DV
Dividend Vision

Stock Comparison

KMB vs PG: A Paper-and-Tissue Book, or the Full Household Aisle?

A head-to-head of Kimberly-Clark and Procter & Gamble covering dividends, brand mix, and size.

Data updated August 21, 2026

Best for

  • KMBInvestors who want higher current income (4.62% vs 2.97% for PG).
  • PGInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

KMB has lagged PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.12% total return against -6.63%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: PG has compounded at 8.15% a year, against 1.87% for KMB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1Y3Y5Y10YSince Mar 1980Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
KMB9.13%-15.12%-1.33%-1.13%1.87%9.62%22.0%-0.27-0.34-34.1%
PG4.31%-6.63%1.05%2.55%8.15%12.84%17.8%-0.19-0.26-21.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Mar 1980” measures every fund from March 17, 1980 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricKMBPG
Full nameKimberly-Clark CorporationThe Procter & Gamble Company
Issuer
Last Close$109.31 as of August 21, 2026$144.68 as of August 21, 2026
Distribution yield4.62%2.97%
Distribution Safety Score™ 9999
Expense ratio
AUM
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying index
ObjectiveManufactures and markets personal care and consumer tissue products worldwide including Huggies, Kleenex, Scott, and Cottonelle brands.Provides branded consumer packaged goods including beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and home care products worldwide.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/AN/A
Beta0.2760.377
Last dividend$1.2800$1.0890
Ex-dividend date09/04/202607/24/2026

Bottom lineChoose KMB if you want higher current income (4.62% vs 2.97% for PG). Choose PG if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.

KMB vs PG: tissue specialist or household giant?

Both are Dividend Kings in household products. Kimberly-Clark is concentrated in paper and personal care; P&G is the broader aisle.

KMBPG
MixPaper, tissue, personal careFull household and beauty aisle
PayoutQuarterly dividendQuarterly dividend
Distribution yield4.62%2.97%

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.

KMB offers the higher yield at 4.62% vs 2.97% for PG. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, KMB would generate roughly $38.50/month, while PG would produce $24.75/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

KMB yield4.62%
PG yield2.97%
Monthly diff on $10K$13.75

Strategy & risk

KMB is a stock built around personal care products exposure, while PG is a stock built around consumer products exposure. Beta is 0.276 for KMB and 0.377 for PG, making KMB the less volatile of the two by this measure.

KMB beta0.276
PG beta0.377

Security details

KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock. PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between KMB and PG?

Both are Dividend Kings in household products and pay quarterly. KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) distributes 4.62% and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) distributes 2.97% as of August 2026. Kimberly-Clark is concentrated in paper, tissue, and personal care; P&G spreads across the household aisle. Mix and scale, not a small yield gap, are the decision.

What is the current distribution yield for KMB and PG?

KMB currently distributes 4.62% and PG 2.97%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is KMB or PG better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. KMB currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between KMB and PG?

KMB (Kimberly-Clark Corporation) is a stock built around personal care products exposure, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock built around consumer products exposure. They are issued by — and — respectively.

Can I hold both KMB and PG?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is KMB or PG safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: KMB scores 99, PG scores 99. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

How much income does $10,000 in KMB vs PG generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in KMB would generate roughly $38.50 per month ($462.00 annually). The same in PG would produce about $24.75 per month ($297.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, KMB or PG?

KMB has lagged PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -15.12% total return against -6.63%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: PG has compounded at 8.15% a year, against 1.87% for KMB. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.