DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

GDX vs GLD: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VanEck Gold Miners ETF and SPDR Gold Shares covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • GDXInvestors who want higher current income (0.70% while GLD makes no distribution).
  • GLDInvestors who want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricGDXGLD
Full nameVanEck Gold Miners ETFSPDR Gold Shares
IssuerVanEckState Street
Last Close$90.96 as of August 13, 2026$404.92 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield0.70%0.00%
Distribution Safety Score™ 96
Expense ratio0.51%0.40%
AUM$23.7B$132B
Distribution frequencyAnnualNone
Underlying indexNYSE Arca Gold Miners IndexGold bullion spot price
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Reflect the performance of the price of gold bullion less trust expenses.
Asset classCommodityCommodity
Inception date05/16/200611/18/2004
Beta0.820.36
Last dividend$0.6330
Ex-dividend date12/22/2025

Bottom lineChoose GDX if you want higher current income (0.70% while GLD makes no distribution). Choose GLD if you want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and market stress.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs84
Total AUM$161B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VanEck is known for offering specialized and thematic ETFs across diverse asset classes, including commodities, digital assets, and sector-specific investments. The firm's 22-fund lineup spans income-generating options, covered call strategies, and growth-focused equity funds, with popular tickers including GDX (gold miners), SMH (semiconductors), MOAT (competitive advantage stocks), and HODL (bitcoin). VanEck distinguishes itself through niche exposure areas such as digital assets, commodities, and thematic investing strategies, complemented by traditional bond and municipal bond offerings.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GDX.

ETFs180
Total AUM$2127B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GLD.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

GDX has outpaced GLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 58.82% total return against 31.23%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: GDX has compounded at 12.44% a year, against 12.23% for GLD. GLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 21.0% against 39.3% for GDX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince May 2006Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
GDX6.10%58.82%48.29%24.44%12.44%5.37%39.3%0.891.25-38.9%
GLD1.67%31.23%31.81%19.80%12.23%9.44%21.0%1.111.53-26.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2006” measures every fund from May 22, 2006 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) and GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) are both ETFs, but they take different approaches.

GDX currently shows a 0.70% distribution yield. GLD has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

GLD is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.40% compared to 0.51%.

They track different benchmarks: GDX is linked to NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index while GLD tracks Gold bullion spot price, which means their performance drivers differ.

GLD is the larger fund by assets ($132B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose GDX

VanEck Gold Miners ETF

  • Want higher current income — GDX yields 0.70% while GLD makes no distribution.
  • Want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and equity stress.

Choose GLD

SPDR Gold Shares

  • Want a non-correlated hedge against inflation and equity stress.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.40% expense ratio vs 0.51% for GDX.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.4 vs 0.8 for GDX.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, GDX would generate roughly $5.83/month, while GLD has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

GDX yield0.70%
GLD yield0.00%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, GDX would cost approximately $510 in fees vs $400 for GLD (simplified, not compounded). The $110.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

GDX ER0.51%
GLD ER0.40%

Strategy & risk

GDX tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index with a metals approach, while GLD tracks Gold bullion spot price with a metals approach. Beta is 0.82 for GDX and 0.36 for GLD, indicating GLD is less volatile relative to the market.

GDX beta0.82
GLD beta0.36

Fund details

GDX is managed by VanEck (launched 05/16/2006) with $23.7B in assets. GLD is managed by State Street (launched 11/18/2004) with $132B in assets.

GDX AUM$23.7B
GLD AUM$132B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of GDX or GLD pays more dividend income?

GDX currently reports a distribution yield, while GLD has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between GDX and GLD?

GDX (VanEck Gold Miners ETF) tracks NYSE Arca Gold Miners Index with a metals approach, while GLD (SPDR Gold Shares) tracks Gold bullion spot price with a metals approach. They are issued by VanEck and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both GDX and GLD?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, GDX or GLD?

GDX has an expense ratio of 0.51% while GLD charges 0.40%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in GDX vs GLD generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in GDX would generate roughly $5.83 per month ($70.00 annually). GLD has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, GDX or GLD?

GDX has outpaced GLD over the trailing twelve months, posting a 58.82% total return against 31.23%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: GDX has compounded at 12.44% a year, against 12.23% for GLD. GLD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 21.0% against 39.3% for GDX. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

GDX vs GLD — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

GDX and GLD both provide gold exposure through ETFs, but they target fundamentally different investors. GLD tracks the spot price of physical gold bullion directly, while GDX tracks an index of publicly traded gold mining companies. The choice between them hinges on whether you want commodity-price exposure or equity exposure to the gold industry.

How they differ

GLD mirrors the price of gold itself—it holds physical bullion and aims to track spot prices minus trust expenses. GDX, by contrast, owns shares in gold miners, so its returns depend on both gold prices and the profitability and operational execution of mining firms. This is the core difference: GLD moves with the commodity; GDX moves with equities that benefit when gold prices rise but suffer when mining costs spike or mine output disappoints.

GLD has a 0.40% expense ratio and $132B in AUM, making it the largest and cheapest option for pure gold-price exposure. GDX costs 0.51% annually and holds $23.7B in assets. GLD pays no distributions, while GDX distributes 0.70% annually—a modest yield from dividends paid by its underlying mining stocks. GDX has higher beta (0.81 versus GLD's 0.41), meaning it amplifies gold-price moves and carries equity-market sensitivity that GLD does not.

Who each is best for

GLD: Fits investors seeking a liquid, tax-efficient way to track gold bullion prices without equity volatility, often as a portfolio hedge or tactical commodity position.

GDX: Fits investors comfortable with equity risk who want leverage to gold prices through mining-company earnings and believe operational improvements or consolidation in the sector will add value beyond the commodity price itself.

Key risks to know

  • Gold-price correlation risk (GDX): Mining stocks don't move in lockstep with gold prices. Operational issues, reserve depletion, geopolitical disruptions to specific mines, or management missteps can depress mining-company shares even when gold rallies, or vice versa.
  • Equity-market linkage (GDX): GDX has materially higher beta than GLD (0.81 vs. 0.41), meaning it will decline more steeply during broad equity downturns and may underperform gold bullion as a hedge during equity crises.
  • Currency and geopolitical exposure (GDX): Gold miners operate globally and earn revenue in multiple currencies. Foreign-exchange movements and political instability at mining sites introduce volatility independent of gold prices.
  • No income comparison (GLD): GLD's 0.00% distribution rate reflects its pass-through structure; it returns no dividends to holders, so all returns depend on gold-price appreciation. GDX's 0.70% yield comes from dividends paid by mining companies, which can be cut if cash flows tighten.

Bottom line

If you want pure commodity exposure to hedge portfolio equity risk or track gold-price movements, GLD's lower cost, larger size, and lower beta make it the simpler choice. If you're bullish on gold prices and believe mining companies can compound returns through operational leverage or sector consolidation, GDX's equity upside may appeal—but it adds company-specific and geopolitical risk that GLD avoids. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.