DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DGRO vs SCHD: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 4, 2026

ETFs481
Total AUM$4451B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DGRO.

ETFs34
Total AUM$574B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Schwab is known for offering low-cost, broad-based ETFs that serve both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies. Their 33-fund lineup spans multiple asset classes including bonds, equities, international markets, digital assets, and factor-based strategies, with a notable emphasis on dividend-focused funds like SCHD alongside core index options. The issuer emphasizes accessibility for individual investors through competitive expense ratios and a diverse range of fund families designed to support various investment objectives.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SCHD.

Side-by-side snapshot

DGROSCHD
Full nameiShares Core Dividend Growth ETFSchwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
IssueriSharesSchwab
Last Close$77.26 as of July 4, 2026$32.39 as of July 4, 2026
Distribution yield1.71%3.12%
Distribution Safety Score97100
Expense ratio0.08%0.06%
AUM$40.6B$95.2B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexBasket (Growth-focused dividend equity holdings by BlackRock)Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index
ObjectiveSeeks to track the investment results of the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, which measures the performance of U.S. equities with a history of consistently growing dividends. Companies must have a payout ratio less than 75% and are excluded if in the top decile based on dividend yield.Seeks to track as closely as possible, before fees and expenses, the total return of the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which measures the performance of high dividend yielding stocks issued by U.S. companies with a record of consistently paying dividends, selected for fundamental strength relative to their peers based on financial ratios.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/10/201410/20/2011
Beta0.70.59
Last dividend$0.3310$0.2525
Ex-dividend date09/15/202606/24/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

DGRO has lagged SCHD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 21.82% total return against 23.16%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — DGRO has compounded at 13.57% a year, ahead of SCHD at 12.50%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Jun 2014Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DGRO11.69%21.82%17.05%11.29%13.57%12.51%11.8%0.961.40-14.0%
SCHD17.79%23.16%13.81%8.69%12.50%11.68%13.1%0.650.94-16.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2014” measures every fund from June 12, 2014 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SCHD offers the higher yield at 3.12% vs 1.71% for DGRO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SCHD is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.06% compared to 0.08%.

They track different benchmarks: DGRO is linked to Basket (Growth-focused dividend equity holdings by BlackRock) while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SCHD is the larger fund by assets ($95.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DGRO would generate roughly $14.25/month, while SCHD would produce $26.00/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

DGRO yield1.71%
SCHD yield3.12%
Monthly diff on $10K$11.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DGRO would cost approximately $80 in fees vs $60 for SCHD (simplified, not compounded). The $20.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DGRO ER0.08%
SCHD ER0.06%

Strategy & risk

DGRO tracks Basket (Growth-focused dividend equity holdings by BlackRock) with a basket approach, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index with a basket approach. Beta is 0.7 for DGRO and 0.59 for SCHD, indicating SCHD is less volatile relative to the market.

DGRO beta0.7
SCHD beta0.59

Fund details

DGRO is managed by iShares (launched 06/10/2014) with $40.6B in assets. SCHD is managed by Schwab (launched 10/20/2011) with $95.2B in assets.

DGRO AUM$40.6B
SCHD AUM$95.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is DGRO or SCHD better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SCHD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between DGRO and SCHD?

DGRO (iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF) tracks Basket (Growth-focused dividend equity holdings by BlackRock) with a basket approach, while SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index with a basket approach. They are issued by iShares and Schwab respectively.

Can I hold both DGRO and SCHD?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, DGRO or SCHD?

DGRO has an expense ratio of 0.08% while SCHD charges 0.06%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DGRO vs SCHD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DGRO would generate roughly $14.25 per month ($171.00 annually). The same in SCHD would produce about $26.00 per month ($312.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DGRO or SCHD?

DGRO has lagged SCHD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 21.82% total return against 23.16%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — DGRO has compounded at 13.57% a year, ahead of SCHD at 12.50%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DGRO vs SCHD — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

DGRO and SCHD are both broad-market U.S. dividend equity ETFs, but they target different points along the dividend spectrum. DGRO tracks the Morningstar U.S. Dividend Growth Index, prioritizing companies with growing dividends and low payout ratios (under 75%), which biases the portfolio toward quality and capital appreciation. SCHD targets the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index, emphasizing current yield and fundamental strength, which leans more heavily toward mature, high-yielding dividend payers. The core tradeoff: growth potential versus income generation.

How they differ

The biggest difference is yield philosophy. SCHD's 3.15% distribution rate is nearly double DGRO's 1.75%, reflecting a portfolio weighted toward the 100 highest-yielding dividend stocks in the U.S. versus DGRO's tilt toward companies with rising dividends and stricter payout discipline. DGRO's dividend-growth mandate means it excludes the top 10% of dividend-yield stocks by design, accepting lower current yield to capture future dividend raises and price appreciation.

Second, SCHD offers lower fees at 0.06% versus DGRO's 0.08%, though the difference is negligible at this scale. More materially, SCHD is substantially larger with $95.2B in assets versus DGRO's $40.6B, which may offer slightly better liquidity and tracking precision.

Third, DGRO carries a higher beta of 0.7 compared to SCHD's 0.59, suggesting more volatility and growth sensitivity, which aligns with its mandate to favor dividend-growth companies over the highest-yielding, often more defensive names.

Who each is best for

DGRO: Fits investors seeking meaningful dividend income that grows over time, paired with exposure to capital appreciation. Works for portfolios with a 10+ year horizon where compounding both dividend growth and price appreciation matters.

SCHD: Fits investors prioritizing current cash flow from their equity holdings, accepting lower growth-dividend exposure in exchange for higher immediate yield. Suits those building a reliable income stream from broad-market U.S. dividend equity.

Key risks to know

  • Dividend-growth derating risk (DGRO): By excluding high-yield stocks and capping payout ratios, DGRO sacrifices current income and may underperform in periods when high-dividend, mature stocks outpace growth-dividend stocks. Rising interest rates can especially penalize growth-oriented dividend stocks relative to yield-heavy alternatives.
  • Yield compression and high-dividend exhaustion risk (SCHD): SCHD's focus on the 100 highest-yielding stocks means it concentrates in sectors (utilities, REITs, financials) vulnerable to rate shocks and dividend cuts. Mean reversion in yields could compress current returns if high-dividend stocks face pressure.
  • Payout-ratio discipline divergence (DGRO): DGRO's strict sub-75% payout-ratio filter may screen out some legitimate dividend aristocrats with higher but sustainable payouts. This discipline is a feature, but in a sharply declining-rate environment, it may exclude outperforming high-dividend names.
  • Tracking index churn (both): Both track different indices, so holdings and sector weights diverge materially. Index reconstitution timing and the specific "consistently paying dividends" definitions differ between Morningstar and Dow Jones methodologies, creating tracking surprises.

Bottom line

DGRO prioritizes dividend growth and capital appreciation at the cost of lower current yield; SCHD swaps growth for higher immediate income. If you value compounding dividend raises and are comfortable with lower yields today, DGRO's lower yield aligns with that goal. If you need substantial current cash flow from equities and accept a slower-growth dividend profile, SCHD's 3.15% yield and larger asset base offer clearer income generation. Past performance doesn't guarantee future results, and both funds' returns depend on underlying index construction and market conditions.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.