DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

GPIX vs SPYI: Same Index, Different Income Method

A head-to-head of Goldman's S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF and NEOS's S&P 500 High Income ETF covering how cash is produced, cost, and payout.

Data updated August 19, 2026

Best for

  • GPIXInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • SPYIInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 12.04%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

GPIX has outpaced SPYI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 20.21% total return against 16.82%. Measured from Oct 2023 — when the younger fund began trading — GPIX has compounded at 23.48% a year versus 19.49% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Oct 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
GPIX12.49%20.21%23.48%11.1%1.261.82-7.7%
SPYI9.34%16.82%19.49%10.7%1.031.46-7.7%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 19, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2023” measures every fund from October 26, 2023 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricGPIXSPYI
Full nameGoldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETFNEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF
IssuerGoldman SachsNEOS
Last Close$56.11 as of August 19, 2026$54.04 as of August 19, 2026
Distribution yield8.38%12.04%
Distribution Safety Score™ 8490
Expense ratio0.29%0.68%
AUM$5.46B$11.6B
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
Underlying indexSPXS&P 500 Index
ObjectiveSeeks current income while maintaining prospects for capital appreciation by investing at least 80% of net assets in companies included in the S&P 500 and selling call options with exposure to the benchmark.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date10/24/202308/29/2022
Beta0.85430.7
Last dividend$0.3916$0.5423
Ex-dividend date08/03/202608/19/2026

Bottom lineChoose GPIX if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose SPYI if you want to maximize current income — roughly 12.04%, generated by selling options premium.

GPIX vs SPYI: same index, different overlay

Both funds start with the S&P 500 and sell options for monthly cash. Issuer, tax character, and how much upside is sold should drive the choice, not which yield is larger on one date.

GPIXSPYI
UnderlyingSPXS&P 500 Index
IssuerGoldman SachsNEOS
Income designCore premium overlayHigh-income index-options overlay
Expense ratio0.29%0.68%
Distribution yield8.38%12.04%
Better fit forA lower-cost S&P 500 income sleeveNEOS tax treatment and a higher current payout

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. GPIX and SPYI generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs47
Total AUM$66.8B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Goldman Sachs operates a 15-fund ETF lineup spanning diverse asset classes including bonds, commodities, factor-based strategies, income-focused funds, and international equities. The issuer is known for its specialized offerings in income generation and factor investing, with popular tickers including GSIE (a U.S. equity income fund) and GBIL (a short-duration bond fund). Their fund families emphasize both traditional index-based approaches and actively managed strategies across fixed income, commodities, and international markets.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on GPIX.

ETFs19
Total AUM$32.2B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPYI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF) and SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) are both monthly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPYI offers the higher yield at 12.04% vs 8.38% for GPIX. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

GPIX is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.29% compared to 0.68%.

They track different benchmarks: GPIX is linked to SPX while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

SPYI is the larger fund by assets ($11.6B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose GPIX

Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.29% expense ratio vs 0.68% for SPYI.

Choose SPYI

NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — SPYI distributes roughly 12.04% from selling options premium, vs 8.38% for GPIX.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 0.7 vs 0.9 for GPIX.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, GPIX would generate roughly $69.83/month, while SPYI would produce $100.33/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay monthly distributions.

GPIX yield8.38%
SPYI yield12.04%
Monthly diff on $10K$30.50

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, GPIX would cost approximately $290 in fees vs $680 for SPYI (simplified, not compounded). The $390.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

GPIX ER0.29%
SPYI ER0.68%

Strategy & risk

GPIX tracks SPX with a covered call approach, while SPYI tracks S&P 500 Index with an options approach. Beta is 0.8543 for GPIX and 0.7 for SPYI, making SPYI the less volatile of the two by this measure.

GPIX beta0.8543
SPYI beta0.7

Fund details

GPIX is managed by Goldman Sachs (launched 10/24/2023) with $5.46B in assets. SPYI is managed by NEOS (launched 08/29/2022) with $11.6B in assets.

GPIX AUM$5.46B
SPYI AUM$11.6B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between GPIX and SPYI?

Both sit on the S&P 500 and sell options for monthly cash, so GPIX versus SPYI is not a choice between two markets. GPIX (Goldman Sachs S&P 500 Core Premium Income ETF) is Goldman's core premium overlay; SPYI (NEOS S&P 500 High Income ETF) is NEOS's high-income overlay and uses Section 1256 / return-of-capital treatment more often. Cost is 0.29% versus 0.68%; distributions are 8.38% and 12.04% as of August 2026. A higher printed yield usually means more upside sold, not a safer S&P 500. Compare total return and drawdown with the cash figure.

What is the current distribution yield for GPIX and SPYI?

GPIX currently distributes 8.38% and SPYI 12.04%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is GPIX or SPYI better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPYI currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

Can I hold both GPIX and SPYI?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is GPIX or SPYI safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — SPYI scores 90, GPIX scores 84, so SPYI's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. SPYI has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.70 vs 0.85 for GPIX). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, GPIX or SPYI?

GPIX has an expense ratio of 0.29% while SPYI charges 0.68%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in GPIX vs SPYI generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in GPIX would generate roughly $69.83 per month ($838.00 annually). The same in SPYI would produce about $100.33 per month ($1,204.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, GPIX or SPYI?

GPIX has outpaced SPYI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 20.21% total return against 16.82%. Measured from Oct 2023 — when the younger fund began trading — GPIX has compounded at 23.48% a year versus 19.49% for SPYI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

GPIX vs SPYI — at a glance

Generated August 16, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

GPIX and SPYI are both covered-call ETFs built on S&P 500 exposure that aim to generate monthly income by selling call options against their equity holdings. The key distinction: GPIX targets an 8.30% yield with a lower expense ratio, while SPYI pursues a higher 11.69% yield and emphasizes tax efficiency through its derivative overlay strategy.

How they differ

SPYI's 11.69% distribution rate is nearly 3.4 percentage points higher than GPIX's 8.30%, but that premium comes with a cost: a 0.68% expense ratio versus GPIX's 0.29%. SPYI is also the larger fund by AUM ($11.4B vs. $5.36B) and has been operating longer, since August 2022, while GPIX launched in October 2023. Both use call-selling to boost yields, but SPYI's "high income" label and tax-efficiency focus suggest a more aggressive options strategy. GPIX's beta of 0.8543 is slightly higher than SPYI's 0.7, meaning it may track closer to broad market moves, though both are dampened relative to the S&P 500.

Who each is best for

GPIX: Fits investors seeking a S&P 500–linked income stream with modestly elevated yields (in the 8–9% range) who prefer lower ongoing costs and simpler call-selling mechanics.

SPYI: Designed for income-focused allocators willing to accept higher fees in exchange for a substantially elevated distribution rate and a strategy explicitly optimized for tax-deferred growth from options premium.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at elevated distribution yields. SPYI's 11.69% yield lies well above typical corporate dividend growth and suggests reliance on option premium capture and return-of-capital. If call options generate less premium in a lower-volatility or range-bound market, distributions may not sustain at current levels, pressuring NAV.
  • Call strike risk and cap on upside. Both funds sell calls to generate income, which means their equity exposure is capped at the strike price. In a strong bull market, both will underperform the S&P 500 by design, as gains above the strike are forgone.
  • Expense ratio drag at similar beta. SPYI's 0.68% expense ratio is more than double GPIX's 0.29%, reducing net returns by roughly 39 basis points annually before considering yield differences—a meaningful drag if realized returns prove modest.
  • Concentration in S&P 500 constituents. Both funds hold at least 80% in S&P 500 stocks, meaning they carry large-cap U.S. equity concentration risk and lack diversification outside domestic mega-cap exposure.
  • Options pricing uncertainty. The sustainability and size of distributions depend on realized volatility and call-option demand. A prolonged period of low implied volatility could reduce premium capture and force distribution cuts.

Bottom line

SPYI's higher yield appeals to investors prioritizing maximum current income from a S&P 500 core position, but its fee structure and distribution level raise questions about long-term NAV stability. GPIX offers a more conservative yield paired with lower costs, making it a fit for those seeking call-enhanced income without betting on sustained elevated option premiums. Either way, both cap upside in strong rallies—a real cost in sustained bull markets.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.