DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

CHPY vs QQQI: Semiconductor or Nasdaq Income?

CHPY combines semiconductor stocks with options income. QQQI combines Nasdaq-100 equities with an index-options overlay. The main choice is a single industry portfolio versus a wider, but still concentrated, large-company universe.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • CHPYInvestors who want semiconductor exposure with an income overlay and accept sector losses.
  • QQQIInvestors who want Nasdaq-100 income exposure and accept index concentration.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

CHPY has outpaced QQQI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 91.04% total return against 18.23%. Measured from Apr 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” CHPY has compounded at 98.75% a year versus 31.15% for QQQI. QQQI has been the steadier holding, though β€” annualized volatility of 16.7% against 40.2% for CHPY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Apr 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
CHPY64.94%91.04%98.75%40.2%1.502.16-27.6%
QQQI14.86%18.23%31.15%16.7%0.731.04-9.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Apr 2025” measures every fund from April 3, 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricCHPYQQQI
Forward distribution rate40.28%13.69%
Trailing 12-month yield40.16%13.76%
30-day SEC yield-0.38%-0.05%
Return of capital99.88%β€”

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on QQQI vs QQQ.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricCHPYQQQI
Full nameYieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETFNEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF
IssuerYieldMaxNEOS
Underlying indexBasket (Semiconductor companies)Nasdaq-100
Last Close$69.51 as of September 30, 2026$55.55 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate40.28%13.69%
Trailing 12-month yield40.16%13.76%
30-day SEC yield-0.38%-0.05%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ 7984
Safety-Adjusted Yield 31.82%11.50%
Expense ratio1.03%0.68%
AUM$1.30B$15.0B
Distribution frequencyWeeklyMonthly
ObjectiveSeeks weekly income by holding a portfolio of U.S.-listed semiconductor equities and generating premium through an options overlay written on those holdings and on semiconductor ETFs.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/02/202501/29/2024
Beta1.86131.0553
Last dividend$0.5385 declared, pays 10/01/2026$0.6339
Ex-dividend date09/30/202609/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose CHPY if you want semiconductor exposure with an income overlay and accept sector losses. Choose QQQI if you want Nasdaq-100 income exposure and accept index concentration. It can increase semiconductor exposure rather than diversify it. Check the combined weights of chip companies already held by QQQI before adding CHPY. Compare reinvested returns over matching dates alongside cash paid and NAV changes; the larger distribution is not necessarily the larger investment gain.

CHPY vs QQQI: Semiconductor or Nasdaq Income?

CHPY combines semiconductor stocks with options income. QQQI combines Nasdaq-100 equities with an index-options overlay. The main choice is a single industry portfolio versus a wider, but still concentrated, large-company universe.

CHPYQQQI
ApproachSemiconductor portfolio with optionsNasdaq-100 stocks and index options
Risk reviewIndustry concentration and option trade-offsLarge-company concentration and options
Expense ratio1.03%0.68%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. CHPY and QQQI generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time β€” the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CHPY.

ETFs19
Total AUM$34.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

CHPY combines semiconductor stocks with options income. QQQI combines Nasdaq-100 equities with an index-options overlay. The main choice is a single industry portfolio versus a wider, but still concentrated, large-company universe.

It can increase semiconductor exposure rather than diversify it. Check the combined weights of chip companies already held by QQQI before adding CHPY. Compare reinvested returns over matching dates alongside cash paid and NAV changes; the larger distribution is not necessarily the larger investment gain.

Deep dive

Measure the combined sector bet

A second ticker is not automatically a new source of risk. Compare the dollar exposure to shared companies across both funds, then assess whether an industry downturn would affect both allocations together.

Continue the comparison

AIPI vs QQQI Β· CHPY vs SMH

Strategy sources checked September 27, 2026: CHPY issuer material Β· QQQI issuer material.

Current metrics use the dated snapshot above. Distributions can vary and may include return of capital; a distribution rate is not an expected total return.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Does adding CHPY to QQQI diversify my income portfolio?

It can increase semiconductor exposure rather than diversify it. Check the combined weights of chip companies already held by QQQI before adding CHPY. Compare reinvested returns over matching dates alongside cash paid and NAV changes; the larger distribution is not necessarily the larger investment gain.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.