Generated August 8, 2026.
Overview
IGRO and SCHY are both international dividend-focused ETFs that track different indexes of non-U.S. dividend-paying equities. The key distinction is selectivity: IGRO targets companies with consistent dividend growth and caps dividend yield at the 90th percentile, while SCHY simply picks the 100 highest-yielding international dividend payers from its universe, without a growth requirement or yield ceiling. This makes IGRO a growth-tilted dividend strategy and SCHY a yield-tilted one.
How they differ
The most fundamental difference is index philosophy. IGRO's Morningstar index excludes companies in the top decile by yield and requires a documented history of growing dividends; SCHY's Dow Jones index selects the 100 highest-yielding names with no growth filter. That structural difference shows up immediately: IGRO yields 5.12% versus SCHY's 4.24%, a 88-basis-point spread, reflecting SCHY's broader, less concentrated yield screen. IGRO also carries lower beta (0.74 vs. 0.81), suggesting its dividend-growth filter may skew toward more defensive names. Both are cheap to own—IGRO's 0.15% expense ratio edges SCHY's 0.14%—and SCHY has larger assets under management at $2.52B compared to IGRO's $1.30B.
Who each is best for
IGRO: Fits investors seeking international dividend exposure paired with the discipline of dividend growth, accepting a lower yield for potential capital appreciation and lower volatility.
SCHY: Fits investors prioritizing current yield from international equities, willing to own a broader, less filtered set of dividend payers without a growth mandate.
Key risks to know
- Index concentration and turnover differences. IGRO's stricter criteria (growth history, yield cap, sub-75% payout ratio) create a narrower opportunity set than SCHY's top-100 approach, potentially reducing diversification and raising concentration risk in names that pass the filter. SCHY's larger universe may experience different rebalancing patterns.
- Yield sustainability gap. SCHY's 4.24% yield reflects a simpler dividend-yield screen without payout-ratio constraints; some holdings may have elevated payout ratios or unstable dividend histories. IGRO's 5.12% yield comes with a growth requirement, but that doesn't eliminate the risk that economic weakness or sector rotation could pressure dividend-paying stocks broadly.
- Emerging market exposure variation. Both track international ex-U.S. equities, but index construction differences mean their EM weightings may vary. Emerging market dividend stocks are more sensitive to currency fluctuation and policy shifts than developed-market dividend names.
- Lower beta does not equal lower drawdown risk. IGRO's 0.74 beta is lower than SCHY's 0.81, but beta measures market sensitivity, not downside magnitude; dividend-focused stocks can still experience sharp declines if rates rise sharply or growth stalls.
Bottom line
If you prioritize dividend growth and a steadier risk profile, IGRO's selectivity and lower beta appeal; if you want maximum current yield from a simpler, broader dividend screen, SCHY's higher yield and larger asset base may fit better. Past performance does not guarantee future results, and both funds' returns depend on continued dividend stability across non-U.S. markets.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.