DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ARKK vs OARK: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of ARK Innovation ETF and YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs14
Total AUM$15.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

ARK Invest is known for actively managed ETFs focused on disruptive innovation and emerging technologies across digital assets and innovation themes. The firm operates a lineup of 7 funds targeting growth-oriented investors, including popular tickers like ARKK (flagship innovation fund), ARKG (genomics), ARKW (web innovation), and ARKF (fintech), among others. ARK's funds are characterized by concentrated portfolios of high-conviction stock picks and a research-driven approach to identifying companies positioned to benefit from technological transformation.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ARKK.

ETFs59
Total AUM$9.28B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on OARK.

Side-by-side snapshot

ARKKOARK
Full nameARK Innovation ETFYieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerARK InvestYieldMax
Last Close$74.95 as of July 21, 2026$28.82 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield50.17%
Distribution Safety Score™ 54
Expense ratio0.75%1.19%
AUM$5.96B$53.1M
Distribution frequencyAnnualWeekly
Underlying indexArk Innovation ETF (ARKK)
ObjectiveActively managed ETF seeking long-term capital growth by investing in companies relevant to disruptive innovation.Covered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/31/201411/22/2022
Beta2.461.66
Last dividend$0.2780
Ex-dividend date09/08/202307/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose ARKK if you want broad equity exposure. Choose OARK if you want to maximize current income — roughly 50.17%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: OARK's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while ARKK keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

ARKK has lagged OARK over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.42% total return against 1.04%. The picture flips over 3 years, though — ARKK has compounded at 16.20% a year, ahead of OARK at 8.55%. OARK has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 30.7% against 39.4% for ARKK. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3YVolatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ARKK-4.29%-2.42%16.20%39.4%0.270.39-39.6%
OARK-2.08%1.04%8.55%30.7%0.120.17-35.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Nov 2022” measures every fund from November 23, 2022 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) and OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

OARK currently shows a 50.17% distribution yield. ARKK has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

ARKK is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.75% compared to 1.19%.

ARKK is the larger fund by assets ($5.96B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose ARKK

ARK Innovation ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.75% expense ratio vs 1.19% for OARK.

Choose OARK

YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — OARK distributes roughly 50.17% from selling options premium, while ARKK makes no distribution.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.7 vs 2.5 for ARKK.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ARKK has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while OARK would produce $418.08/month, at current distribution rates.

ARKK yield
OARK yield50.17%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ARKK would cost approximately $750 in fees vs $1,190 for OARK (simplified, not compounded). The $440.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ARKK ER0.75%
OARK ER1.19%

Strategy & risk

ARKK is an ETF, while OARK tracks Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK) with a covered call approach. Beta is 2.46 for ARKK and 1.66 for OARK, indicating OARK is less volatile relative to the market.

ARKK beta2.46
OARK beta1.66

Fund details

ARKK is managed by ARK Invest (launched 10/31/2014) with $5.96B in assets. OARK is managed by YieldMax (launched 11/22/2022) with $53.1M in assets.

ARKK AUM$5.96B
OARK AUM$53.1M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of ARKK or OARK pays more dividend income?

OARK currently reports a distribution yield, while ARKK has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between ARKK and OARK?

ARKK (ARK Innovation ETF) is an ETF, while OARK (YieldMax Innovation Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Ark Innovation ETF (ARKK) with a covered call approach. They are issued by ARK Invest and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both ARKK and OARK?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, ARKK or OARK?

ARKK has an expense ratio of 0.75% while OARK charges 1.19%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ARKK vs OARK generate?

At current rates, ARKK has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in OARK would produce about $418.08 per month ($5,017.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ARKK or OARK?

ARKK has lagged OARK over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.42% total return against 1.04%. The picture flips over 3 years, though — ARKK has compounded at 16.20% a year, ahead of OARK at 8.55%. OARK has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 30.7% against 39.4% for ARKK. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare ARKK with

Popular comparisons

ARKK vs OARK — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

ARKK is an actively managed ETF investing in companies driving disruptive innovation across sectors like genomics, robotics, and artificial intelligence. OARK is a covered-call strategy ETF that holds ARKK shares and systematically sells call options against them to generate income. The key distinction: ARKK pursues capital appreciation through growth stock selection; OARK trades upside capture for high weekly income by writing options on the same underlying.

How they differ

ARKK and OARK track the same innovation theme but pursue opposite income-generation models. ARKK distributes annually and targets long-term capital growth with no option overlay; OARK wraps ARKK in a covered-call strategy, distributing 52.66% annually in weekly payments funded by option premium. This structural difference creates radically different return profiles: ARKK's 2.46 beta reflects growth-stock volatility with no downside cushion, while OARK's 1.66 beta suggests the call overlay caps upside but dampens drawdowns. OARK's 1.19% expense ratio exceeds ARKK's 0.75%, reflecting the cost of managing the derivatives program. OARK's AUM of $50.1M is roughly one-sixth of ARKK's $8.24B, signaling much thinner trading liquidity and a younger fund (inception November 2022 versus October 2014).

Who each is best for

ARKK: Fits investors with a multi-year horizon who seek exposure to high-growth disruptive companies and can tolerate above-market volatility in pursuit of capital appreciation, expecting to reinvest annual distributions.

OARK: Fits investors prioritizing weekly income stream and willing to accept capped upside and principal erosion over time in exchange for consistent option-premium generation, particularly those seeking to systematically reduce their exposure to the same growth theme.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. A 52.66% annual payout rate on covered-call funds typically requires sustained high option premiums or return-of-capital treatment. As volatility contracts or ARKK's valuation tightens, premium income will likely decline, forcing OARK to pay out capital rather than earnings and eroding net asset value over time.
  • Capped upside and opportunity cost. The covered-call structure caps gains when ARKK rallies sharply. Investors in OARK forfeit those gains; over bull-market periods, this mechanical drag can significantly underperform buy-and-hold ARKK holders.
  • Options volatility risk and early assignment. If ARKK moves deeply in-the-money, OARK's short calls may be assigned early, forcing involuntary sales of shares at strike prices below current market value and crystallizing opportunity loss.
  • Concentration and sector overlap. Both funds hold identical ARKK exposure, which is itself a concentrated bet on disruptive innovation. Sector drawdowns in genomics, robotics, or AI will hit both funds hard; holdings overlap is total.
  • Liquidity and bid-ask risk. OARK's $50.1M AUM is substantially smaller than ARKK's, likely producing wider bid-ask spreads and slower order fills, especially in market stress when trading volume often evaporates.

Bottom line

ARKK is a pure-growth play with full upside capture and lower fees; OARK trades that upside for predictable weekly income via options, accepting NAV erosion risk and opportunity cost. If you prioritize long-term capital growth and can tolerate volatility, ARKK's simpler structure and larger fund size offer cleaner execution; if you want steady income and are comfortable capping gains, OARK's high distribution rate may appeal—but verify the sustainability of its payout by monitoring coverage ratios as volatility evolves. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.