Generated September 19, 2026.
Overview
IDV and SCHY are both international dividend ETFs tracking Dow Jones dividend indexes, but they differ materially in scope, cost, and age. IDV targets 100 high-dividend payers across Europe, the Pacific, Asia, and Canada via the EPAC Select Dividend Index, while SCHY tracks the International Dividend 100 Index with a narrower geographic focus (excluding North America). IDV has been running since 06/11/2007, while SCHY launched 04/29/2021 — a nearly 14-year gap that matters for performance history.
How they differ
The biggest distinction is cost: SCHY charges 0.08% against IDV's 0.50%, a 42-basis-point gap that compounds meaningfully over time on a $10,000 position. IDV's 4.83% yield edges SCHY's 4.37%, but that difference partly reflects IDV's broader geographic universe and larger AUM ($8.51B vs. $2.60B). IDV's lower beta of 0.71 suggests it has historically moved less sharply with broad market swings than SCHY's 0.81, though both remain closely tethered to international equity markets. Both distribute Quarterly, so reinvestment timing and frequency are identical.
Who each is best for
IDV: Fits investors seeking a diversified basket of 100 international dividend payers with nearly two decades of track record and modest downside dampening relative to the broader market.
SCHY: Fits cost-conscious investors willing to accept a newer fund and slightly narrower geographic exposure in exchange for significantly lower fees and competitive yield.
Key risks to know
- Geographic overlap and currency exposure. Both funds concentrate in developed markets outside North America and carry currency risk that can amplify or dampen dollar-denominated returns. Their index universes may overlap considerably, so holdings are likely to be correlated.
- Index-tracking divergence. SCHY, as a newer fund, has a shorter performance history against its benchmark; IDV's longer track record allows comparison, but neither guarantees future tracking precision.
- Dividend sustainability in international equities. International dividend payers face sector concentration (financials, energy, real estate) and are vulnerable to policy changes, currency headwinds, and economic slowdowns that can force dividend cuts or suspensions.
- Beta and drawdown risk. Both carry meaningful equity beta; during market downturns, these funds will decline. IDV's lower beta suggests slightly less volatility, but both remain equity-like in their downside exposure.
Bottom line
If you prioritize lower fees and are comfortable with a newer fund, SCHY's 0.08% cost structure and 4.37% yield offer strong value. If you value longer operating history, broader geographic reach, and a touch of downside dampening, IDV's 0.71 beta and $8.51B in AUM provide a more seasoned alternative — though you'll pay for it. Past performance does not predict future results; dividend policy and currency movements will ultimately drive returns for both.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.