DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

FTXL vs SMH: Same Industry, Different Semi Indexes

A head-to-head of First Trust's Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF and VanEck's Semiconductor ETF covering index rules, cost, and overlap.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Best for

  • FTXLInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • SMHInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

FTXL has outpaced SMH over the trailing twelve months, posting a 135.21% total return against 98.57%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SMH has compounded at 34.01% a year, ahead of FTXL at 28.34%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Sep 2016Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
FTXL67.59%135.21%47.11%27.44%28.34%28.34%40.2%0.851.21-41.6%
SMH51.89%98.57%54.30%33.71%34.01%34.03%36.9%1.061.50-35.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since Sep 2016” measures every fund from September 21, 2016 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricFTXLSMH
Full nameFirst Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETFVanEck Semiconductor ETF
IssuerFirst TrustVanEck
Last Close$227.85 as of September 4, 2026$567.01 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution rate0.06%0.19%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5793
Safety-Adjusted Yield 0.03%0.18%
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
AUM$1.19B$66.4B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyAnnual
Underlying indexMVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index
ObjectiveTrack the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/20/201612/20/2011
Beta2.412.05
Last dividend$0.036$1.105
Ex-dividend date06/25/202612/22/2025

Bottom lineFTXL and SMH are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: SMH charges 0.35% against 0.60% for FTXL, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

FTXL vs SMH: two semiconductor indexes

Same industry, different construction. Holdings overlap is high; index rules, concentration, and cost are the live differences.

FTXLSMH
IssuerFirst TrustVanEck
Expense ratio0.60%0.35%
Fund size$1.19B$66.4B
Distribution yield0.06%0.19%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs312
Total AUM$285B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

First Trust operates a broad multi-strategy ETF platform with 50 funds spanning allocation, income, alternatives, and thematic investing. The issuer focuses heavily on specialized income strategies, including dividend funds, covered call strategies (Buffer series), and sector-specific income plays, alongside factor-based and alternative investments. Notable tickers like FDN (tech), FAN (clean energy), and the Buffer series (BUFD, BUFQ, BUFR) reflect the issuer's emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies across diverse market segments.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on FTXL.

ETFs85
Total AUM$167B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SMH.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SMH offers the higher yield at 0.19% vs 0.06% for FTXL. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SMH is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.35% compared to 0.60%.

SMH is the larger fund by assets ($66.4B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, FTXL would generate roughly $0.50/month, while SMH would produce $1.58/month, at current distribution rates.

FTXL yield0.06%
SMH yield0.19%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.08

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, FTXL would cost approximately $600 in fees vs $350 for SMH (simplified, not compounded). The $250.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

FTXL ER0.60%
SMH ER0.35%

Strategy & risk

FTXL is an ETF built around technology exposure, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index with a technology approach. Beta is 2.41 for FTXL and 2.05 for SMH, making SMH the less volatile of the two by this measure.

FTXL beta2.41
SMH beta2.05

Fund details

FTXL is managed by First Trust (launched 09/20/2016) with $1.19B in assets. SMH is managed by VanEck (launched 12/20/2011) with $66.4B in assets.

FTXL AUM$1.19B
SMH AUM$66.4B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between FTXL and SMH?

Both are semiconductor equity funds, but the indexes differ. FTXL (First Trust Nasdaq Semiconductor ETF) is First Trust's Nasdaq semiconductor sleeve. SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Cost is 0.60% versus 0.35%; size is $1.19B versus $66.4B. Distributions are 0.06% and 0.19% as of September 2026. Compare holdings overlap, not a near-zero yield gap.

What is the current distribution rate for FTXL and SMH?

FTXL currently distributes 0.06% and SMH 0.19%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is FTXL or SMH better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SMH currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both FTXL and SMH?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is FTXL or SMH safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SMH scores 93, FTXL scores 57, so SMH's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SMH has also shown lower price volatility (beta 2.05 vs 2.41 for FTXL). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, FTXL or SMH?

FTXL has an expense ratio of 0.60% while SMH charges 0.35%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in FTXL vs SMH generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in FTXL would generate roughly $0.50 per month ($6.00 annually). The same in SMH would produce about $1.58 per month ($19.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, FTXL or SMH?

FTXL has outpaced SMH over the trailing twelve months, posting a 135.21% total return against 98.57%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — SMH has compounded at 34.01% a year, ahead of FTXL at 28.34%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare FTXL with

People also compare SMH with

Popular comparisons

FTXL vs SMH — at a glance

Generated September 5, 2026.

Overview

FTXL and SMH are both equity ETFs focused on semiconductor exposure, but they differ meaningfully in scope and construction. FTXL tracks semiconductor holdings within a broader Nasdaq framework with less explicit semiconductor concentration, while SMH tracks the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index, a focused index of 25 U.S.-listed semiconductor companies. The result: SMH is a narrower, more sector-pure play; FTXL casts a wider net through a technology-oriented parent strategy.

How they differ

The biggest difference is index composition and breadth. SMH holds exactly 25 semiconductor companies via the MVIS index; FTXL's semiconductor exposure comes as part of a larger Nasdaq technology mandate, likely giving it a broader holdings list and exposure to related tech names outside pure semiconductors. SMH's 0.35% expense ratio undercuts FTXL's 0.60%, a meaningful gap at scale, and SMH has vastly larger assets—$66.4B versus $1.19B—which typically translates to tighter bid-ask spreads and better liquidity. Beta-wise, SMH's 2.05 is notably lower than FTXL's 2.41, suggesting FTXL carries more volatility relative to the broad market.

Who each is best for

FTXL: Investors who want exposure to semiconductor strength but within a broader technology ecosystem, accepting higher volatility and slightly higher fees for less concentrated sector risk.

SMH: Investors seeking pure-play semiconductor sector exposure with lower fees and a tighter 25-company index structure, or those who value the larger asset base and liquidity that comes with higher AUM.

Key risks to know

  • Semiconductor cycle and valuation risk. Both funds are highly sensitive to chip demand cycles, supply-chain disruptions, and competitive pricing pressure. A slowdown in PC, smartphone, or data-center demand can pressure valuations sharply across the entire sector.
  • Higher beta volatility. FTXL's 2.41 beta means it swings harder than the broad market in both directions; SMH's 2.05 is also well above 1, so both amplify downturns. Neither fund dampens market shocks.
  • Concentration and overlap. SMH's index approach locks in exposure to its top 25 holdings with transparent weighting; FTXL's technology mandate may create hidden overlap with those same large-cap names. Verify current holdings to assess true diversification between the two.
  • Liquidity and spread risk in FTXL. With $1.19B in assets, FTXL trades a fraction of SMH's volume. During market stress or sector rotation, wider spreads and execution risk are more likely.

Bottom line

If you want the cleanest, most liquid semiconductor index exposure with the lowest fees, SMH's focus and $66.4B asset base stand out. If you prefer blended tech-sector exposure with some non-semiconductor holdings and accept higher volatility and fees for that breadth, FTXL fits the profile. Either way, both move sharply with chip-sector sentiment—past performance doesn't guarantee future results, and semiconductor valuations are cyclical.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.