Stock Comparison
KO vs PG: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of The Coca-Cola Company and The Procter & Gamble Company covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Data updated August 13, 2026
Best for
- KOInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
- PGInvestors who want higher current income (2.96% vs 2.41% for KO).
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric | KO | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | The Coca-Cola Company | The Procter & Gamble Company |
| Issuer | — | — |
| Last Close | $86.71 as of August 13, 2026 | $144.08 as of August 13, 2026 |
| Distribution yield | 2.41% | 2.96% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 99 | 99 |
| Expense ratio | — | — |
| AUM | — | — |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | Manufactures, distributes, and markets nonalcoholic beverage concentrates, syrups, and finished beverages worldwide. | Provides branded consumer packaged goods including beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and home care products worldwide. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.342 | 0.377 |
| Last dividend | $0.5300 | $1.0890 |
| Ex-dividend date | 09/15/2026 | 07/24/2026 |
Bottom lineChoose KO if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose PG if you want higher current income (2.96% vs 2.41% for KO).
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
KO has outpaced PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 26.03% total return against -4.30%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: KO has compounded at 10.47% a year, against 8.11% for PG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Since Jan 1962 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO | 27.13% | 26.03% | 15.90% | 12.12% | 10.47% | 12.12% | 16.4% | 0.63 | 0.95 | -15.5% |
| PG | 3.88% | -4.30% | 0.03% | 2.81% | 8.11% | 10.05% | 17.8% | -0.25 | -0.34 | -21.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 12, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jan 1962” measures every fund from January 2, 1962 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Quick verdict
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.
PG offers the higher yield at 2.96% vs 2.41% for KO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Still deciding? Track KO & PG for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, KO would generate roughly $20.08/month, while PG would produce $24.67/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Strategy & risk
KO is a stock, while PG is a stock. Beta is 0.342 for KO and 0.377 for PG, indicating KO is less volatile relative to the market.
Security details
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock. PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.
Frequently asked questions
What is the current distribution yield for KO and PG?
KO currently distributes 2.41% and PG 2.96%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
Is KO or PG better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. PG currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between KO and PG?
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. They are issued by — and — respectively.
Can I hold both KO and PG?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Is KO or PG safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: KO scores 99, PG scores 99. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
How much income does $10,000 in KO vs PG generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in KO would generate roughly $20.08 per month ($241.00 annually). The same in PG would produce about $24.67 per month ($296.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, KO or PG?
KO has outpaced PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 26.03% total return against -4.30%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: KO has compounded at 10.47% a year, against 8.11% for PG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare KO with
Popular comparisons
KO vs PG — at a glance
Generated August 8, 2026.
Overview
Coca-Cola (KO) and Procter & Gamble (PG) are both dividend-paying stocks in the consumer staples sector, built on durable brand portfolios and long histories of returning cash to shareholders. The core difference is exposure: KO is pure-play beverages, while PG spans a broader base of personal care, health, and home products. PG's yield is 52 basis points higher, and its beta suggests slightly more sensitivity to market moves, though both stocks exhibit the defensive characteristics typical of mature consumer companies.
How they differ
KO generates revenue exclusively from nonalcoholic beverages—concentrates, syrups, and finished drinks sold globally—making it a single-category play. PG diversifies across beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and home care, spreading earnings across multiple consumer needs and geographies. On yield, PG offers 2.92% versus KO's 2.40%, a meaningful gap for income-focused investors. KO's beta of 0.342 is lower than PG's 0.377, indicating KO has historically moved less with market swings, though both trade with less volatility than the broad market. Both pay quarterly dividends and share a January 1962 inception date, reflecting their status as foundational American blue-chip stocks.
Who each is best for
KO: Fits investors seeking a narrowly focused, lower-volatility exposure to the global beverage market, with a willingness to accept a lower yield in exchange for simpler category exposure and historically steadier stock movement.
PG: Fits investors comfortable with a household-products conglomerate model and wanting slightly higher current income, with exposure to multiple consumer categories and the trade-off of marginally higher volatility than KO.
Key risks to know
- Beverage-category concentration (KO). A single-category company is vulnerable to category-wide headwinds—shifting consumer preferences away from sugary or carbonated beverages, rising commodity costs in a specific supply chain, or regulatory pressures on ingredients or packaging that affect the entire category.
- Broader macroeconomic sensitivity (PG). While PG's wider product mix provides some hedging, its exposure to consumer discretionary segments within beauty and grooming creates more sensitivity to consumer confidence and spending shifts than KO's essential-beverage focus.
- Dividend sustainability at low growth rates. Both stocks trade on the strength of their dividend histories, but mature consumer companies often face modest underlying earnings growth. If capital returns significantly outpace business growth for extended periods, payout ratios can become stretched.
- Currency headwinds. Both derive substantial revenue internationally; unfavorable forex movements can compress reported earnings even if local-currency sales remain steady.
Bottom line
KO and PG offer different flavors of consumer-staples dividend income: KO appeals if you want a defensive single-category play with a lower yield and steadier price action; PG appeals if you prioritize a wider product moat and a higher current yield, accepting slightly more volatility. Past performance does not predict future returns, and both stocks' dividend sustainability depends on continued competitive strength and earnings growth in their respective markets.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.