DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BABA vs BBYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated June 24, 2026

ETFs51
Total AUM$9.35B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BBYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BABABBYY
Full nameAlibaba Group Holding Ltd.GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$102.60 as of June 24, 2026$9.94 as of June 24, 2026
Distribution yield1.29%52.31%
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$639,927
Distribution frequencyAnnualWeekly
Underlying indexAlibaba (BABA)
ObjectiveSeeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Alibaba Group, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/19/201410/21/2025
Beta0.46
Last dividend$1.0500$0.1000
Ex-dividend date06/11/202610/24/2025

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.1% against 39.7% for BABA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Oct 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BABA-34.12%-38.44%39.7%-1.96-2.79-43.0%
BBYY-29.17%-30.01%25.1%-2.32-3.15-32.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of June 23, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2025” measures every fund from October 21, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Oct 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Oct 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

BBYY offers the higher yield at 52.31% vs 1.29% for BABA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BABA would generate roughly $10.75/month, while BBYY would produce $435.92/month, at current distribution rates.

BABA yield1.29%
BBYY yield52.31%
Monthly diff on $10K$425.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BABA would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,070 for BBYY (simplified, not compounded). The $1,070.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BABA ER
BBYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

BABA is a stock, while BBYY tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a basket approach.

BABA beta0.46
BBYY beta

Fund details

BABA is managed by — (launched 09/19/2014) with — in assets. BBYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 10/21/2025) with $639,927 in assets.

BABA AUM
BBYY AUM$639,927

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BABA or BBYY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BBYY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BABA and BBYY?

BABA (Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.) is a stock, while BBYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST BBY ETF) tracks Alibaba (BABA) with a basket approach. They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both BABA and BBYY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BABA or BBYY?

BABA has an expense ratio of — while BBYY charges 1.07%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BABA vs BBYY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BABA would generate roughly $10.75 per month ($129.00 annually). The same in BBYY would produce about $435.92 per month ($5,231.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BABA or BBYY?

BBYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 25.1% against 39.7% for BABA. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.