DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

IYF vs XLF: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares U.S. Financials ETF and State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated September 4, 2026

Best for

  • IYFInvestors who want broad equity exposure.
  • XLFInvestors who want broad equity exposure.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

IYF has outpaced XLF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 12.45% total return against 10.28%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: IYF has compounded at 13.49% a year, against 13.38% for XLF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince May 2000Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
IYF7.30%12.45%23.53%12.09%13.49%7.10%16.7%1.001.41-16.6%
XLF6.69%10.28%21.07%10.72%13.38%6.14%16.1%0.911.29-15.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 4, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; windows of one year or longer are annualized. “Since May 2000” measures every fund from May 31, 2000 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricIYFXLF
Full nameiShares U.S. Financials ETFState Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
IssueriSharesState Street
Underlying indexDow Jones U.S. Financials IndexFinancial Select Sector Index
Last Close$138.02 as of September 4, 2026$58.10 as of September 4, 2026
Distribution yield1.10%1.29%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10095
Safety-Adjusted Yield 1.10%1.23%
Expense ratio0.37%0.08%
AUM$4.25B$54.2B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
ObjectiveTracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index.Provide exposure to the fund's underlying index or strategy per issuer materials.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date05/22/200012/16/1998
Beta0.80.72
Last dividend$0.38$0.187
Ex-dividend date06/15/202606/22/2026

Bottom lineIYF and XLF are both for investors who want broad equity exposure — so strategy isn't the deciding factor here. Cost is: XLF charges 0.08% against 0.37% for IYF, and between two funds this similar that gap comes straight out of your return every year you hold.

Model this comparison:
Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

iShares
ETFs466
Total AUM$4642B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on IYF.

See all iShares ETFs
State Street
ETFs179
Total AUM$2124B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

State Street Global Advisors (SSGA) is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for its flagship SPDR suite of exchange-traded products that serve both institutional and retail investors across a broad range of asset classes. Their 88-fund lineup spans diverse strategies including sector exposure (Select Sector SPDR), income generation (Income and Select Sector SPDR Premium Income families), commodities (including the widely-held GLD gold ETF), bonds, ESG-focused investments, and thematic allocations, with popular tickers like DIA (Diamonds Trust), FEZ (Eurozone exposure), and JNK (high-yield bonds) among their most recognized funds. The issuer is characterized by its comprehensive coverage across multiple market segments and its emphasis on both traditional index-based products and specialized strategies like covered call income funds and factor-based investing.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on XLF.

See all State Street ETFs

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Compare in my portfolio Forecast income Save to watchlist

Quick verdict

IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) and XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

XLF offers the higher yield at 1.29% vs 1.10% for IYF. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

XLF is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.08% compared to 0.37%.

They have different reference exposures: IYF is linked to Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index while XLF is linked to Financial Select Sector Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

XLF is the larger fund by assets ($54.2B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, IYF would generate roughly $9.17/month, while XLF would produce $10.75/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

IYF yield1.10%
XLF yield1.29%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.58

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, IYF would cost approximately $370 in fees vs $80 for XLF (simplified, not compounded). The $290.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

IYF ER0.37%
XLF ER0.08%

Strategy & risk

IYF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while XLF tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. Beta is 0.8 for IYF and 0.72 for XLF, making XLF the less volatile of the two by this measure.

IYF beta0.8
XLF beta0.72

Fund details

IYF is managed by iShares (launched 05/22/2000) with $4.25B in assets. XLF is managed by State Street (launched 12/16/1998) with $54.2B in assets.

IYF AUM$4.25B
XLF AUM$54.2B
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for IYF and XLF?

IYF currently distributes 1.10% and XLF 1.29%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is IYF or XLF better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. XLF currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between IYF and XLF?

IYF (iShares U.S. Financials ETF) tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while XLF (State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF) tracks Financial Select Sector Index with an index approach. They are issued by iShares and State Street respectively.

Can I hold both IYF and XLF?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is IYF or XLF safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — IYF scores 100, XLF scores 95, so IYF's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

Which has lower fees, IYF or XLF?

IYF has an expense ratio of 0.37% while XLF charges 0.08%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in IYF vs XLF generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in IYF would generate roughly $9.17 per month ($110.00 annually). The same in XLF would produce about $10.75 per month ($129.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, IYF or XLF?

IYF has outpaced XLF over the trailing twelve months, posting a 12.45% total return against 10.28%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: IYF has compounded at 13.49% a year, against 13.38% for XLF. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

IYF vs XLF — at a glance

Generated August 29, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

IYF and XLF are both large, broad-market financial sector ETFs tracking different financial indices. The key distinction is their underlying exposure: IYF follows the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index, while XLF tracks the Financial Select Sector Index (the financials component of the S&P 500). This difference shapes their holdings, fee structures, and yields. XLF also carries roughly 13 times more assets ($54.2B versus $4.25B), reflecting its status as the dominant sector SPDR product and giving it tighter bid-ask spreads. On yield, XLF edges IYF with a 1.29% distribution rate versus 1.10%, though both pay quarterly. Beta-wise, they're similar—XLF at 0.72 and IYF at 0.8—suggesting comparable downside cushioning relative to the broader market, though XLF's holdings may emphasize slightly larger or less volatile financial names given its S&P 500 subset focus.

Who each is best for

IYF: Fits investors seeking broader exposure across the Dow Jones financial universe, including mid-cap and smaller financial stocks that the S&P 500 financials subset may underweight or exclude.

XLF: Designed for investors building a core equity allocation who want the largest, most liquid financial sector instrument with the lowest embedded costs and tightest trading spreads.

Key risks to know

  • Index concentration overlap: Both ETFs track broad financial indices, but their holdings may differ meaningfully. IYF may hold regional banks and mid-cap financials absent from XLF's S&P 500 financials segment, introducing sector divergence risk that isn't immediately visible.
  • Interest rate sensitivity: Financial stocks, particularly banks and insurers that dominate both funds, tend to underperform when the yield curve flattens or rates decline sharply, since net interest margins compress. This is structural to the asset class, not unique to these ETFs.
  • Economic cycle dependence: Both funds' performance hinges on credit growth, loan demand, and underwriting fees tied to deal activity. In recession or prolonged low-growth periods, financial earnings compress, dragging both funds lower.

Bottom line

If you prioritize cost efficiency and maximum liquidity in a core financial sector position, XLF's expense ratio advantage and $54.2B scale stand out. If you want broader exposure beyond S&P 500 financials and are comfortable with a higher fee, IYF offers a slightly different mix of holdings. The decision hinges on whether the broader Dow Jones financial universe justifies IYF's extra fee relative to your time horizon. Past performance of either index does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How to read a fund's stats How expense ratios eat returns Correlation between two funds

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener