BLOK
Caution
Limited data
ETF Comparison
BLOK vs TKNZ: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF and T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
No track record yet. TKNZ launched within the last six months. The forward distribution rate is left blank until a payout is published.
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
TKNZ
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  BLOK |  TKNZ |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF | T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF |
| Issuer | Amplify ETFs | T. Rowe Price |
| Last Close | $49.22 as of November 6, 2026 | $28.85 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 0.16% | — |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.99% | — |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 41 | — |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 0.07% | — |
| Expense ratio | 0.70% | 0.75% |
| AUM | $888M | $24.9M |
| Distribution frequency | Annual | Annual |
| Underlying index | Actively managed (no tracked index recorded) | Actively managed (no tracked index recorded) |
| Objective | Actively managed fund investing at least 80% of assets in equities of companies actively involved in the development and utilization of blockchain technologies, spanning crypto miners, exchanges, and enablers. Renamed from the Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF in October 2025. | Seeks long-term capital appreciation through actively managed exposure to a diversified portfolio of crypto assets and crypto-related investments. |
| Asset class | Equity | Crypto |
| Inception date | 01/16/2018 | 07/16/2026 |
| Beta | 2.47 | — |
| Last dividend | $0.07985 | — |
| Ex-dividend date | 06/29/2026 | — |
— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because TKNZ launched July 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
BLOK has lagged TKNZ over the year to date, posting a -16.07% total return against 17.23%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | Since Jul 2026 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOK | -16.07% | -20.04% | 42.5% | -1.77 | -2.30 | -28.9% |
| TKNZ | 17.23% | 17.23% | 42.6% | 1.12 | 1.82 | -16.2% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Jul 2026” measures every fund from July 16, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Jul 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Jul 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineWe won't call this one: TKNZ launched July 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional.
How the risk works
Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.
- Crypto volatility. BLOK and TKNZ sit on top of crypto-asset prices, which routinely swing far more than equities. A single drawdown can exceed a year of distributions, so income projections deserve extra skepticism here.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.
ETFs47
Total AUM$16.5B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on BLOK.
ETFs39
Total AUM$34.6B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
T. Rowe Price is a major asset manager known for building diversified, actively managed ETF portfolios across multiple asset classes and investment styles. Their fund lineup spans bond funds, dividend and income-focused strategies, broad equity exposure, international markets, and thematic equity themes, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer offers a substantial breadth of options with tickers like PABGX and PREIX, appealing to investors seeking professional portfolio management across traditional and specialized investment categories.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on TKNZ.
Quick verdict
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) and TKNZ (T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF) are both annual-pay ETFs, but they take different approaches.
BLOK has paid a 0.99% yield over the past 12 months. TKNZ has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
BLOK is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.70% compared to 0.75%.
BLOK has $888M in assets vs $24.9M for TKNZ, but TKNZ only launched July 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.
Top-holdings overlap
Positions that appear in every fund's top 10. Issuers disclose only the largest weights, so this captures the overlap of the concentrated end of each book — not the full portfolios.
— shared positions
BLOK 0.0% of its top-10 weight
TKNZ top-10 holdings unavailable
Top-10 holdings unavailable for TKNZ — cannot compute overlap.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at the rates paid over the past 12 months, BLOK would pay about $99.00 a year, while TKNZ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available. Both pay annual distributions.
BLOK 12-month yield0.99%
TKNZ yield—
Cost & efficiency
Over 10 years on $10,000, BLOK would cost approximately $700 in fees vs $750 for TKNZ (simplified, not compounded). The $50.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.
BLOK ER0.70%
TKNZ ER0.75%
Strategy & risk
BLOK is an actively managed ETF, while TKNZ is an actively managed ETF built around digital assets exposure.
BLOK beta2.47
TKNZ beta—
Fund details
BLOK is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 01/16/2018) with $888M in assets. TKNZ is managed by T. Rowe Price (launched 07/16/2026) with $24.9M in assets.
BLOK AUM$888M
TKNZ AUM$24.9M
Frequently asked questions
Which of BLOK or TKNZ pays more dividend income?
BLOK currently reports a distribution yield, while TKNZ has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between BLOK and TKNZ?
BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) is an actively managed ETF, while TKNZ (T. Rowe Price Active Crypto ETF) is an actively managed ETF built around digital assets exposure. They are issued by Amplify ETFs and T. Rowe Price respectively.
Can I hold both BLOK and TKNZ?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, BLOK or TKNZ?
BLOK has an expense ratio of 0.70% while TKNZ charges 0.75%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.
How much income does $10,000 in BLOK vs TKNZ generate?
At the rates paid over the past 12 months, $10,000 in BLOK would pay about $99.00 a year. TKNZ has not established a distribution history yet, so a cash estimate is not available.
Which has performed better historically, BLOK or TKNZ?
BLOK has lagged TKNZ over the year to date, posting a -16.07% total return against 17.23%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare BLOK with
People also compare TKNZ with
Popular comparisons
BLOK vs TKNZ — at a glance
Generated November 1, 2026.
The two funds appeal to investors with different views on how to gain crypto exposure: through traditional equity vehicles or through the digital assets themselves. BLOK is substantially larger, with $888M in assets compared to $24.9M, and has been operating since 01/16/2018 versus 07/16/2026 for TKNZ.
- TKNZ: Fits investors who want direct exposure to the crypto asset class itself and are comfortable with the higher volatility and regulatory uncertainty that come with holding digital assets rather than equities in the space.
- Direct asset volatility (TKNZ): Digital assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum experience sharp intraday and multi-day price swings driven by regulatory announcements, macroeconomic shifts, and sentiment. TKNZ's NAV will reflect this volatility directly.
- Regulatory and structural uncertainty (TKNZ): Crypto asset classification, custody standards, tax treatment, and exchange regulation remain unsettled. Changes in U.S. or international policy could affect holdings' liquidity, valuation, or tax efficiency.
- Equity-market sensitivity (BLOK): With a beta of 2.47, BLOK amplifies broad market declines and rallies. During equity selloffs, this sensitivity may produce sharper price moves than crypto assets alone. Redemptions or outflows could create operational challenges as the fund scales. The choice hinges on whether you view blockchain as an equity story or a pure crypto play. Past performance of either fund does not predict future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.