DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

SMH vs DRAM: The Whole Semi Chain, or Memory Chips?

A head-to-head of VanEck's Semiconductor ETF and Roundhill's Memory ETF covering who is in each book, cost, and concentration.

Data updated September 18, 2026

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings.

DRAM has outpaced SMH over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 114.73% total return against 46.05%. SMH has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 46.7% against 91.3% for DRAM. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Apr 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
DRAM114.73%91.3%1.772.64-44.4%
SMH46.05%46.7%1.672.39-24.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 18, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Apr 2026” measures every fund from April 2, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Apr 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Apr 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricDRAMSMH
Full nameRoundhill Memory ETFVanEck Semiconductor ETF
IssuerRoundhill InvestmentsVanEck
Last Close$59.61 as of September 18, 2026$573.00 as of September 18, 2026
Distribution rate0.19%
Distribution Safety Score™ 93
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.18%
Expense ratio0.65%0.35%
AUM$25.9B$66.8B
Distribution frequencyNoneAnnual
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
ObjectiveSeeks capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in the equity securities of memory companies, or in swaps and forward contracts that provide equivalent exposure.Track the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/02/202612/20/2011
Beta2.06
Last dividend$1.105
Ex-dividend date12/22/2025

— Distribution rate, Safety-Adjusted Yield, last dividend, and ex-dividend date are not yet available because DRAM launched April 2026; these fields will populate after the first distribution.

Bottom lineWe won't call this one: DRAM launched April 2026, so there is not yet a track record to compare. Compare the strategy, cost and holdings in the sections above and treat any performance figures for the newer ETF as provisional. What is already clear from the numbers above: the two do not cost the same — SMH charges 0.35% against 0.65% for DRAM, and on funds tracking the same thing that gap compounds every year you hold.

DRAM vs SMH: memory chips or the whole semi chain?

DRAM concentrates in memory. SMH is listed semiconductor companies. Breadth versus a memory bet is the decision.

DRAMSMH
What it ownsMemory-chip companiesMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
Expense ratio0.65%0.35%
Fund size$25.9B$66.8B

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs56
Total AUM$37.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on DRAM.

ETFs85
Total AUM$163B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SMH currently shows a 0.19% distribution yield. DRAM has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

SMH is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.65%.

SMH has $66.8B in assets vs $25.9B for DRAM, but DRAM only launched April 2026 — AUM comparisons will become more meaningful as it builds a track record.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, DRAM has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while SMH would produce $1.58/month, at current distribution rates.

DRAM yield
SMH yield0.19%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, DRAM would cost approximately $650 in fees vs $350 for SMH (simplified, not compounded). The $300.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

DRAM ER0.65%
SMH ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

DRAM is an ETF built around a thematic strategy, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach.

DRAM beta
SMH beta2.06

Fund details

DRAM is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 04/02/2026) with $25.9B in assets. SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $66.8B in assets.

DRAM AUM$25.9B
SMH AUM$66.8B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between SMH and DRAM?

SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) holds listed semiconductor companies. DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) concentrates in memory names. They can share chip stocks and still be different bets. Cost is 0.35% versus 0.65%; size is $66.8B versus $25.9B. Distributions are 0.19% and — as of September 2026. Breadth versus a memory sleeve is the decision.

Which of DRAM or SMH pays more dividend income?

SMH currently reports a distribution yield, while DRAM has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between DRAM and SMH?

DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) is an ETF built around a thematic strategy, while SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach. They are issued by Roundhill Investments and VanEck respectively.

Can I hold both DRAM and SMH?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, DRAM or SMH?

DRAM has an expense ratio of 0.65% while SMH charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in DRAM vs SMH generate?

At current rates, DRAM has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in SMH would produce about $1.58 per month ($19.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, DRAM or SMH?

DRAM has outpaced SMH over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 114.73% total return against 46.05%. SMH has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 46.7% against 91.3% for DRAM. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

DRAM vs SMH — at a glance

Generated September 20, 2026.

Overview

DRAM and SMH are both semiconductor-focused equity ETFs, but they target materially different slices of the chip industry. DRAM tracks memory-chip companies—a narrower, thematically concentrated play on DRAM and NAND flash manufacturers. SMH follows a broader index of 25 publicly listed U.S. semiconductor firms, capturing logic chips, fabless design, and equipment makers alongside memory players. The key distinction is scope: DRAM is a concentrated single-subsector bet, while SMH is a diversified semiconductor index.

How they differ

The largest difference is breadth. DRAM requires at least 80% exposure to memory-company equities or derivatives replicating that exposure, making it a focused play on a single semiconductor segment. SMH tracks a 25-company index across the entire semiconductor ecosystem—design, manufacturing, equipment, and memory—meaning memory exposure is one component among many. This structural difference makes DRAM far more concentrated by design.

Second, DRAM is much newer. It launched 04/02/2026, while SMH has operated since 12/20/2011, giving SMH over a decade of track record and operational maturity. DRAM's $25.9B in assets under management is substantial but less than one-third of SMH's $66.8B, though both are well-capitalized for a thematic ETF and a flagship index fund respectively.

Third, fees and income differ. DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio is higher than SMH's 0.35%, and DRAM does not report a distribution rate and pays no dividends, so it's a pure capital-appreciation vehicle.

Who each is best for

DRAM: Fits investors who believe memory chips (DRAM and NAND) will drive semiconductor outperformance and who have high conviction in this narrow subsector. Designed for growth-oriented allocations with a long time horizon, since the fund carries significant concentration risk and no dividend income to cushion drawdowns.

SMH: Designed for investors seeking broad exposure to semiconductor manufacturing, design, and supply-chain companies without betting on a single chip type. Fits portfolios that view semiconductors as a structural growth theme but want diversification across the supply chain, plus modest annual dividend income.

Key risks to know

  • Concentration in memory subsector (DRAM-specific). DRAM holds at least 80% of assets in memory-company equities or swaps. A downturn specific to DRAM pricing, oversupply, or memory-chip demand could hit the fund sharply with no offsetting exposure to logic, design, or equipment. Memory chip cycles are pronounced and historically volatile.
  • Commodity-like memory pricing. DRAM and NAND flash prices are supply-driven, highly cyclical, and subject to sudden swings. A memory glut or shift in enterprise datacenter demand can compress margins and valuations rapidly, affecting DRAM's holdings across the board simultaneously.
  • Derivative and swap exposure (DRAM-specific). DRAM can use swaps and forward contracts to replicate memory-company exposure. These instruments carry counterparty risk, roll costs, and basis risk; the fund's ability to track its target may diverge from a pure equity approach, especially in stressed markets.
  • Semiconductor sector volatility. Semiconductor equities are sensitive to economic cycles, supply disruptions, and technology transitions. Stocks in the sector tend to amplify both rallies and selloffs, creating pronounced price swings during business cycle shifts or chip availability crises.
  • Overlapping holdings across memory and broader semis. Both funds hold memory-chip equities (Samsung, SK Hynix, Micron are common), so their returns may correlate strongly in some environments and diverge in others depending on whether memory or logic/equipment outperforms. Holdings-level overlap should be verified before combining them in a single allocation.

Bottom line

If you want pure, concentrated memory-chip exposure and can tolerate subsector-specific cyclicality and no dividend income, DRAM offers a direct thematic play. If you prefer diversification across the entire semiconductor value chain with a longer operating history, tighter fees, and modest annual income, SMH's index approach casts a wider net. DRAM's newness and memory-only mandate make it a specialized allocation for high-conviction investors; SMH's maturity and breadth suit broader semiconductor exposure. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.