DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

IONQ vs IOYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of IonQ, Inc. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs94
Total AUM$11.9B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. The firm manages 48 ETFs organized around distinct fund families including Autocallable products, Commodities, Income strategies, Leveraged exposures, and their YieldBOOST line designed to enhance distributions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IOYY.

Side-by-side snapshot

IONQIOYY
Full nameIonQ, Inc.GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF
IssuerGraniteShares
Last Close$34.24 as of July 21, 2026$7.04 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield99.79%
Distribution Safety Score™ 34
Expense ratio1.07%
AUM$6.42M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying indexIonQ (IONQ)
ObjectiveDevelops trapped-ion quantum computers and provides cloud-based quantum computing access to enterprise, government, and research customers.Seeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to IonQ, with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A11/04/2025
Beta3.23
Last dividend$0.1350
Ex-dividend date07/17/2026

Bottom lineChoose IONQ if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose IOYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 99.79%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: IOYY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while IONQ keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IOYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 32.5% against 95.0% for IONQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTDSince Nov 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IONQ-26.79%-35.86%95.0%-0.72-1.06-55.1%
IOYY-31.99%-37.08%32.5%-2.19-2.75-42.2%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Nov 2025” measures every fund from November 4, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Nov 2025. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Nov 2025) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) is a stock, while IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

IOYY currently shows a 99.79% distribution yield. IONQ has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IONQ has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while IOYY would produce $831.58/month, at current distribution rates.

IONQ yield
IOYY yield99.79%

Cost & efficiency

IOYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio — roughly $1,070 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). IONQ is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

IOYY ER1.07%

Strategy & risk

IONQ is a stock, while IOYY tracks IonQ (IONQ) with an options approach.

IONQ beta3.23
IOYY beta

Security details

IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) is a stock. IOYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 11/04/2025) with $6.42M in assets.

IOYY AUM$6.42M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Which of IONQ or IOYY pays more dividend income?

IOYY currently reports a distribution yield, while IONQ has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between IONQ and IOYY?

IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) is a stock, while IOYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST IONQ ETF) tracks IonQ (IONQ) with an options approach. They are issued by — and GraniteShares respectively.

Can I hold both IONQ and IOYY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, IONQ or IOYY?

IOYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio. IONQ is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in IONQ vs IOYY generate?

At current rates, IONQ has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in IOYY would produce about $831.58 per month ($9,979.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IONQ or IOYY?

IOYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 32.5% against 95.0% for IONQ. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

IONQ vs IOYY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

IONQ is the underlying quantum-computing company itself—a pure-play equity stake in a technology developer. IOYY is a newly launched options-income ETF that sells weekly put spreads on a leveraged IONQ derivative product, targeting a 100.10% annualized distribution rate. The core difference is structural: one is equity ownership; the other is a synthetic-income vehicle layered on top of leveraged IONQ exposure.

How they differ

IONQ is a straightforward equity holding with no distributions, a beta of 3.23, and full upside participation if the company's quantum-computing business accelerates. IOYY wraps leveraged IONQ exposure inside a weekly options-selling strategy, generating a 100.10% distribution rate but charging 1.07% annually and reporting a beta of 0.0—a signal that the options collar structure is intended to dampen price swings, though the underlying leverage reintroduces risk. IOYY's $7.34M asset base and November 2025 inception make it a micro-cap, brand-new fund; IONQ itself has been trading since January 2021 and has far deeper liquidity.

The second-order difference is income source and tax treatment. IONQ generates no distributions, so returns are purely capital appreciation. IOYY manufactures weekly income through options premiums, which are typically taxed as short-term capital gains or ordinary income. The 100.10% distribution rate suggests the fund is returning substantially more than the underlying IONQ price change alone—relying on leverage and systematic option selling to generate cash.

Third, IOYY's zero beta is the most material caveat: it reflects the mechanics of a short put spread, not a true absence of market risk. The leveraged IONQ ETF sitting in the fund's portfolio still moves; the collar merely caps downside and capped upside, creating a synthetic floor-and-ceiling payoff that doesn't map cleanly to traditional beta.

Who each is best for

IONQ: Investors with a long time horizon and high risk tolerance who want unhedged exposure to quantum-computing development and believe the company's technology roadmap will drive significant capital appreciation over years.

IOYY: Investors seeking weekly cash flow from a high-yield options strategy who can tolerate compressed upside potential, understand that a 100%+ distribution rate relies on leverage and systematic premium collection, and accept the risks of a very new, tiny fund with untested redemption dynamics.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. A 100.10% annual distribution rate funded by option premium and leverage is difficult to sustain if the underlying IONQ position stagnates or declines; the fund may face pressure to cut distributions, eroding NAV for holders who entered expecting that yield to continue.
  • Leverage and volatility concentration. IOYY's strategy depends on selling options on a leveraged IONQ product. IONQ itself has a 3.23 beta—already volatile—and layering leverage on top amplifies that swing, even though the collar structure tries to contain it. A sharp IONQ decline could force the put spread into the money, crystallizing losses.
  • Liquidity and AUM risk in a nascent fund. At $7.34M in assets and only six weeks of operating history, IOYY faces potential closure or restructuring if it doesn't grow; creeping outflows could spiral into forced portfolio liquidation, and the bid-ask spread on the ETF shares themselves may be wide enough to erode entry or exit prices.
  • Regulatory and counterparty risk on derivatives. IOYY's weekly option activity introduces ongoing counterparty and clearing risk; changes in SEC rules around options strategies or leverage could force the fund to modify or wind down its approach.
  • IONQ quantum-computing execution risk. Both holdings depend on IonQ's ability to develop commercially viable trapped-ion quantum systems and retain customers; slow hardware progress or a shift in enterprise computing priorities could impair the company for years.

Bottom line

If you want direct equity participation in IONQ's quantum computing roadmap with no artificial income drag, IONQ is the simpler, more liquid vehicle. If you prioritize weekly cash flow and accept that leverage plus options selling will dampen upside while trying to limit downside, IOYY offers that tradeoff—but at the cost of extreme distribution sustainability risk and exposure to a fund with minimal operating history. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.