DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DIPS vs NVDA: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF and NVIDIA Corporation covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

Bottom lineChoose DIPS if you want to maximize current income — roughly 43.29%, generated by selling options premium. Choose NVDA if you want broad equity exposure. There's no free lunch: DIPS's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while NVDA keeps full price exposure.

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DIPS.

Side-by-side snapshot

DIPSNVDA
Full nameYieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETFNVIDIA Corporation
IssuerYieldMax
Last Close$40.15 as of July 8, 2026$196.93 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield43.29%0.51%
Distribution Safety Score 4896
Expense ratio1.05%
AUM$8.21M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyQuarterly
Underlying indexNVIDIA (NVDA)
ObjectiveCovered CallDesigns and manufactures graphics processing units (GPUs) and system-on-chip units for gaming, professional visualization, data centers, and automotive markets. A leader in AI infrastructure and accelerated computing.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date07/23/2024N/A
Beta-1.34182.211
Last dividend$0.3343$0.2500
Ex-dividend date07/09/202606/04/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

DIPS has lagged NVDA over the trailing twelve months, posting a -16.13% total return against 24.62%. Measured from Jul 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 32.28% a year versus -29.71% for DIPS. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jul 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DIPS-3.39%-16.13%-29.71%28.5%-0.78-1.03-27.7%
NVDA4.41%24.62%32.28%35.2%0.500.72-20.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jul 2024” measures every fund from July 24, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock — they take fundamentally different approaches.

DIPS offers the higher yield at 43.29% vs 0.51% for NVDA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DIPS would generate roughly $360.75/month, while NVDA would produce $4.25/month, at current distribution rates.

DIPS yield43.29%
NVDA yield0.51%
Monthly diff on $10K$356.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DIPS would cost approximately $1,050 in fees vs $0 for NVDA (simplified, not compounded). The $1,050.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DIPS ER1.05%
NVDA ER

Strategy & risk

DIPS tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach, while NVDA is a stock. Beta is -1.3418 for DIPS and 2.211 for NVDA, indicating DIPS is less volatile relative to the market.

DIPS beta-1.3418
NVDA beta2.211

Fund details

DIPS is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/23/2024) with $8.21M in assets. NVDA is managed by — (launched 01/22/1999) with — in assets.

DIPS AUM$8.21M
NVDA AUM

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is DIPS or NVDA better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. DIPS currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between DIPS and NVDA?

DIPS (YieldMax Short NVDA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks NVIDIA (NVDA) with a covered call approach, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. They are issued by YieldMax and — respectively.

Can I hold both DIPS and NVDA?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, DIPS or NVDA?

DIPS has an expense ratio of 1.05% while NVDA charges —. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DIPS vs NVDA generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DIPS would generate roughly $360.75 per month ($4,329.00 annually). The same in NVDA would produce about $4.25 per month ($51.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DIPS or NVDA?

DIPS has lagged NVDA over the trailing twelve months, posting a -16.13% total return against 24.62%. Measured from Jul 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — NVDA has compounded at 32.28% a year versus -29.71% for DIPS. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DIPS vs NVDA — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

DIPS is a covered call ETF that holds NVIDIA stock and sells weekly call options against it, targeting a 48.81% annual distribution yield. NVDA is the underlying stock itself—a semiconductor leader with a 0.51% dividend yield and no options overlay. The core difference is structural: DIPS swaps capital appreciation potential for high current income through systematic call selling, while NVDA offers direct ownership of the business with minimal distributions.

How they differ

DIPS and NVDA expose you to the same company, but through radically different mechanics. DIPS's 48.81% distribution rate comes from call option premiums collected weekly, not from underlying earnings; NVDA's 0.51% yield is a traditional quarterly dividend. This means DIPS generates income by capping your upside—each week it sells calls at predetermined strike prices, locking in gains and creating a negative beta of -1.34 (it moves opposite the broader market). NVDA has a positive beta of 2.211, meaning it amplifies market moves. DIPS carries a 1.05% annual fee and manages only $8.21M; NVDA has no fund fee and is a direct stock purchase. The weekly call cycle in DIPS also creates reinvestment friction and tax events that don't exist in NVDA.

Who each is best for

DIPS: Fits investors with a very short time horizon who want to extract current income from a conviction holding in NVIDIA and accept that meaningful price appreciation will be mechanically capped or surrendered to call holders.

NVDA: Fits long-term equity investors who believe in NVIDIA's AI and data-center competitive moat and want to participate in capital appreciation with minimal distributions and no options drag.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion from unsustainable yield: A 48.81% annualized distribution rate from an ETF that has held NVIDIA for under a year raises serious questions about whether this return of capital is eroding principal. If the weekly call premium collection fails to sustain, NAV will fall sharply.
  • Upside cap and call assignment: DIPS systematically sells calls to fund its payout. If NVIDIA rallies sharply, your shares will likely be called away at the strike price, forcing you to either take that cap or exit the position entirely. This is not a buy-and-hold vehicle.
  • Negative beta distortion: DIPS's beta of -1.34 is a red flag. A covered call strategy should not move opposite the stock it holds. This suggests the options positions dominate the underlying position's risk profile—a structural instability.
  • Liquidity and size risk: At $8.21M in AUM and only since July 2024, DIPS has minimal assets and a short track record. Widening bid-ask spreads and potential fund closure are realistic near-term risks if flows don't improve.
  • Reinvestment and timing: Weekly distributions force you to reinvest distributions frequently, introducing timing risk and potentially locking in purchases at inopportune price levels.

Bottom line

If you need consistent high current income from a NVIDIA holding and accept that the stock will be called away or capped, DIPS offers a mechanical solution. If you want to own NVIDIA for its long-term AI dominance and compound your gains, NVDA is the direct route. Past performance—especially DIPS's brief track record—does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.