DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

TDAQ vs QQQI vs GPIQ vs QDTE: Nasdaq Income Strategies

TDAQ and GPIQ both seek income from Nasdaq-100 exposure, but TDAQ writes calls that expire the same trading day, while GPIQ uses a dynamic overwrite strategy. QDTE combines synthetic Nasdaq-100 exposure with daily 0DTE calls; QQQI holds index constituents and can buy and sell NDX calls. Compare implementation and net total return before ranking payout rates.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Portfolio fit

  • GPIQNasdaq-100-oriented equities with a dynamic option overwrite.
  • QDTESynthetic Nasdaq-100 exposure, daily 0DTE calls, and weekly distributions.
  • QQQINasdaq-100 constituents with actively managed bought and sold index calls.
  • TDAQNasdaq-100 exposure with calls that expire the same trading day.

Compare the current numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested ยท ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

TDAQ tops the group over the trailing twelve months with a 23.81% total return, against GPIQ at 23.08%, QDTE at 22.67% and QQQI at 18.23%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Sep 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
GPIQ18.90%23.08%25.18%17.1%0.951.38-9.5%
QDTE17.67%22.67%25.75%18.3%0.871.21-10.2%
QQQI14.86%18.23%20.27%16.7%0.731.04-9.6%
TDAQ18.86%23.81%27.12%19.6%0.861.22-11.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. โ€œSince Sep 2025โ€ measures every fund from September 4, 2025 โ€” the start of shared available history โ€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) โ€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window โ€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricGPIQQDTEQQQITDAQ
Forward distribution rate10.28%19.75%13.69%16.83%
Trailing 12-month yield9.86%44.08%13.76%16.54%
30-day SEC yieldโ€”โ€”-0.05%-0.24%
Return of capitalโ€”100.00%โ€”โ€”

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on GPIQ vs QQQ, QDTE vs QQQ, QQQI vs QQQ, TDAQ vs QQQ.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricGPIQQDTEQQQITDAQ
Full nameGoldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETFRoundhill Nasdaq-100ยฎ 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETFNEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETFTappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsRoundhill InvestmentsNEOSTappAlpha
Last Close$57.98 as of September 30, 2026$29.21 as of September 30, 2026$55.55 as of September 30, 2026$27.24 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate10.28%19.75%13.69%16.83%
Trailing 12-month yield9.86%44.08%13.76%16.54%
30-day SEC yieldโ€”โ€”-0.05%-0.24%
Distribution Safety Scoreโ„ข 84748479
Safety-Adjusted Yield 8.64%14.62%11.50%13.30%
Expense ratio0.29%0.96%0.68%0.83%
AUM$6.12B$983M$15.0B$386M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyWeeklyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexNasdaq-100Nasdaq-100Nasdaq-100Invesco QQQ Trust (QQQ)
ObjectiveSeeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in companies included in the Nasdaq-100 and selling call options with exposure to the benchmark.Seeks weekly income by investing at least 80% of net assets in instruments that provide exposure to the Nasdaq-100 Index and writing zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) call options against that exposure.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.The TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF (the "Fund") seeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation. The Fundโ€™s secondary investment objective is to seek exposure to the performance of the Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 ("QQQ"), subject to a limit on potential investment gains.
Asset classEquityEquityEquityEquity
Inception date10/24/202303/07/202401/29/202409/04/2025
Beta1.09641.19031.05531.287
Last dividend$0.49683$0.110957 declared, pays 10/02/2026$0.6339$0.382
Ex-dividend date09/01/202610/01/2026 upcoming09/16/202609/15/2026

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. GPIQ, QDTE, QQQI, and TDAQ generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time โ€” the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs48
Total AUM$68.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Goldman Sachs Asset Management is known for offering a comprehensive suite of ETFs spanning traditional and alternative investment strategies across multiple asset classes. The fund lineup encompasses income-focused offerings, factor-based strategies, thematic investments, ESG solutions, international exposure, commodities, bonds, and indexed products, reflecting a broad approach to meeting diverse investor needs. The issuer's portfolio demonstrates significant breadth, with funds serving income investors, factor-based strategists, and those seeking specialized exposure to emerging themes and alternative assets.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GPIQ.

ETFs56
Total AUM$39.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QDTE.

ETFs19
Total AUM$34.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on QQQI.

ETFs5
Total AUM$830M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks โ€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

TappAlpha operates a focused ETF lineup of four funds organized around two main families: Growth & Daily Income and Tยฒ Lift Series. The company's fund offerings span growth-oriented strategies and daily income approaches, with ticker symbols including TDAQ, TDAX, TSPY, and TSYX that target investors seeking regular income generation or equity growth exposure. As a smaller, specialized ETF provider, TappAlpha positions itself in a niche segment of the ETF market focused on daily income strategies and differentiated growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on TDAQ.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years โ€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

GPIQ (Goldman Sachs Nasdaq-100 Premium Income ETF), QDTE (Roundhill Nasdaq-100ยฎ 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF), QQQI (NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF), TDAQ (TappAlpha Innovation 100 Growth & Daily Income ETF) are dividend ETFs that take different approaches.

QDTE offers the highest reported yield at 19.75%, followed by TDAQ at 16.83%, QQQI at 13.69%, GPIQ at 10.28%.

GPIQ is the cheapest with an expense ratio of 0.29%, compared to 0.68% for QQQI and 0.83% for TDAQ and 0.96% for QDTE.

QQQI is the largest fund by assets ($15.0B), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment: GPIQ generates ~$85.67 cash per distribution, QDTE generates ~$37.98 cash per distribution, QQQI generates ~$114.08 cash per distribution, TDAQ generates ~$140.25 cash per distribution at current distribution rates.

GPIQ yield10.28%
QDTE yield19.75%
QQQI yield13.69%
TDAQ yield16.83%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000: GPIQ costs ~$290, QDTE costs ~$960, QQQI costs ~$680, TDAQ costs ~$830 in fees (simplified, not compounded).

GPIQ ER0.29%
QDTE ER0.96%
QQQI ER0.68%
TDAQ ER0.83%

Strategy & risk

TDAQ and GPIQ both seek income from Nasdaq-100 exposure, but TDAQ writes calls that expire the same trading day, while GPIQ uses a dynamic overwrite strategy. QDTE combines synthetic Nasdaq-100 exposure with daily 0DTE calls; QQQI holds index constituents and can buy and sell NDX calls. Compare implementation and net total return before ranking payout rates.

GPIQ beta1.0964
QDTE beta1.1903
QQQI beta1.0553
TDAQ beta1.287

Fund details

GPIQ is managed by Goldman Sachs (launched 10/24/2023) with $6.12B in assets. QDTE is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 03/07/2024) with $983M in assets. QQQI is managed by NEOS (launched 01/29/2024) with $15.0B in assets. TDAQ is managed by TappAlpha (launched 09/04/2025) with $386M in assets.

GPIQ AUM$6.12B
QDTE AUM$983M
QQQI AUM$15.0B
TDAQ AUM$386M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor โ€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

TDAQ vs GPIQ: what is the main strategy difference?

TDAQ writes calls on its Nasdaq-100 exposure that expire the same day. GPIQ uses a dynamically managed option overwrite. Both retain equity downside and give up some potential gains for option premiums. Compare actual option positions, expenses, and net total returns over matching dates.

How do QDTE and QQQI differ from TDAQ and GPIQ?

QDTE obtains synthetic long Nasdaq-100 exposure through options and sells daily 0DTE calls. QQQI invests in Nasdaq-100 constituents and may combine sold and purchased NDX calls. These implementations differ even though the funds share a Nasdaq-oriented investment universe.

Do weekly distributions mean QDTE writes weekly options?

No. QDTE seeks weekly distributions but sells calls that expire on the same day they are traded. A payment schedule does not establish an option's maturity. Daily option activity also does not promise daily cash payments to shareholders.

Does the highest distribution rate identify the best fund?

No. Distributions are cash payments, not a total-return forecast. Review net total return, NAV history, distribution sources, and fees together. Payments can change, and none of these funds guarantees principal. Use current issuer tax notices to evaluate distribution character.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings โ€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.