DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

CRSH vs TSLA: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF and Tesla, Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on CRSH.

Side-by-side snapshot

CRSHTSLA
Full nameYieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETFTesla, Inc.
IssuerYieldMax
Last Close$20.42 as of July 8, 2026$402.90 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield52.81%
Distribution Safety Score 45
Expense ratio1.05%
AUM$16.4M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyNone
Underlying indexTesla (TSLA)
ObjectiveCovered CallDesigns, develops, manufactures, and sells electric vehicles, energy generation and storage systems, and related services. Operates automotive, energy generation and storage, and services segments.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/26/2024N/A
Beta-1.49851.802
Last dividend$0.2074
Ex-dividend date07/09/2026

Bottom lineChoose CRSH if you want to maximize current income — roughly 52.81%, generated by selling options premium. Choose TSLA if you want broad equity exposure. There's no free lunch: CRSH's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while TSLA keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

CRSH has lagged TSLA over the trailing twelve months, posting a -27.47% total return against 37.07%. Measured from May 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — TSLA has compounded at 44.73% a year versus -32.94% for CRSH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince May 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
CRSH-1.37%-27.47%-32.94%36.3%-1.01-1.34-33.4%
TSLA-8.03%37.07%44.73%44.8%0.610.87-29.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2024” measures every fund from May 2, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF, while TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) is a stock — they take fundamentally different approaches.

CRSH currently shows a 52.81% distribution yield. TSLA has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, CRSH would generate roughly $440.08/month, while TSLA has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

CRSH yield52.81%
TSLA yield

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, CRSH would cost approximately $1,050 in fees vs $0 for TSLA (simplified, not compounded). The $1,050.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

CRSH ER1.05%
TSLA ER

Strategy & risk

CRSH tracks Tesla (TSLA) with a covered call approach, while TSLA is a stock. Beta is -1.4985 for CRSH and 1.802 for TSLA, indicating CRSH is less volatile relative to the market.

CRSH beta-1.4985
TSLA beta1.802

Fund details

CRSH is managed by YieldMax (launched 06/26/2024) with $16.4M in assets. TSLA is managed by — (launched 06/29/2010) with — in assets.

CRSH AUM$16.4M
TSLA AUM

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of CRSH or TSLA pays more dividend income?

CRSH currently reports a distribution yield, while TSLA has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between CRSH and TSLA?

CRSH (YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Tesla (TSLA) with a covered call approach, while TSLA (Tesla, Inc.) is a stock. They are issued by YieldMax and — respectively.

Can I hold both CRSH and TSLA?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, CRSH or TSLA?

CRSH has an expense ratio of 1.05% while TSLA charges —. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in CRSH vs TSLA generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in CRSH would generate roughly $440.08 per month ($5,281.00 annually). TSLA has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, CRSH or TSLA?

CRSH has lagged TSLA over the trailing twelve months, posting a -27.47% total return against 37.07%. Measured from May 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — TSLA has compounded at 44.73% a year versus -32.94% for CRSH. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

CRSH vs TSLA — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

CRSH is a covered-call ETF that shorts Tesla call options against TSLA shares, distributing the premium collected as weekly income. TSLA is the stock itself, offering no dividend but direct equity exposure to Tesla's business. The fundamental difference: CRSH trades Tesla's growth potential for mechanically high weekly payouts funded by capping upside and selling volatility, while TSLA is a pure equity bet on the company's earnings and reinvested capital.

How they differ

CRSH's 67.41% annualized distribution rate is a structural feature of options overlay strategies—it collects premium weekly by selling call spreads, not from Tesla earnings. TSLA pays no dividend and offers uncapped upside exposure; its beta of 1.802 reflects its volatility relative to the broader market. The single biggest distinction is that CRSH's income comes from option premium and potential return-of-capital as NAV erodes, while TSLA's returns depend entirely on price appreciation and operational performance. CRSH is also subject to negative beta (–1.4985), meaning it tends to move opposite to the broader market and to TSLA itself—a structural hedge but also a signal that its premium-collection mechanism works best when TSLA declines or trades sideways. The expense ratio gap (1.05% on CRSH vs. zero on TSLA stock) is material for a fund with $16.4M in assets and weekly turnover from options management.

Who each is best for

CRSH: Fits investors who prioritize current weekly income over capital appreciation, accept that upside above short call strikes will be forfeited each week, and are comfortable with NAV erosion as a cost of high distribution rates. Also suited to those seeking a hedge against broad-market declines, given its negative correlation to equities.

TSLA: Fits investors who believe Tesla's long-term earnings and cash flow will compound faster than option premium can be collected, prefer to own shares with no distribution friction, and want full upside participation if the stock rallies sharply.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. CRSH's 67.41% distribution rate substantially exceeds typical equity earnings yields; sustaining this payout over years will likely require returning capital beyond gains, eroding the fund's net asset value. Investors should expect CRSH's share price to decline in real terms as distributions are paid.
  • Negative beta and correlation drag. CRSH's –1.4985 beta means it will lag TSLA during bull markets; if TSLA rallies 30%, CRSH may fall, even as its option premiums decay. Holding both simultaneously creates a drag on portfolio returns in rising markets.
  • Single-stock concentration and operational risk. Both holdings expose investors entirely to Tesla's product cycle, regulatory environment, and management execution. For CRSH, this is amplified because short calls cap recovery if Tesla's stock recovers from a decline, stranding gains.
  • Options leverage and cap risk. CRSH's payoffs are capped at the strike price of each weekly short call; if Tesla rallies unexpectedly, CRSH holders miss the move entirely, locking in an opportunity cost that compounds if the stock appreciates over months.
  • Liquidity and fund size. CRSH's $16.4M AUM is modest for an options-based ETF and may widen bid-ask spreads or make large redemptions costly; Tesla stock's massive liquidity dwarfs this risk.

Bottom line

If you want current income and are willing to forgo Tesla's full upside in exchange for weekly distributions, CRSH's mechanics provide a steady flow—at the cost of NAV erosion and a structural headwind during bull markets. If you believe Tesla will deliver substantial appreciation over your holding period and prefer to compound shares without dividend friction, TSLA offers unlimited upside and no expense drag. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.