DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BABA vs BBYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 9, 2026

ETFs89
Total AUM$13.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BBYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BABABBYY
Full nameAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$111.14 as of July 9, 2026$9.74 as of July 9, 2026
Distribution yield1.38%50.76%
Distribution Safety Score 6336
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$639,927
Distribution frequencyAnnualWeekly
Underlying indexAlibaba (BABA)
ObjectiveSeeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Alibaba Group, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A10/21/2025
Beta0.496
Last dividend$1.0500$0.0951
Ex-dividend date06/11/202607/10/2026

Bottom lineChoose BABA if you want broad equity exposure. Choose BBYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 50.76%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: BBYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while BABA keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.7% against 41.3% for BABA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Oct 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BABA-28.64%-33.32%41.3%-1.50-2.22-47.3%
BBYY-30.57%-31.39%24.7%-2.34-3.17-35.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2025” measures every fund from October 21, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Oct 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Oct 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

BBYY offers the higher yield at 50.76% vs 1.38% for BABA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BABA would generate roughly $11.50/month, while BBYY would produce $423.00/month, at current distribution rates.

BABA yield1.38%
BBYY yield50.76%
Monthly diff on $10K$411.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BABA would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,070 for BBYY (simplified, not compounded). The $1,070.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BABA ER
BBYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

BABA is a stock, while BBYY tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a basket approach.

BABA beta0.496
BBYY beta

Fund details

BABA is managed by — (launched 09/19/2014) with — in assets. BBYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 10/21/2025) with $639,927 in assets.

BABA AUM
BBYY AUM$639,927

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BABA or BBYY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BBYY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BABA and BBYY?

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF) tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a basket approach. They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both BABA and BBYY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BABA or BBYY?

BABA has an expense ratio of — while BBYY charges 1.07%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BABA vs BBYY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BABA would generate roughly $11.50 per month ($138.00 annually). The same in BBYY would produce about $423.00 per month ($5,076.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BABA or BBYY?

BBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 24.7% against 41.3% for BABA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BABA vs BBYY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BABA is Alibaba Group's primary listing, a direct equity stake in China's e-commerce and cloud infrastructure giant. BBYY is a newly launched options-income ETF that sells weekly put spreads on a leveraged Alibaba derivative to generate income, seeking to amplify yield far beyond the underlying stock's 1.38% distribution rate. The comparison is between owning the business itself versus renting volatility on a leveraged proxy of it.

How they differ

The core distinction is strategy: BABA delivers returns from business fundamentals and reinvested earnings, while BBYY generates income by selling short-dated options on a 3x leveraged Alibaba product, aiming for a 49.89% annualized distribution yield. BABA's 0.496 beta shows it moves about half as much as the broad market; BBYY's beta is reported as 0.0, a signal that option collar mechanics flatten market sensitivity in normal conditions. On cost, BABA has no ongoing expense drag, while BBYY charges 1.07% annually. BBYY's inception in October 2025 means it has operated for only weeks—no track record through a full market cycle—while BABA's listing dates to 2014 and has survived multiple regulatory environments. At $639,927 in AUM, BBYY is extremely small and illiquid for an ETF.

Who each is best for

BABA: Fits investors seeking exposure to a diversified Chinese internet and cloud business with modest dividend income and lower volatility relative to the broader market, comfortable with geopolitical and regulatory risk in China.

BBYY: Designed for investors with high risk tolerance and short time horizons who want to harvest weekly option premium from an Alibaba-linked position, understand that the fund's structure can lose capital quickly in adverse market moves, and accept that the income stream may not persist if volatility collapses or the fund closes.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. BBYY's 49.89% annualized payout is a structural red flag. If the underlying options positions lose value or the fund fails to roll spreads profitably, NAV will erode faster than distributions themselves—a dynamic typical of synthetic-income ETFs that distribute far more than the underlying generates in returns.
  • Leverage and convexity risk in BBYY. The fund sells spreads on a 3x leveraged ETF tracking Alibaba, meaning a sharp move in BABA can force the position through the collar and realize losses that outpace simple equity losses. Weekly rolling compounds this: each week, losses materialize and new spreads are sold at potentially worse levels.
  • China regulatory and geopolitical exposure. Both holdings depend on the stability of Alibaba's operating environment. Shifts in antitrust enforcement, data security rules, or capital controls can move both BABA and BBYY sharply and in tandem.
  • Liquidity and size risk in BBYY. At $639,927 in AUM, BBYY is micro-cap. If the fund fails to gain assets, it may be liquidated, forcing you to exit at inopportune prices or unwind option positions at market.
  • Counterparty and roll risk in BBYY. Weekly option sales require the fund to continuously exit and re-enter put spreads. In a gap market or period of high Alibaba volatility, rolling costs can spike or execution can be poor, eroding returns beyond the stated expense ratio.

Bottom line

If you want a proven Chinese tech equity with stable, modest income and two-decade operating history, BABA is the straightforward choice. If you're chasing weekly income from options premium and can absorb rapid NAV swings or total loss, BBYY's extreme yield reflects its extreme complexity and newness—not a gift, but a bet that the fund survives and its roll mechanics stay profitable. Past performance of neither security predicts future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.