DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

CLIP vs SGOV: Two Treasury Bill ETFs Compared

CLIP and SGOV do the same job: hold U.S. Treasury bills with one to three months to maturity and pay the interest out monthly. Global X runs CLIP against a Solactive 1-3 month bill index; iShares runs SGOV against an ICE 0-3 month bill index. With near-identical holdings, the decision comes down to expense ratio, trading spread, fund size and which brokerage perks apply.

Updated October 12, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

CLIP has outpaced SGOV over the trailing twelve months, posting a 3.76% total return against 3.72%. The lead holds up over 3 years too: CLIP has compounded at 4.53% a year, against 4.51% for SGOV. SGOV has been the steadier holding, though β€” annualized volatility of 0.2% against 0.4% for CLIP. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualizedSince Jun 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
CLIP2.86%3.76%4.53%4.59%0.4%-0.09-0.13-0.1%
SGOV2.85%3.72%4.51%4.61%0.2%-0.25-0.40-0.0%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Jun 2023” measures every fund from June 21, 2023 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricCLIPSGOV
Forward distribution rate3.76%3.59%
Trailing 12-month yield3.73%3.65%
30-day SEC yield3.70%β€”

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Short T-bill ETFs, from our catalog

SGOV tracks ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index and pays monthly at a forward distribution rate of 3.59% with an expense ratio of 0.09%.

BIL, another short Treasury ETF in this catalog, tracks Bloomberg 1-3 Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index at a forward distribution rate of 3.45% (Monthly) with an expense ratio of 0.1353%.

These are interest-like cash rates, not equity dividends. A covered-call or dividend ETF can pay more, and it can also lose principal.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricCLIPSGOV
Full nameGlobal X 1-3 Month T-Bill ETFiShares 0-3 Month Treasury Bond ETF
IssuerGlobal XiShares
Last Close$100.17 as of October 12, 2026$100.52 as of October 12, 2026
Distribution rate3.76%3.59%
Trailing 12-month yield3.73%3.65%
30-day SEC yield3.70%β€”
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ 7779
Safety-Adjusted Yield 2.90%2.84%
Expense ratio0.07%0.09%
AUM$2.36B$115B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexβ€”ICE 0-3 Month US Treasury Securities Index (USD)
Objectiveβ€”Seeks to track an index of U.S. Treasury obligations maturing in three months or less, investing at least 90% of assets in U.S. Treasury securities.
Asset classFixed IncomeFixed Income
Inception date06/20/202305/26/2020
Beta-0.0018-0.0029
Last dividend$0.314$0.301
Ex-dividend date10/01/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineCLIP and SGOV are nearly interchangeable β€” both offer very similar ultra short bond exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: CLIP is cheaper at 0.07% vs 0.09%.

CLIP vs SGOV: Two Treasury Bill ETFs Compared

CLIP and SGOV do the same job: hold U.S. Treasury bills with one to three months to maturity and pay the interest out monthly. Global X runs CLIP against a Solactive 1-3 month bill index; iShares runs SGOV against an ICE 0-3 month bill index. With near-identical holdings, the decision comes down to expense ratio, trading spread, fund size and which brokerage perks apply.

CLIPSGOV
Approach1-3 month Treasury bill ETF (Global X)0-3 month Treasury bill ETF (iShares)
Risk reviewSmall market-price moves, bid-ask spread, reinvestment ratesSmall market-price moves, bid-ask spread, reinvestment rates
Expense ratio0.07%0.09%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs118
Total AUM$93.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Global X is known for offering a diverse lineup of thematic and income-focused ETFs that cater to both traditional and alternative investment strategies. Their fund families span income generation through covered call strategies and SuperDividend funds, alongside thematic exposure in areas like digital assets, robotics, and emerging markets, complemented by bond and commodities offerings. The issuer provides broad coverage across sector-specific, risk-managed, and growth-oriented strategies, making their lineup particularly notable for investors seeking specialized exposure beyond conventional equity and fixed-income categories.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CLIP.

ETFs467
Total AUM$4.68T

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares, operated by BlackRock, is one of the largest and most established ETF providers globally, known for offering broad, liquid index-tracking funds across nearly all asset classes and investment styles. The lineup encompasses a comprehensive range of strategies including core equity and bond exposure, dividend and income-focused funds, covered call strategies, ESG and thematic investments, factor-based approaches, alternatives, commodities, and municipal bonds, serving both individual and institutional investors. With numerous popular ticker symbols and extensive diversification across geographies, sectors, and investment objectives, iShares provides one of the market's widest selections of ETFs for building diversified portfolios.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SGOV.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

CLIP and SGOV do the same job: hold U.S. Treasury bills with one to three months to maturity and pay the interest out monthly. Global X runs CLIP against a Solactive 1-3 month bill index; iShares runs SGOV against an ICE 0-3 month bill index. With near-identical holdings, the decision comes down to expense ratio, trading spread, fund size and which brokerage perks apply.

Very little in what they hold. Both own short Treasury bills and both pay monthly, so their yields track the same bill rates. The differences are practical: compare the current expense ratios, the typical bid-ask spread in the size you trade, assets under management and average volume. A smaller fund can have a slightly wider spread, which matters more for frequent trading than for cash you park for months. Neither difference changes the underlying credit exposure.

Deep dive

Reading two near-identical bill ETFs

When holdings match, a yield gap between two funds on the same date is usually the index's maturity window, the timing of each fund's bill rollover and the expense ratio. Over a full month those differences are small. Judge the pair on costs you can see and on the account you will hold it in, not on which showed the higher number on one day.

Continue the comparison

SGOV vs TBIL Β· SGOV vs VBIL Β· BIL vs SGOV

Strategy sources checked October 13, 2026: CLIP issuer material Β· SGOV issuer material.

Current metrics use the dated snapshot above. Distributions can vary and may include return of capital; a distribution rate is not an expected total return.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is there any real difference between CLIP and SGOV?

Very little in what they hold. Both own short Treasury bills and both pay monthly, so their yields track the same bill rates. The differences are practical: compare the current expense ratios, the typical bid-ask spread in the size you trade, assets under management and average volume. A smaller fund can have a slightly wider spread, which matters more for frequent trading than for cash you park for months. Neither difference changes the underlying credit exposure.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Expense ratio is the headline cost and is already inside each fund's 30-day SEC yield. The second cost is the spread you pay each time you trade, which depends on volume and order size; check live quotes for both. A distribution rate on this page annualizes one payout and will not separate two funds this similar.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.