DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BIL vs SHY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs182
Total AUM$2107B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BIL.

ETFs481
Total AUM$4451B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

Side-by-side snapshot

BILSHY
Full nameSPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerState StreetiShares
Last Close$91.44 as of July 4, 2026$81.94 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield3.51%3.49%
Distribution Safety Score70
Expense ratio0.14%0.15%
AUM$47.8B$25.3B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexBloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
ObjectiveSeeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Provides pure short-term Treasury exposure with minimal credit risk.Tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/25/200707/22/2002
Beta0.060.23
Last dividend$0.2676$0.2383
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/03/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.28% total return against 2.37%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.15% a year, against 1.57% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.7% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince May 2007Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BIL1.18%3.28%4.41%3.36%2.15%1.35%0.3%-0.51-0.61-0.3%
SHY0.05%2.37%4.08%1.68%1.57%1.81%1.7%-0.28-0.40-1.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2007” measures every fund from May 30, 2007 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BIL offers the higher yield at 3.51% vs 3.49% for SHY. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BIL is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.14% compared to 0.15%.

They track different benchmarks: BIL is linked to Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

BIL is the larger fund by assets ($47.8B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BIL would generate roughly $29.25/month, while SHY would produce $29.08/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BIL yield3.51%
SHY yield3.49%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BIL would cost approximately $140 in fees vs $150 for SHY (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BIL ER0.14%
SHY ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index with a basket approach. Beta is 0.06 for BIL and 0.23 for SHY, indicating BIL is less volatile relative to the market.

BIL beta0.06
SHY beta0.23

Fund details

BIL is managed by State Street (launched 05/25/2007) with $47.8B in assets. SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $25.3B in assets.

BIL AUM$47.8B
SHY AUM$25.3B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is BIL or SHY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. BIL currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BIL and SHY?

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index with a basket approach. They are issued by State Street and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BIL and SHY?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, BIL or SHY?

BIL has an expense ratio of 0.14% while SHY charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BIL vs SHY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BIL would generate roughly $29.25 per month ($351.00 annually). The same in SHY would produce about $29.08 per month ($349.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BIL or SHY?

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.28% total return against 2.37%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.15% a year, against 1.57% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.3% against 1.7% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BIL with

People also compare SHY with

Popular comparisons

BIL vs SHY — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

BIL and SHY are both Treasury-focused ETFs offering monthly income, but they target different points on the yield curve. BIL holds bills maturing in 1–3 months; SHY holds bonds maturing in 1–3 years. That maturity gap creates the core trade-off: BIL offers near-zero duration risk and money-market stability, while SHY trades slightly higher interest-rate sensitivity for a longer lock-in on yields.

How they differ

The biggest difference is maturity: BIL holds Treasury bills (shortest-term government debt), while SHY holds Treasury notes (1–3 year maturity). That difference shows up in beta—BIL's 0.06 versus SHY's 0.23—meaning SHY moves more with broader bond-market swings. The yield spread between them is negligible (3.53% for BIL versus 3.55% for SHY), so BIL delivers nearly the same income with drastically lower price volatility. Both charge modest fees (0.14% and 0.15% respectively) and pay monthly, but BIL is significantly larger at $47.8B in AUM versus $25.3B for SHY. SHY has a slightly longer track record (inception July 2002 versus May 2007 for BIL).

Who each is best for

BIL: Fits investors who need stable principal, liquid emergency reserves, or a parking spot for cash that would otherwise sit idle in a bank account. Appeals to those uncomfortable with bond-price volatility or seeking to minimize duration risk while still capturing near-risk-free yields.

SHY: Designed for investors willing to tolerate modest interest-rate sensitivity in exchange for a steady income stream with predictable maturity profiles. Suits allocations where a small equity or commodity hedge exists elsewhere and slightly longer duration is acceptable or desired.

Key risks to know

  • Interest-rate sensitivity: SHY's beta of 0.23 means a 1% rise in Treasury yields will pressure its NAV roughly twice as much as BIL's. Over a multi-year cycle of rising rates, SHY holders could face mark-to-market losses; BIL's short maturity buffers that risk almost entirely.
  • Reinvestment risk: BIL's 1–3 month holdings roll over constantly. If yields fall sharply, reinvested proceeds capture lower rates quickly. SHY's longer maturity stretches that risk over years, locking in current yields longer but also locking in opportunity cost if rates rise.
  • Duration uncertainty: SHY's 1–3 year bucket is wider than it appears; bonds maturing in 3 years have meaningfully more price sensitivity than those maturing in 1 year. BIL faces no such surprise because its bills mature so soon.

Bottom line

If you want Treasury exposure with virtually no price volatility and don't need to stretch for yield, BIL's money-market simplicity and larger scale stand out. If you're comfortable with modest interest-rate risk and want slightly longer-term Treasury holdings with still-low expenses and monthly distributions, SHY offers a middle ground. Past performance does not predict future results; both funds' income and principal value will shift with Treasury supply, demand, and Fed policy.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.