DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

DIVO vs ROCY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF and JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 16, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • DIVOInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • ROCYInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

DIVO has lagged ROCY over the year to date, posting a 11.39% total return against 14.13%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulativeSince Mar 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DIVO11.39%10.09%9.3%1.332.08-4.2%
ROCY14.13%14.13%10.4%1.792.77-3.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 16, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Mar 2026” measures every fund from March 19, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Mar 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Mar 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDIVOROCY
Full nameAmplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETFJPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF
IssuerAmplify ETFsJPMorgan
Last Close$47.81 as of October 16, 2026$54.83 as of October 16, 2026
Distribution rate4.74%6.68%
Trailing 12-month yield6.31%3.87%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8750
Safety-Adjusted Yield 4.12%—
Expense ratio0.56%0.35%
AUM$7.90B$812M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexActively managed (no tracked index recorded)S&P 500
ObjectiveActively managed fund that seeks to provide current income as the primary objective and capital appreciation as the secondary objective by investing at least 80% of net assets in dividend-paying U.S. exchange-traded equity securities while opportunistically utilizing covered call options on those securities.Designed to deliver current yield while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation and total return.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date12/14/201603/19/2026
Beta0.540.7639
Last dividend$0.18904$0.305
Ex-dividend date09/29/202610/01/2026

Bottom lineDIVO and ROCY are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: ROCY charges 0.35% against 0.56% for DIVO, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold. DIVO and ROCY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs47
Total AUM$16.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DIVO.

ETFs78
Total AUM$353B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

JPMorgan is a major provider of ETFs spanning multiple asset classes and strategies, with particular strength in income-focused funds including their popular covered call strategy lineup. Their fund family encompasses broad categories including bond, equity, factor, income, index, international, municipal, and sector ETFs, providing investors with diverse exposure options across markets and investment styles. The issuer offers both core indexed strategies and actively managed solutions, serving investors seeking everything from traditional dividend income to sophisticated factor-based and thematic approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ROCY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) and ROCY (JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

ROCY's latest distribution annualizes to 6.68%, but it has paid 3.87% over the trailing 12 months (it has not paid for a full year yet). With ROCY's two yield figures this far apart, neither settles which fund pays more. Compare the distribution rate and trailing 12-month yield rows in the snapshot below.

ROCY is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.56%.

DIVO is the larger fund by assets ($7.90B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose DIVO

Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.5 vs 0.8 for ROCY.

Choose ROCY

JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.35% expense ratio vs 0.56% for DIVO.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DIVO would generate roughly $39.50 cash per distribution, while ROCY would produce $55.67 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

DIVO yield4.74%
ROCY yield6.68%
Cash diff on $10K$16.17

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DIVO would cost approximately $560 in fees vs $350 for ROCY (simplified, not compounded). The $210.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DIVO ER0.56%
ROCY ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

DIVO is an actively managed ETF built around a derivative overlay strategy, while ROCY combines actively managed equities with laddered call spreads. Beta is 0.54 for DIVO and 0.7639 for ROCY, making DIVO the less volatile of the two by this measure.

DIVO beta0.54
ROCY beta0.7639

Fund details

DIVO is managed by Amplify ETFs (launched 12/14/2016) with $7.90B in assets. ROCY is managed by JPMorgan (launched 03/19/2026) with $812M in assets.

DIVO AUM$7.90B
ROCY AUM$812M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for DIVO and ROCY?

DIVO currently distributes 4.74% and ROCY 6.68%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is DIVO or ROCY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. ROCY's latest distribution annualizes to 6.68%, but it has paid 3.87% over the trailing 12 months (it has not paid for a full year yet). With ROCY's two yield figures this far apart, neither settles which fund pays more. Compare the distribution rate and trailing 12-month yield rows in the snapshot below. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between DIVO and ROCY?

DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) is an actively managed ETF built around a derivative overlay strategy, while ROCY (JPMorgan Equity Premium Yield ETF) combines actively managed equities with laddered call spreads. They are issued by Amplify ETFs and JPMorgan respectively.

Can I hold both DIVO and ROCY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is DIVO or ROCY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — DIVO scores 87, ROCY scores 50, so DIVO's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. DIVO has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.54 vs 0.76 for ROCY). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, DIVO or ROCY?

DIVO has an expense ratio of 0.56% while ROCY charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DIVO vs ROCY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in DIVO would generate roughly $39.50 cash per distribution ($474.00 annually). The same in ROCY would produce about $55.67 cash per distribution ($668.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DIVO or ROCY?

DIVO has lagged ROCY over the year to date, posting a 11.39% total return against 14.13%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DIVO vs ROCY — at a glance

Generated October 17, 2026.

Overview

DIVO and ROCY are both actively managed equity ETFs that use covered call strategies to boost current income from U.S. stock holdings. DIVO invests in a diversified basket of dividend-paying equities and has operated since late 2016 with $7.90B in assets. ROCY, launched in March 2026, takes a more focused approach by writing calls against S&P 500 exposure, aiming to generate higher yield from a narrower index base with $812M in assets.

How they differ

The largest difference is their underlying equity strategy. DIVO selects dividend-paying stocks across the market; ROCY mechanically tracks the S&P 500. This shapes their call-writing opportunity set: DIVO's managers pick which stocks to cover, while ROCY covers a fixed index, potentially capping upside more uniformly.

Yield reflects the strategy difference. DIVO distributes 4.74%, while ROCY distributes 6.68% — a gap of 1.94% percentage points. ROCY's higher payout likely stems from more aggressive call pricing or the S&P 500's larger cap base, which can support richer option premiums.

Fees and size diverge significantly. DIVO's expense ratio is 0.56%, compared to ROCY's 0.35%, a difference of 0.21% basis points. DIVO's larger asset base of $7.90B versus ROCY's $812M reflects DIVO's longer track record; ROCY is a brand-new fund. Beta is also notably different: DIVO trades at 0.54, while ROCY is 0.7639, suggesting DIVO's covered call overlay dampens market moves more than ROCY's approach does.

Who each is best for

DIVO: Fits investors who want monthly income from a manager-selected portfolio of dividend stocks, value the track record of a fund that has operated through multiple market cycles, and are comfortable with moderate call-writing overhead (0.56% expense ratio) in exchange for active stock selection and lower beta sensitivity.

ROCY: Fits investors seeking to harvest S&P 500 exposure via options premium, prefer lower fees (0.35% expense ratio), and either tolerate or prefer the mechanical discipline of index-based covered calls over active stock picking, despite the fund's recent launch and smaller asset base.

Key risks to know

  • Call capping on rallies. Both funds limit upside by selling calls against their holdings. In a strong market, ROCY's S&P 500 basket may experience faster call assignment than DIVO's actively managed portfolio, potentially locking in gains while the underlying climbs. DIVO's active selection may offer more granular timing, though this is not guaranteed.
  • NAV erosion risk from elevated yields. ROCY's 6.68% yield is material relative to typical equity total returns. If the fund's underlying holdings appreciate slowly or decline, distributions that exceed gains will gradually erode net asset value; this risk rises the longer such a yield persists unmatched by capital appreciation or call premium renewal.
  • Beta and drawdown asymmetry. DIVO's lower beta (0.54) may not fully protect in market crashes if call protection proves less effective during volatility spikes. Conversely, ROCY's higher beta (0.7639) exposes it to larger downswings if the S&P 500 declines sharply, though call premiums may cushion the fall modestly. The fund's ability to sustain its stated yield strategy and attract inflows remains unproven; a sharp outflow could force the fund to raise cash, disrupting call execution and increasing drag.
  • Overlap in call-writing exposure. Both funds rely on options premiums, which compress during low-volatility regimes. If implied volatility falls sharply, call prices decline, reducing the income boost both funds generate regardless of their underlying equity choice.

Bottom line

If you want proven call-overlay income from a manager-selected dividend portfolio and lower volatility, DIVO offers both track record and a tighter expense ratio relative to its fee. If you prefer simpler S&P 500 exposure with a lower fee and higher current yield, ROCY delivers that — though its newness means performance and sustainability across a full market cycle remain unproven. Neither fund is guaranteed to sustain its stated yield if equity returns disappoint or call premiums compress; review performance and NAV trends periodically to ensure the strategy remains aligned with your income goals.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.