Stock Comparison
KO vs PG: Beverage or Household-Product Dividends?
Coca-Cola's business centers on beverages and its global bottling system. P&G sells branded household, personal-care, and health products. Both face competition, input costs, and foreign-currency exposure. Compare earnings and free cash flow supporting the dividends, not just yield.
Updated September 30, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
100% reinvested Β· ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
KO has outpaced PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a 33.81% total return against -2.59%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: KO has compounded at 10.81% a year, against 8.02% for PG. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | 3Y annualized | 5Y annualized | 10Y annualized | Since Jan 1962 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KO | 26.96% | 33.81% | 19.18% | 13.47% | 10.81% | 12.09% | 16.5% | 0.79 | 1.21 | -15.5% |
| PG | 4.74% | -2.59% | 2.70% | 3.07% | 8.02% | 10.05% | 18.0% | -0.10 | -0.14 | -21.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. βSince Jan 1962β measures every fund from January 2, 1962 β the start of shared available history β so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) β higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window β shallower is better.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Full name | The Coca-Cola Company | The Procter & Gamble Company |
| Issuer | β | β |
| Last Close | $86.08 as of September 30, 2026 | $145.28 as of September 30, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 2.46% | 2.95% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 2.44% | 2.95% |
| Distribution Safety Scoreβ’ | 99 | 99 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 2.44% | 2.92% |
| Expense ratio | β | β |
| AUM | β | β |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | β | β |
| Objective | Manufactures, distributes, and markets nonalcoholic beverage concentrates, syrups, and finished beverages worldwide. | Provides branded consumer packaged goods including beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and home care products worldwide. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.342 | 0.377 |
| Last dividend | $0.53 declared, pays 10/01/2026 | $1.089 |
| Ex-dividend date | 09/15/2026 | 07/24/2026 |
Bottom lineKO and PG are nearly interchangeable β both offer very similar beverages exposure with very similar cost and risk. Neither charges a fund expense ratio, so the decision rests on business fundamentals, payout history, and valuation.
Two individual businesses with different consumer exposures
Coca-Cola's business centers on beverages and its global bottling system. P&G sells branded household, personal-care, and health products. Both face competition, input costs, and foreign-currency exposure. Compare earnings and free cash flow supporting the dividends, not just yield.
| KO | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| Approach | Global beverage business | Household, personal-care, and health products |
| Risk review | Beverage demand, bottling execution, input costs, and currencies | Brand competition, consumer demand, input costs, and currencies |
| Expense ratio | β | β |
| Portfolio fit | Review combined holdings and weights | Review combined holdings and weights |
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years β free to start, no credit card.
Quick verdict
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.
PG offers the higher yield at 2.95% vs 2.46% for KO. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Still deciding? Track KO & PG for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, KO would generate roughly $61.50 cash per distribution, while PG would produce $73.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Strategy & risk
Coca-Cola's business centers on beverages and its global bottling system. P&G sells branded household, personal-care, and health products. Both face competition, input costs, and foreign-currency exposure. Compare earnings and free cash flow supporting the dividends, not just yield. Beta describes historical benchmark sensitivity, not guaranteed downside protection.
Security details
KO (The Coca-Cola Company) is a stock. PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor β if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.
Frequently asked questions
Does a lower KO or PG share price mean the stock is cheaper?
No. Share counts and stock splits affect the price per share. Compare valuation relative to earnings or cash flow, debt, and growth assumptions. For dividend durability, review cash-flow coverage and capital needs. Owning two established companies still leaves company-specific risk.
How should I compare risk and ownership costs?
These are individual stocks, so an ETF expense ratio is not the relevant ownership cost. Review spreads, any broker charges, and taxes. Compare valuation and cash-flow coverage separately from trading costs.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare KO with
Popular comparisons
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings β forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.