 1.7108 reflects the amplified volatility from leverage, versus AMZN's 1.461. Most critically, AMZW's annualized distribution rate of 24.88% far exceeds Amazon's historical earnings growth and reinvestment capacity, raising questions about how much of each payout is return of capital versus genuine alpha from the weekly trading strategy.

Who each is best for

AMZN: Investors seeking exposure to Amazon's long-term growth in retail and cloud infrastructure with no desire for current income—typical for multi-decade holding periods or growth-focused portfolios where capital appreciation is the primary goal.

AMZW: Investors who want weekly distributions from concentrated Amazon exposure and are comfortable accepting leverage, weekly rebalancing drag, and elevated volatility in exchange for near-25% annualized yield, and who can actively monitor a synthetic-income position.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at yields >15%. A 24.88% annualized distribution from a single-stock equity fund implies significant return-of-capital treatment or reliance on the leverage strategy consistently outperforming. Over multi-year horizons, this payout rate is likely to erode the fund's net asset value unless Amazon's underlying total return significantly accelerates.
  • Leverage and volatility amplification. AMZW's 120% notional exposure and 1.7108 beta mean losses are magnified by roughly 20% beyond the underlying stock. A 20% decline in AMZN could translate to a ~24% decline in AMZW before accounting for the distribution bleed.
  • Weekly rebalancing and derivatives slippage. Maintaining 120% constant leverage requires frequent trading and options positioning. Volatility decay, bid-ask spreads, and the time cost of derivatives hedges can accumulate significantly over weeks and months, especially in choppy markets.
  • Single-stock concentration. AMZW holds only Amazon, so company-specific risks—regulatory action, AWS competition, retail margin compression—translate directly to fund performance without diversification buffer.
  • Liquidity and AUM risk. At $35.1M in assets and only a few months old, AMZW is thinly capitalized relative to the broader ETF market. Low trading volume could widen bid-ask spreads and redemption pressures could accelerate if flows reverse.

Bottom line

If you want long-term Amazon exposure and can reinvest capital gains indefinitely, AMZN's simplicity and buy-and-hold mechanics are hard to beat. If you prioritize weekly cash flow and are comfortable with leverage, weekly rebalancing friction, and potential NAV decay, AMZW offers a synthetic-income angle—though the 24.88% payout rate suggests a significant portion will be return of capital rather than sustainable yield. Past performance doesn't predict future results, and AMZW's track record extends back only weeks, making any historical comparison premature.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.