DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BIL vs SHY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • BILInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • SHYInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.70% total return against 1.15%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.30% a year, against 1.60% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince May 2007Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BIL2.67%3.70%4.47%3.66%2.30%1.41%0.2%-0.48-0.75-0.0%
SHY0.15%1.15%3.89%1.68%1.60%1.79%1.6%-0.41-0.58-1.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2007” measures every fund from May 30, 2007 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBILSHY
Full nameSPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerState StreetiShares
Underlying indexBloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
Last Close$91.43 as of October 2, 2026$81.05 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate3.45%3.57%
Trailing 12-month yield3.67%3.63%
Distribution Safety Score™ —95
Safety-Adjusted Yield —3.39%
Expense ratio0.1353%0.15%
AUM$48.1B$26.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Provides pure short-term Treasury exposure with minimal credit risk.Tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/25/200707/22/2002
Beta0.060.22
Last dividend$0.26318 declared, pays 10/06/2026$0.241 declared, pays 10/06/2026
Ex-dividend date10/01/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineBIL and SHY are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs179
Total AUM$2146B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BIL.

ETFs466
Total AUM$4683B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SHY offers the higher yield at 3.57% vs 3.45% for BIL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BIL is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.1353% compared to 0.15%.

They have different reference exposures: BIL is linked to Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index while SHY is linked to ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

BIL is the larger fund by assets ($48.1B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BIL would generate roughly $28.75 cash per distribution, while SHY would produce $29.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BIL yield3.45%
SHY yield3.57%
Cash diff on $10K$1.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BIL would cost approximately $135 in fees vs $150 for SHY (simplified, not compounded). The $14.70 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BIL ER0.1353%
SHY ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Beta is 0.06 for BIL and 0.22 for SHY, making BIL the less volatile of the two by this measure.

BIL beta0.06
SHY beta0.22

Fund details

BIL is managed by State Street (launched 05/25/2007) with $48.1B in assets. SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $26.2B in assets.

BIL AUM$48.1B
SHY AUM$26.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for BIL and SHY?

BIL currently distributes 3.45% and SHY 3.57%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BIL or SHY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SHY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BIL and SHY?

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They are issued by State Street and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BIL and SHY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BIL or SHY?

BIL has an expense ratio of 0.1353% while SHY charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BIL vs SHY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BIL would generate roughly $28.75 cash per distribution ($345.00 annually). The same in SHY would produce about $29.75 cash per distribution ($357.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BIL or SHY?

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.70% total return against 1.15%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.30% a year, against 1.60% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

BIL vs SHY — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

BIL and SHY are both Treasury-focused ETFs that track short-dated U.S. government debt, but they differ fundamentally in maturity. BIL holds Treasury bills with maturities of one to three months, functioning as a cash-equivalent vehicle with minimal interest-rate sensitivity. SHY holds Treasury bonds with one- to three-year maturities, offering slightly higher yield in exchange for modest duration risk and price volatility.

How they differ

The most important difference is maturity structure. BIL's 1–3 month bills behave like money-market instruments with near-zero interest-rate risk; SHY's 1–3 year bonds carry measurable duration risk and will fluctuate in price as rates move. This shows up in beta: BIL's is 0.06, while SHY's is 0.22, reflecting SHY's greater sensitivity to rate changes. Yield is nearly identical—3.45% for BIL and 3.57% for SHY—because short-end Treasury rates are tightly correlated, though SHY's slightly higher payout reflects its longer duration. SHY is also larger by AUM ($26.2B versus $48.1B) and has been in existence longer, though both charge minimal expense ratios (0.1353% and 0.15%, a difference of 0.01%).

Who each is best for

BIL: Investors who want a cash-like parking place with modest yield pickup and virtually no interest-rate risk—suitable for emergency reserves, near-term spending buckets, or portions of a portfolio requiring maximum stability.

SHY: Investors willing to accept modest price volatility and duration exposure in exchange for a slightly longer return-collection window and the opportunity to benefit from a steepening yield curve or declining rates.

Key risks to know

  • Duration risk (SHY only). SHY's one- to three-year maturity profile means its net asset value will decline if Treasury yields rise materially. BIL has minimal rate sensitivity and will not experience meaningful mark-to-market losses from rate moves.
  • Reinvestment timing (BIL). Bills mature constantly and cash is reinvested into new issues. In a falling-rate environment, maturing proceeds roll into lower-yielding bills, which may compress returns over time.
  • Yield compression in low-rate regimes. Both funds' distributions will move lower if the Fed lowers short-term rates. BIL is more sensitive to Fed policy changes, while SHY will lag but may benefit from price appreciation as longer-dated yields fall.
  • Minimal credit risk. Both hold direct Treasury obligations backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, so default risk is not a distinguishing concern.

Bottom line

If you need cash-like behavior with minimal volatility, BIL's ultra-short duration and 0.06 beta make it essentially a Treasury money-market fund. If you can tolerate modest price swings for a slightly longer income window, SHY offers similar yields with a 0.22 beta and exposure to the 1–3 year part of the curve. Both are low-cost core holdings, but they solve different portfolio problems: stability versus modest duration positioning. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.