DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IWD vs IWF: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 13, 2026

Best for

  • IWDInvestors who want higher current income (1.18% vs 0.34% for IWF).
  • IWFInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIWDIWF
Full nameiShares Russell 1000 Value ETFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
IssueriSharesiShares
Last Close$257.77 as of August 13, 2026$124.42 as of August 13, 2026
Distribution yield1.18%0.34%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9890
Expense ratio0.19%0.19%
AUM$83.6B$127B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexRussell 1000 Value IndexRussell 1000 Growth Index
ObjectiveProvide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/22/200005/22/2000
Beta0.791.2
Last dividend$0.7610$0.1068
Ex-dividend date06/15/202606/15/2026

Bottom lineChoose IWD if you want higher current income (1.18% vs 0.34% for IWF). Choose IWF if you want broad equity exposure.

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

iShares
ETFs469
Total AUM$4661B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IWD and IWF.

See all iShares ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IWD has outpaced IWF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 34.25% total return against 12.22%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — IWF has compounded at 17.75% a year, ahead of IWD at 11.63%. IWD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.1% against 19.6% for IWF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince May 2000Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IWD22.32%34.25%19.29%11.72%11.63%8.39%13.1%1.011.45-15.7%
IWF5.68%12.22%22.32%12.73%17.75%8.43%19.6%0.801.15-23.4%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since May 2000” measures every fund from May 26, 2000 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) and IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

IWD offers the higher yield at 1.18% vs 0.34% for IWF. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

They track different benchmarks: IWD is linked to Russell 1000 Value Index while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

IWF is the larger fund by assets ($127B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IWD would generate roughly $9.83/month, while IWF would produce $2.83/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IWD yield1.18%
IWF yield0.34%
Monthly diff on $10K$7.00

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IWD would cost approximately $190 in fees vs $190 for IWF (simplified, not compounded). Both charge the same expense ratio.

IWD ER0.19%
IWF ER0.19%

Strategy & risk

IWD tracks Russell 1000 Value Index with an index approach, while IWF tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index with an index approach. Beta is 0.79 for IWD and 1.2 for IWF, indicating IWD is less volatile relative to the market.

IWD beta0.79
IWF beta1.2

Fund details

IWD is managed by iShares (launched 05/22/2000) with $83.6B in assets. IWF is managed by iShares (launched 05/22/2000) with $127B in assets.

IWD AUM$83.6B
IWF AUM$127B
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for IWD and IWF?

IWD currently distributes 1.18% and IWF 0.34%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IWD or IWF better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. IWD currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IWD and IWF?

IWD (iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF) tracks Russell 1000 Value Index with an index approach, while IWF (iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF) tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index with an index approach. They are issued by iShares and iShares respectively.

Can I hold both IWD and IWF?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IWD or IWF safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — IWD scores 98, IWF scores 90, so IWD's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. IWD has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.79 vs 1.20 for IWF). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, IWD or IWF?

IWD and IWF both charge the same expense ratio of 0.19%, so neither is cheaper on fees — pick based on yield, strategy, or underlying index instead.

How much income does $10,000 in IWD vs IWF generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IWD would generate roughly $9.83 per month ($118.00 annually). The same in IWF would produce about $2.83 per month ($34.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IWD or IWF?

IWD has outpaced IWF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 34.25% total return against 12.22%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — IWF has compounded at 17.75% a year, ahead of IWD at 11.63%. IWD has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 13.1% against 19.6% for IWF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

People also compare IWF with

IWF vs VUG

Popular comparisons

JEPI vs JEPQSCHD vs VYMVOO vs VTIJEPI vs SCHD

IWD vs IWF — at a glance

Generated August 8, 2026.

Overview

IWD and IWF are both iShares index ETFs launched on the same day and tracking different slices of the Russell 1000. IWD targets large-cap value stocks, while IWF targets large-cap growth stocks. The key distinction is not just the companies they hold, but their income profile and volatility characteristics—value stocks tend to pay higher dividends and move less sharply than growth stocks.

How they differ

IWD's 1.18% distribution rate versus IWF's 0.34% is the headline difference: value stocks in IWD's Russell 1000 Value Index typically return more cash to shareholders, while growth stocks in IWF reinvest more earnings. IWF is significantly larger by assets under management ($127B versus $83.6B), suggesting broader adoption among investors. On volatility, IWD has a beta of 0.8—meaning it typically moves less than the overall market—while IWF's beta of 1.19 indicates it amplifies market swings. Both charge the same 0.19% expense ratio and distribute quarterly.

Who each is best for

IWD: Fits investors seeking current income alongside equity exposure and preferring lower portfolio volatility. Appeals to those with a multi-decade horizon who can reinvest distributions.

IWF: Designed for growth-focused investors who tolerate higher short-term swings and can accept minimal current distributions, prioritizing capital appreciation over income.

Key risks to know

  • Style concentration. IWD and IWF express opposing style bets; periods when value underperforms growth (or vice versa) will create meaningful tracking divergence between them. Their holdings may overlap, so style rotation affects both, but in opposite directions.
  • Interest-rate sensitivity. Rising rates historically favor value stocks (IWD) and pressure growth stocks (IWF), since growth valuations depend heavily on discounting distant earnings. Falling rates reverse this dynamic.
  • Beta disparity. IWF's 1.19 beta means it will decline harder in market downturns and rise faster in rallies than IWD's 0.8 beta. An investor holding IWF during a sharp correction should expect losses that exceed the broad market decline.
  • Reinvestment risk for IWD. A 1.18% distribution rate requires quarterly reinvestment; if dividend income falls or the underlying companies cut payouts, IWD's yield could compress significantly.

Bottom line

IWD emphasizes income and downside dampening; IWF emphasizes growth and upside participation. If you need regular distribution income and prefer steadier returns, IWD's higher yield and lower beta appeal differently than IWF's growth orientation and amplified volatility. Past performance does not predict future results, and style rotations between value and growth can persist for years.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How to read a fund's stats How expense ratios eat returns Correlation between two funds

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener