DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

BITB vs FBTC: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Bitwise Bitcoin ETF and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 16, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

BITB has outpaced FBTC over the trailing twelve months, posting a -24.91% total return against -24.92%. Measured from Jan 2024 — the start of shared available history — FBTC has compounded at 22.03% a year versus 21.96% for BITB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Jan 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
BITB-7.06%-24.91%21.96%45.3%-0.73-1.01-49.0%
FBTC-7.06%-24.92%22.03%45.2%-0.73-1.00-49.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jan 2024” measures every fund from January 11, 2024 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Not a distribution payer

BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. BITB is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield. FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. FBTC is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricBITBFBTC
Full nameBitwise Bitcoin ETFFidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund
IssuerBitwise InvestmentsFidelity Investments
Last Close$44.20 as of October 16, 2026$70.85 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate——
Distribution Safety Score™ ——
Expense ratio0.20%0.25%
AUM$3.07B$14.7B
Distribution frequencyNoneNone
Underlying indexBitcoinBitcoin
ObjectiveTracks the value of bitcoin held in custody on behalf of the fund.Bitcoin spot exposure through an exchange-traded bitcoin fund structure.
Asset classCurrencyCurrency
Inception date01/10/202401/10/2024
Beta1.8841.8779

Bottom lineBITB and FBTC are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar bitcoin spot exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: BITB is cheaper at 0.20% vs 0.25%.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Crypto volatility. BITB and FBTC sit on top of crypto-asset prices, which routinely swing far more than equities. A single drawdown can exceed a year of distributions, so income projections deserve extra skepticism here.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs15
Total AUM$7.33B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Bitwise Investments is known for pioneering cryptocurrency and digital asset ETFs, bringing exposure to bitcoin, ethereum, and other blockchain-based assets to mainstream investors. The firm's fund lineup spans digital assets—including single-asset and diversified cryptocurrency funds—alongside income-focused strategies that blend traditional dividend approaches with digital asset themes. The issuer has established a distinctive niche in the crypto ETF space while maintaining a footprint in conventional income investing, offering investors varied exposure levels to both emerging digital asset classes and yield-generating strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BITB.

ETFs85
Total AUM$210B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Fidelity Investments is one of the largest asset managers globally and maintains a substantial presence in the ETF market with a diverse lineup spanning multiple investment strategies. Their offerings cover a wide spectrum of approaches including traditional dividend and income strategies, factor-based and thematic investing, international equity exposure, bond allocations, and index-tracking funds. The issuer is known for both broad market accessibility and specialized strategies, serving investors across various risk profiles and investment objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on FBTC.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BITB is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.20% compared to 0.25%.

FBTC is the larger fund by assets ($14.7B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BITB has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while FBTC has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

BITB yield—
FBTC yield—

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BITB would cost approximately $200 in fees vs $250 for FBTC (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BITB ER0.20%
FBTC ER0.25%

Strategy & risk

Both BITB and FBTC wrap Bitcoin with similar strategies (crypto and crypto). The practical differences are yield target, fee structure, and issuer track record — not the underlying mechanic. Beta is 1.884 for BITB and 1.8779 for FBTC — effectively similar market sensitivity.

BITB beta1.884
FBTC beta1.8779

Fund details

BITB is managed by Bitwise Investments (launched 01/10/2024) with $3.07B in assets. FBTC is managed by Fidelity Investments (launched 01/10/2024) with $14.7B in assets.

BITB AUM$3.07B
FBTC AUM$14.7B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of BITB or FBTC pays more dividend income?

Neither BITB nor FBTC currently reports a distribution yield, so neither is an income fund today. Compare them on holdings, cost, and total return instead.

What is the difference between BITB and FBTC?

Both BITB (Bitwise Bitcoin ETF) and FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) track Bitcoin with similar approaches — the labels "crypto" and "crypto" describe closely related mechanics. The real differences show up in yield target (— vs —), expense ratio (0.20% vs 0.25%), and issuer (Bitwise Investments vs Fidelity Investments).

Can I hold both BITB and FBTC?

You can, but expect significant overlap. Both funds use similar strategies on Bitcoin, so holding them together gives you two wrappers around effectively the same exposure — not true diversification. Weigh issuer, fee, and yield differences rather than treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BITB or FBTC?

BITB has an expense ratio of 0.20% while FBTC charges 0.25%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BITB vs FBTC generate?

At current rates, BITB does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate. FBTC does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate.

Which has performed better historically, BITB or FBTC?

BITB has outpaced FBTC over the trailing twelve months, posting a -24.91% total return against -24.92%. Measured from Jan 2024 — the start of shared available history — FBTC has compounded at 22.03% a year versus 21.96% for BITB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BITB with

People also compare FBTC with

Popular comparisons

BITB vs FBTC — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

BITB and FBTC are both ETFs providing direct exposure to bitcoin held in custody. They track the same underlying asset and launched on the same date, but differ in issuer, asset base, and fee structure. Both are designed to offer straightforward spot bitcoin exposure without the custody or operational friction of holding the cryptocurrency directly.

How they differ

The biggest difference is scale: FBTC has $14.7B in assets under management versus $3.07B for BITB, giving Fidelity's fund a substantially larger footprint in the bitcoin ETF market. FBTC's expense ratio of 0.25% is 0.05% basis points higher than BITB's 0.20%, though both fees are competitive for spot bitcoin exposure. The funds are functionally identical in structure—both hold bitcoin in custody and distribute no income—so the choice hinges on fee preference, issuer trust, and available trading venues rather than strategic differences.

Who each is best for

BITB: Investors who value a lower expense ratio and are comfortable with a newer, smaller bitcoin ETF from a crypto-specialized manager. Fits allocation strategies where fee minimization on spot bitcoin exposure is a priority.

Key risks to know

  • Bitcoin price volatility: Both funds have a beta near 1.884, meaning they move roughly in lockstep with bitcoin's price swings. Holders face the full force of cryptocurrency market dislocations, including intraday drawdowns that can exceed 20% in severe market stress.
  • Regulatory and custody risk: Bitcoin remains an unregulated commodity. Changes in U.S. regulatory treatment, state-level restrictions, or questions about the status of spot bitcoin ETFs themselves could affect fund viability and asset holders' legal standing.
  • Liquidity and trading spreads in stress scenarios: Although both funds launched recently and have grown quickly, their relative newness means limited history through severe crypto downturns. Trading activity could thin significantly during panic selling, widening the cost to enter or exit positions. If you favor a larger, well-established issuer with greater institutional backing and AUM, FBTC's $14.7B and Fidelity's brand carry their own weight. Both are tax-efficient (no distributions means no annual income tax on unrealized gains), but neither protects against bitcoin's inherent volatility or the regulatory uncertainty that surrounds cryptocurrency assets. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.