DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

GPIX vs SPYI: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF and NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated May 20, 2026

ETFs2
Total AUM$7.6B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Goldman Sachs operates a focused ETF lineup of two income-focused funds designed to provide dividend and yield-generating strategies for investors. The fund family includes GPIQ and GPIX, which concentrate on delivering regular income distributions through their respective investment approaches. With a specialized niche in the income ETF space, Goldman Sachs maintains a streamlined portfolio that emphasizes yield-oriented strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GPIX.

ETFs19
Total AUM$25.4B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for specializing in income-focused ETFs that employ option strategies and enhanced yield mechanisms across equities, fixed income, and alternative assets. The firm operates 19 funds organized around themes including covered call strategies (such as QQQH, SPYH, and QQQI), high-income equity products, hedged equity income, and enhanced fixed income solutions, with notable tickers covering broad market indices and technology-heavy benchmarks. NEOS distinguishes itself through a niche focus on yield enhancement and income generation across diverse asset classes, catering to investors seeking above-market distributions through systematic option writing and alternative income strategies.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Side-by-side snapshot

GPIXSPYI
Full nameGoldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsNEOS
Last Close$54.99 as of May 20, 2026$53.54 as of May 20, 2026
Distribution yield8.16%11.73%
Expense ratio0.29%0.68%
AUM$3.7B$9.2B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexSPXS&P 500 Index
ObjectiveSeeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in companies included in the S&P 500 and selling call options with exposure to the benchmark.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date03/20/202408/29/2022
Beta0.69
Last dividend$0.38$0.53
Ex-dividend date05/01/202604/22/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 11.73% vs 8.16% for GPIX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

GPIX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.29% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: GPIX is linked to SPX while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI is the larger fund by assets ($9.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, GPIX would generate roughly $68.00/month, while SPYI would produce $97.75/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

GPIX yield8.16%
SPYI yield11.73%
Monthly diff on $10K$29.75

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, GPIX would cost approximately $290 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $390.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

GPIX ER0.29%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

GPIX tracks SPX with a s&p500 approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index using an options strategy.

GPIX beta
SPYI beta0.69

Fund details

GPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs (launched 03/20/2024) with $3.7B in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $9.2B in assets.

GPIX AUM$3.7B
SPYI AUM$9.2B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is GPIX or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between GPIX and SPYI?

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF) tracks SPX with a s&p500 strategy, while SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach. They are issued by Goldman Sachs and NEOS respectively.

Can I hold both GPIX and SPYI?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, GPIX or SPYI?

GPIX has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in GPIX vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in GPIX would generate roughly $68.00 per month ($816.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $97.75 per month ($1,173.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

GPIX vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated April 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

GPIX and SPYI are both S&P 500 option-writing ETFs designed to generate high monthly income. GPIX, launched in March 2024, targets an 8.46% distribution rate by selling covered calls against a core S&P 500 position held by Goldman Sachs. SPYI, older and larger (inception August 2022, $8.1B AUM), pursues a 12.24% distribution rate through a similar options overlay strategy managed by NEOS. The key distinction: SPYI advertises tax efficiency and has nearly three times the stated yield, but carries higher fees and shows material NAV volatility since inception.

How they differ

SPYI's distribution rate is 375 basis points higher than GPIX's (12.24% vs 8.46%), the most obvious difference—but it comes with a 0.68% expense ratio compared to GPIX's 0.29%, eating 39 basis points more annually. GPIX reports a 0.0 beta versus SPYI's 0.69 beta; GPIX's near-zero beta suggests its option collar is tighter or its recent inception means limited rolling-period volatility data, while SPYI's higher beta indicates upside participation but also downside risk during market corrections. SPYI's AUM of $8.1B dwarfs GPIX's $3.2B, providing more liquidity and lower tracking error potential, though SPYI has also experienced a 52-week range of $43.91 to $53.38 (roughly 21.5% drawdown from peak)—wider than GPIX's $42.34 to $53.55 range, despite the younger fund's shorter history.

Who each is best for

GPIX: Conservative income investors with low risk tolerance who prefer a lower yield target in exchange for cheaper fees and potentially lower NAV drag; best suited for taxable accounts where the monthly distributions can be reinvested for compounding.

SPYI: Investors seeking maximum current income and willing to accept higher expenses and derivative-overlay complexity; appropriate for older retirees or those in tax-deferred accounts (IRA, 401k) where the tax-efficiency marketing claim is moot.

Key risks to know

  • Yield sustainability and NAV erosion: SPYI's 12.24% distribution rate significantly exceeds typical S&P 500 total returns (around 10% long-term average), making distributions likely to include return-of-capital; GPIX's 8.46% rate is closer to achievable without principal leakage but still above current dividend yield on the S&P 500 (~1.5%).
  • Options cap on upside: Both funds cap capital gains through call-writing. In strong bull markets, shareholders forgo gains above the strike price; SPYI's 0.69 beta suggests some participation, but the collar limits it.
  • NAV volatility and roll risk: SPYI's 52-week range indicates meaningful price swings unrelated to the underlying index alone; both funds face monthly roll risk (reinitiation of options at unfavorable prices during market rallies or gaps).
  • Fee drag on yield: SPYI's 0.68% fee represents 5.5% of its stated distribution, while GPIX's 0.29% fee takes only 3.4%—a meaningful difference over years.

Bottom line

If you want lower fees and are comfortable with a more modest income target, GPIX's simpler structure and cheaper expense ratio offer a less aggressive alternative. If you prioritize maximum stated income and believe SPYI's tax-efficiency claim justifies the higher cost, SPYI's larger asset base may offer better trading liquidity—but confirm whether its high distribution rate depends on return-of-capital in your prospectus. Both are option-overlay strategies; past performance doesn't guarantee future results, and both will lag the S&P 500 during extended bull runs.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Model these ETFs in your own portfolio

Start a free Dividend Vision account to project monthly income, track overlap across holdings, and compare these funds against anything else in your portfolio.