DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IDVO vs NIHI: International Income Strategies Compared

IDVO selects international dividend-paying ADRs and writes calls tactically on individual securities. NIHI invests in ETFs tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index and adds index options. Their international labels hide different country coverage, security selection and option implementation.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • IDVOInvestors who want active ADR selection with tactical calls and accept concentration.
  • NIHIInvestors who want EAFE-linked exposure with index options and accept foreign-market losses.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

IDVO has outpaced NIHI over the trailing twelve months, posting a 18.03% total return against 13.97%. Measured from Sep 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” IDVO has compounded at 18.34% a year versus 13.64% for NIHI. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulativeSince Sep 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IDVO10.17%18.03%18.34%16.8%0.721.03-10.4%
NIHI7.53%13.97%13.64%14.3%0.600.86-10.9%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. β€œSince Sep 2025” measures every fund from September 17, 2025 β€” the start of shared available history β€” so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) β€” higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β€” shallower is better.

Distribution rate and SEC yield

MetricIDVONIHI
Forward distribution rate6.13%9.82%
Trailing 12-month yield5.97%10.45%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”2.73%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIDVONIHI
Full nameAmplify CWP International Enhanced Dividend Income ETFNEOS MSCI EAFE High Income ETF
IssuerAmplify ETFsNEOS
Underlying indexa basket of Amplify Interest Rate Hedged Dividend Income ETF holdingsMSCI EAFE Investable Market Index
Last Close$41.54 as of September 30, 2026$50.93 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate6.13%9.82%
Trailing 12-month yield5.97%10.45%
30-day SEC yieldβ€”2.73%
Distribution Safety Scoreβ„’ 9079
Safety-Adjusted Yield 5.52%7.76%
Expense ratio0.65%0.68%
AUM$1.46B$207M
Distribution frequencyMonthlyMonthly
ObjectiveSeeks to provide income from international dividend-paying stocks through ADRs and by opportunistically writing covered calls on those securities. Invests in high-quality international large and mid-cap companies with a history of dividend and earnings growth.Seeks to generate high monthly income in a tax efficient manner while targeting equity appreciation.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date09/08/202209/17/2025
Beta0.530.8129
Last dividend$0.21235 payable today$0.4168
Ex-dividend date09/29/202609/16/2026

Bottom lineChoose IDVO if you want active ADR selection with tactical calls and accept concentration. Choose NIHI if you want EAFE-linked exposure with index options and accept foreign-market losses. Only after checking their actual country and company exposures. IDVO's selected ADRs need not match NIHI's EAFE universe. Their option overlays also operate at different levels. Compare holdings, total expenses including acquired fund costs, and same-period total return before treating their distributions as interchangeable.

IDVO vs NIHI: International Income Strategies Compared

IDVO selects international dividend-paying ADRs and writes calls tactically on individual securities. NIHI invests in ETFs tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index and adds index options. Their international labels hide different country coverage, security selection and option implementation.

IDVONIHI
ApproachSelected ADRs and tactical stock callsEAFE-tracking ETFs and index options
Risk reviewADR, currency and stock-selection riskForeign-market, currency and options risk
Expense ratio0.65%0.68%
Portfolio fitReview combined holdings and weightsReview combined holdings and weights

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. NIHI generates income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time β€” the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs46
Total AUM$16.8B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Amplify ETFs is known for offering specialized, thematic investment solutions across diverse market segments including digital assets, commodities, and dividend strategies. The issuer's lineup spans multiple fund families covering income-focused strategies, covered call approaches, commodity exposure, and thematic sectors such as cybersecurity, blockchain, gaming, and sustainable investing. Notable for tickers like BLOK (blockchain), HACK (cybersecurity), and DIVO (dividend), Amplify combines traditional income strategies with alternative themes and emerging asset classes, appealing to investors seeking both yield and exposure to innovation-driven sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IDVO.

ETFs19
Total AUM$34.7B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks β€” the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

NEOS is known for developing specialized income-focused ETFs that employ strategies like covered calls, hedging, and enhanced yields across various asset classes. The firm manages 19 funds organized into nine distinct families, including offerings in equity high income, fixed income enhancement, digital assets, and alternative strategies, with popular tickers like SPYI (S&P 500 covered call), QQQI (Nasdaq-100 covered call), and QQQH (Nasdaq-100 hedged equity income). NEOS distinguishes itself in the ETF landscape through its emphasis on income generation and downside protection strategies rather than traditional growth approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NIHI.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β€” free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

IDVO selects international dividend-paying ADRs and writes calls tactically on individual securities. NIHI invests in ETFs tracking the MSCI EAFE Investable Market Index and adds index options. Their international labels hide different country coverage, security selection and option implementation.

Only after checking their actual country and company exposures. IDVO's selected ADRs need not match NIHI's EAFE universe. Their option overlays also operate at different levels. Compare holdings, total expenses including acquired fund costs, and same-period total return before treating their distributions as interchangeable.

Deep dive

Compare the full cost of the exposure

For a fund investing through other funds, distinguish the management fee from total operating expenses. Use the current prospectus, including any waiver period, rather than assuming a headline fee covers every layer of cost.

Continue the comparison

DIVO vs IDVO Β· IDVO vs SCHY

Strategy sources checked September 27, 2026: IDVO issuer material Β· NIHI issuer material.

Current metrics use the dated snapshot above. Distributions can vary and may include return of capital; a distribution rate is not an expected total return.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor β€” if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Are IDVO and NIHI substitutes for the same international allocation?

Only after checking their actual country and company exposures. IDVO's selected ADRs need not match NIHI's EAFE universe. Their option overlays also operate at different levels. Compare holdings, total expenses including acquired fund costs, and same-period total return before treating their distributions as interchangeable.

How should I compare risk and ownership costs?

Use matching dates and definitions for returns, distributions, and fees. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection. Check current bid-ask spreads and premiums or discounts; AUM alone does not determine the price available for your order.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare IDVO with

Popular comparisons

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings β€” forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.