ETF Comparison

BITQ vs BLOK: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 8, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

BITQInvestors who want straightforward crypto exposure for the long run.
BLOKInvestors who want higher current income (0.14% while BITQ makes no distribution).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

BITQ has outpaced BLOK over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.94% total return against -18.70%. The picture flips over 5 years, though — BLOK has compounded at 8.67% a year, ahead of BITQ at 1.18%. BLOK has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 40.9% against 62.6% for BITQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
Symbol	YTD cumulative	1Y cumulative	3Y annualized	5Y annualized	Since May 2021	Volatility	Sharpe	Sortino	Max drawdown
BITQ	13.94%	-15.94%	54.90%	1.18%	4.55%	62.6%	0.63	0.94	-51.2%
BLOK	0.67%	-18.70%	47.28%	8.67%	8.10%	40.9%	0.84	1.23	-35.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 9, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since May 2021” measures every fund from May 10, 2021 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Not a distribution payer

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. BITQ is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
Metric	BITQ	BLOK
Full name	Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF	Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF
Issuer	Bitwise Investments	Amplify ETFs
Last Close	$23.71 as of October 8, 2026	$58.76 as of October 8, 2026
Distribution rate	—	0.14%
Trailing 12-month yield	—	0.83%
Distribution Safety Score™	—	79
Safety-Adjusted Yield	—	0.11%
Expense ratio	0.85%	0.70%
AUM	$446M	$1.11B
Distribution frequency	None	Annual
Underlying index	—	—
Objective	Invests in companies participating in the crypto ecosystem.	Actively managed fund investing at least 80% of assets in equities of companies actively involved in the development and utilization of blockchain technologies, spanning crypto miners, exchanges, and enablers. Renamed from the Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF in October 2025.
Asset class	Equity	Equity
Inception date	04/27/2021	01/16/2018
Beta	3.36	2.47
Last dividend	—	$0.07985
Ex-dividend date	12/30/2024	06/29/2026

Bottom lineChoose BITQ if you want straightforward crypto exposure for the long run. Choose BLOK if you want higher current income (0.14% while BITQ makes no distribution).

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

Crypto volatility. BITQ and BLOK sit on top of crypto-asset prices, which routinely swing far more than equities. A single drawdown can exceed a year of distributions, so income projections deserve extra skepticism here.

Model this comparison:

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Bitwise Investments

ETFs15

Total AUM$7.56B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Bitwise Investments is known for pioneering cryptocurrency and digital asset ETFs, bringing exposure to bitcoin, ethereum, and other blockchain-based assets to mainstream investors. The firm's fund lineup spans digital assets—including single-asset and diversified cryptocurrency funds—alongside income-focused strategies that blend traditional dividend approaches with digital asset themes. The issuer has established a distinctive niche in the crypto ETF space while maintaining a footprint in conventional income investing, offering investors varied exposure levels to both emerging digital asset classes and yield-generating strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BITQ.

See all Bitwise Investments ETFs

Amplify ETFs

ETFs46

Total AUM$16.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BLOK.

See all Amplify ETFs ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

BLOK currently shows a 0.14% distribution yield. BITQ has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

BLOK is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.70% compared to 0.85%.

BLOK is the larger fund by assets ($1.11B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Still deciding? Track BITQ & BLOK for free

Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.

Add to my watchlist See what a free account includes

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, BITQ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while BLOK would produce $14.00 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

BITQ yield—

BLOK yield0.14%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, BITQ would cost approximately $850 in fees vs $700 for BLOK (simplified, not compounded). The $150.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

BITQ ER0.85%

BLOK ER0.70%

Strategy & risk

BITQ is an ETF, while BLOK is an actively managed ETF. Beta is 3.36 for BITQ and 2.47 for BLOK, making BLOK the less volatile of the two by this measure.

BITQ beta3.36

BLOK beta2.47

Fund details

BITQ is managed by Bitwise Investments (launched 04/27/2021) with $446M in assets. BLOK is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 01/16/2018) with $1.11B in assets.

BITQ AUM$446M

BLOK AUM$1.11B

Ready to act?

Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Frequently asked questions

Which of BITQ or BLOK pays more dividend income?

BLOK currently reports a distribution yield, while BITQ has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between BITQ and BLOK?

BITQ (Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF) is an ETF, while BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) is an actively managed ETF. They are issued by Bitwise Investments and Amplify ETFs respectively.

Can I hold both BITQ and BLOK?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, BITQ or BLOK?

BITQ has an expense ratio of 0.85% while BLOK charges 0.70%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in BITQ vs BLOK generate?

At current rates, BITQ does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate. The same in BLOK would produce about $14.00 cash per distribution ($14.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, BITQ or BLOK?

More comparisons to explore

People also compare BITQ with

People also compare BLOK with

Popular comparisons

BITQ vs BLOK — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

BITQ and BLOK are both equity ETFs focused on blockchain and cryptocurrency technology, but they differ fundamentally in structure and management approach. BITQ is a passive fund tracking companies across the broader crypto ecosystem, while BLOK is actively managed and explicitly concentrates at least 80% of assets in companies directly developing or using blockchain technology—miners, exchanges, and infrastructure providers. BLOK has operated since 2018 (originally under a different mandate); BITQ launched in 2021.

How they differ

The biggest difference is active versus passive management. BLOK's portfolio manager selects and weights holdings, whereas BITQ follows a defined index methodology.

Second, their beta profiles diverge notably. BITQ carries a 3.36 beta versus BLOK's 2.47, meaning BITQ amplifies market swings more aggressively. That higher volatility may reflect a more concentrated or leveraged approach to crypto-adjacent holdings.

Who each is best for

BITQ: Fits investors seeking passive, rules-based exposure to crypto-adjacent companies without active management decisions, and who can tolerate higher volatility in exchange for lower fees.

BLOK: Fits investors who prefer active stock selection within the blockchain space and are willing to pay for manager discretion, or who value a modest annual distribution as part of their strategy.

Key risks to know

Concentrated sector risk. Both funds are entirely dependent on the crypto and blockchain ecosystem's regulatory and adoption trajectory. A sustained downturn in crypto sentiment or adverse regulation could impact both meaningfully, despite their structural differences.

High beta volatility. BITQ's 3.36 beta means it can swing sharply in both directions. Even BLOK's 2.47 beta remains well above the broad market, exposing holders to amplified drawdowns during tech sell-offs.

Active management opacity for BLOK. Investors in actively managed BLOK depend on the manager's stock-picking decisions and rebalancing choices, which may or may not add value relative to a passive approach; there is no guarantee that active selection will outperform the underlying index or BITQ's methodology.

Limited track record for BITQ. With only a few years of history, BITQ lacks a full market cycle of data. Its passive methodology may behave unpredictably during stress periods not yet observed. Both carry significant crypto-sector concentration risk; past performance in a rising crypto market does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.