DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BIL vs JPST: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • BILInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • JPSTInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

BIL has outpaced JPST over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.66% total return against 3.48%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — JPST has compounded at 3.77% a year, ahead of BIL at 3.65%. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.6% for JPST. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualizedSince May 2017Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BIL2.61%3.66%4.46%3.65%2.43%0.2%-0.51-0.80-0.0%
JPST2.24%3.48%4.94%3.77%2.98%0.6%0.620.90-0.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2017” measures every fund from May 19, 2017 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBILJPST
Full nameSPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFJPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF
IssuerState StreetJPMorgan
Underlying indexBloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill IndexBasket
Last Close$91.64 as of September 30, 2026$50.37 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate3.66%4.10%
Trailing 12-month yield3.71%4.17%
Distribution Safety Score™ ——
Expense ratio0.1353%0.18%
AUM$48.1B$41.8B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Provides pure short-term Treasury exposure with minimal credit risk.Seeks to provide current income while seeking to maintain a low volatility of principal by investing in a diversified portfolio of short-term, investment-grade fixed and floating-rate debt. Offers a slight yield boost over pure Treasury exposure.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/25/200705/17/2017
Beta0.060.06
Last dividend$0.27977$0.172
Ex-dividend date09/01/202609/01/2026

Bottom lineBIL and JPST are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs179
Total AUM$2148B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BIL.

ETFs78
Total AUM$350B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan is a major provider of ETFs spanning multiple asset classes and strategies, with particular strength in income-focused funds including their popular covered call strategy lineup. Their fund family encompasses broad categories including bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, municipal, and sector ETFs, providing investors with diverse exposure options across markets and investment styles. The issuer offers both core indexed strategies and actively managed solutions, serving investors seeking everything from traditional dividend income to sophisticated factor-based and thematic approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on JPST.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

JPST offers the higher yield at 4.10% vs 3.66% for BIL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BIL is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.1353% compared to 0.18%.

They have different reference exposures: BIL is linked to Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index while JPST is linked to Basket, which means their performance drivers differ.

BIL is the larger fund by assets ($48.1B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BIL would generate roughly $30.50 cash per distribution, while JPST would produce $34.17 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BIL yield3.66%
JPST yield4.10%
Cash diff on $10K$3.67

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BIL would cost approximately $135 in fees vs $180 for JPST (simplified, not compounded). The $44.70 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BIL ER0.1353%
JPST ER0.18%

Strategy & risk

BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while JPST tracks Basket with a money market approach.

BIL beta0.06
JPST beta0.06

Fund details

BIL is managed by State Street (launched 05/25/2007) with $48.1B in assets. JPST is managed by JPMorgan (launched 05/17/2017) with $41.8B in assets.

BIL AUM$48.1B
JPST AUM$41.8B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for BIL and JPST?

BIL currently distributes 3.66% and JPST 4.10%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BIL or JPST better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. JPST currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BIL and JPST?

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while JPST (JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF) tracks Basket with a money market approach. They are issued by State Street and JPMorgan respectively.

Can I hold both BIL and JPST?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BIL or JPST?

BIL has an expense ratio of 0.1353% while JPST charges 0.18%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BIL vs JPST generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BIL would generate roughly $30.50 cash per distribution ($366.00 annually). The same in JPST would produce about $34.17 cash per distribution ($410.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BIL or JPST?

BIL has outpaced JPST over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.66% total return against 3.48%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — JPST has compounded at 3.77% a year, ahead of BIL at 3.65%. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.6% for JPST. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BIL vs JPST — at a glance

Generated September 26, 2026.

Overview

BIL and JPST are both ultra-short fixed-income ETFs designed to deliver stable monthly income with minimal principal volatility. BIL holds exclusively Treasury bills maturing in one to three months, making it a pure-play government debt vehicle. JPST holds a diversified basket of investment-grade short-term debt—corporates, agencies, and securitized instruments—alongside Treasuries, trading a small credit risk for higher yield. This drives the yield gap—JPST's 4.10% outpaces BIL's 3.66% by roughly 44 basis points, compensating investors for credit exposure. On cost, BIL charges 0.1353% versus JPST's 0.18%, a modest 2.5 basis point spread. Both trade monthly distributions and carry identical 0.06 beta, signaling similar price stability. AUM differs noticeably: BIL commands $48.1B against JPST's $41.8B, reflecting BIL's earlier 05/25/2007 launch and its role as a flagship Treasury exposure vehicle.

Who each is best for

BIL: Investors prioritizing zero credit risk and maximum simplicity—those who view this sleeve as a cash equivalent and want nothing but U.S. government backing, even if yield is the trade-off.

JPST: Investors comfortable with investment-grade credit exposure and willing to accept modest default risk in exchange for a meaningfully higher coupon, particularly those assembling a core fixed-income allocation where a small yield pickup improves blended returns.

Key risks to know

  • Credit concentration in JPST: The fund's yield advantage relies on corporate and agency holdings. Widening credit spreads or deterioration in short-term corporate credit conditions could compress returns and narrow the yield advantage over BIL.
  • Rate sensitivity and reinvestment: Both funds hold short-maturity instruments, so principal is minimally affected by rate moves, but rising rates will depress new-purchase yields on rollover. Falling rates reverse this benefit. Neither fund isolates investors from reinvestment timing.
  • Liability mismatches in JPST: Ultra-short corporate and agency debt can exhibit wider bid-ask spreads and lower liquidity than comparable Treasuries during stress periods, potentially affecting exit pricing if large redemptions occur.
  • JPST duration concentration: Although labeled "ultra-short," the fund's blended maturity may extend modestly beyond BIL's 1–3 month Treasury window, creating fractionally greater principal sensitivity to yield curve moves.

Bottom line

If you prize absolute safety and pure government backing, BIL's all-Treasury structure and lower expense ratio fit that need; if you're seeking higher income within the investment-grade short-duration space and accept modest credit risk, JPST's 44 basis point yield advantage may justify the extra 2.5 basis points in fees. Both offer monthly income and negligible volatility—the choice turns on whether you're willing to trade zero credit risk for material yield improvement. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.