DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BIL vs SHY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF and iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • BILInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.
  • SHYInvestors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.78% total return against 2.59%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.26% a year, against 1.66% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince May 2007Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BIL2.22%3.78%4.53%3.58%2.26%1.40%0.2%-0.19-0.31-0.0%
SHY0.78%2.59%4.19%1.81%1.66%1.84%1.6%-0.23-0.33-1.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2007” measures every fund from May 30, 2007 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBILSHY
Full nameSPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFiShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerState StreetiShares
Last Close$91.56 as of August 19, 2026$82.02 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield3.58%3.67%
Distribution Safety Score™ 7074
Expense ratio0.14%0.15%
AUM$46.7B$25.5B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexBloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill IndexICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index
ObjectiveSeeks to provide investment results that correspond to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Provides pure short-term Treasury exposure with minimal credit risk.Tracks the ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date05/25/200707/22/2002
Beta0.060.22
Last dividend$0.2730$0.2508
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/03/2026

Bottom lineBIL and SHY are both for investors who want fixed-income ballast that steadies the portfolio when stocks fall — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Fees and payouts are close too, so it comes down to which your broker offers commission-free and any share-price or tax-lot preference.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs180
Total AUM$2169B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BIL.

ETFs473
Total AUM$4710B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SHY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) and SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SHY offers the higher yield at 3.67% vs 3.58% for BIL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

BIL is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.14% compared to 0.15%.

They track different benchmarks: BIL is linked to Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

BIL is the larger fund by assets ($46.7B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BIL would generate roughly $29.83/month, while SHY would produce $30.58/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

BIL yield3.58%
SHY yield3.67%
Monthly diff on $10K$0.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BIL would cost approximately $140 in fees vs $150 for SHY (simplified, not compounded). The $10.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BIL ER0.14%
SHY ER0.15%

Strategy & risk

BIL tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. Beta is 0.06 for BIL and 0.22 for SHY, making BIL the less volatile of the two by this measure.

BIL beta0.06
SHY beta0.22

Fund details

BIL is managed by State Street (launched 05/25/2007) with $46.7B in assets. SHY is managed by iShares (launched 07/22/2002) with $25.5B in assets.

BIL AUM$46.7B
SHY AUM$25.5B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for BIL and SHY?

BIL currently distributes 3.58% and SHY 3.67%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is BIL or SHY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SHY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between BIL and SHY?

BIL (SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Month T-Bill ETF) tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index with a money market approach, while SHY (iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF) tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Bond Index. They are issued by State Street and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both BIL and SHY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is BIL or SHY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SHY scores 74, BIL scores 70, so SHY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. BIL has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.06 vs 0.22 for SHY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, BIL or SHY?

BIL has an expense ratio of 0.14% while SHY charges 0.15%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BIL vs SHY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in BIL would generate roughly $29.83 per month ($358.00 annually). The same in SHY would produce about $30.58 per month ($367.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BIL or SHY?

BIL has outpaced SHY over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.78% total return against 2.59%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: BIL has compounded at 2.26% a year, against 1.66% for SHY. BIL has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 0.2% against 1.6% for SHY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BIL with

People also compare SHY with

Popular comparisons

BIL vs SHY — at a glance

Generated August 16, 2026.

Overview

BIL and SHY are both Treasury-focused ETFs offering monthly distributions, but they occupy different points on the maturity spectrum. BIL holds Treasury bills with maturities of 1–3 months, functioning as a cash-like instrument with near-zero interest-rate risk. SHY holds Treasury bonds with 1–3 year maturities, offering slightly higher yield in exchange for material duration exposure. The choice between them hinges on whether you want stability of principal or willingness to accept price fluctuation for incremental income.

How they differ

The core distinction is maturity: BIL's 1–3 month bills carry minimal duration risk (beta of 0.06), while SHY's 1–3 year bonds have meaningful interest-rate sensitivity (beta of 0.22). This translates to NAV behavior—when rates rise, BIL's price barely moves, whereas SHY can see 2–4% declines. Both distribute monthly, but SHY yields 3.67% versus BIL's 3.58%, a gap that narrows when short rates rise relative to intermediate rates. SHY has been around longer (inception July 2002) and manages $25.5B in assets; BIL launched in May 2007 and holds $46.7B, making it the larger vehicle. Expense ratios are nearly identical (0.15% for SHY, 0.14% for BIL), so fees won't be a differentiator.

Who each is best for

BIL: Fits investors seeking a stable, ultra-liquid Treasury vehicle with minimal principal risk—those who view it as a high-yielding cash substitute rather than a bond investment and prioritize consistency of NAV over incremental yield.

SHY: Fits investors comfortable with modest duration exposure and 1–3 year interest-rate cycles who want a modest yield pickup over bill rates and can tolerate quarterly or seasonal price swings tied to Fed policy.

Key risks to know

  • Duration risk (SHY): With a beta of 0.22, SHY's NAV will move meaningfully when Treasury yields shift. A 1% rise in interest rates could produce a 2–3% loss; conversely, falling rates can drive appreciation. BIL, by contrast, has almost no such risk at beta 0.06.
  • Reinvestment risk (BIL): Because BIL holds 1–3 month bills, its portfolio rolls over frequently. If rates fall sharply, new bills maturing into the fund will yield less, causing the distribution to compress. Conversely, rising rates favor the fund, but investors shouldn't expect the current 3.58% yield to persist indefinitely.
  • Yield compression in low-rate environments: Both funds derive income from the level of Treasury yields. In a prolonged low-rate regime, distributions could fall materially. Conversely, a sustained high-rate cycle favors both, though BIL resets faster (monthly maturity turnover).
  • Opportunity cost (BIL): Ultra-short maturities mean BIL is unlikely to capture capital gains if the yield curve steepens or rates decline. Investors sacrificing potential price appreciation for stability should understand that tradeoff.

Bottom line

BIL is a Treasury cash equivalent with virtually no interest-rate risk; SHY adds 3–9 basis points of yield in exchange for meaningful duration exposure. If you want a high-yielding parking spot with stable NAV, BIL's scale ($46.7B) and minimal beta make it distinct. If you're comfortable with a 1–3 year bond holding and can tolerate price movement alongside Fed cycles, SHY's slightly higher yield and longer maturity profile may fit a broader fixed-income sleeve. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and yields will move with Treasury rates.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.