Stock Comparison
MA vs V: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Mastercard Inc. and Visa Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated September 30, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
MA has lagged V over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.33% total return against 6.48%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — MA has compounded at 19.24% a year, ahead of V at 16.75%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | 3Y annualized | 5Y annualized | 10Y annualized | Since Mar 2008 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MA | -1.59% | -2.33% | 12.37% | 9.97% | 19.24% | 19.94% | 20.6% | 0.35 | 0.48 | -20.9% |
| V | 4.33% | 6.48% | 16.74% | 10.48% | 16.75% | 19.92% | 20.3% | 0.55 | 0.77 | -20.4% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Mar 2008” measures every fund from March 19, 2008 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  MA |  V |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Mastercard Inc. | Visa Inc. |
| Issuer | — | — |
| Last Close | $551.47 as of September 30, 2026 | $359.33 as of September 30, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | 0.63% | 0.75% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | 0.61% | 0.75% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 100 | 100 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | 0.63% | 0.75% |
| Expense ratio | — | — |
| AUM | — | — |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | — | — |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.735 | 0.761 |
| Last dividend | $0.87 | $0.67 |
| Ex-dividend date | 07/09/2026 | 08/11/2026 |
Bottom lineMA and V are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar financials exposure with very similar cost and risk. Neither charges a fund expense ratio, so the decision rests on business fundamentals, payout history, and valuation.
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.
Quick verdict
MA (Mastercard Inc.) and V (Visa Inc.) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.
V offers the higher yield at 0.75% vs 0.63% for MA. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Still deciding? Track MA & V for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, MA would generate roughly $15.75 cash per distribution, while V would produce $18.75 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Strategy & risk
MA is a stock built around financials exposure, while V is a stock built around financials exposure. Beta is 0.735 for MA and 0.761 for V — effectively similar market sensitivity.
Security details
MA (Mastercard Inc.) is a stock. V (Visa Inc.) is a stock.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.
Frequently asked questions
What is the current distribution rate for MA and V?
MA currently distributes 0.63% and V 0.75%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
Is MA or V better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. V currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between MA and V?
MA (Mastercard Inc.) is a stock built around financials exposure, while V (Visa Inc.) is a stock built around financials exposure. They are issued by — and — respectively.
Can I hold both MA and V?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Is MA or V safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: MA scores 100, V scores 100. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
How much income does $10,000 in MA vs V generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in MA would generate roughly $15.75 cash per distribution ($63.00 annually). The same in V would produce about $18.75 cash per distribution ($75.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, MA or V?
MA has lagged V over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.33% total return against 6.48%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — MA has compounded at 19.24% a year, ahead of V at 16.75%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
Popular comparisons
MA vs V — at a glance
Generated September 26, 2026.
Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.
Overview
Mastercard and Visa are both payments-processing stocks in the financials sector, each commanding enormous scale in global transaction networks. They're structurally similar — both oligopolists collecting fees on credit and debit flows — but they differ in geographic mix, revenue concentration, and recent operational trajectory. Both pay modest dividends and trade at premium valuations typical of high-return-on-capital businesses.
How they differ
Mastercard trades at a higher absolute price ($551.47 vs. $359.33) and carries slightly lower beta (0.735 vs. 0.761), suggesting marginally less sensitivity to broad market moves. The most meaningful difference is in dividend yield: Visa distributes 0.75% while Mastercard pays 0.63%, a gap that reflects different capital-allocation philosophies — Visa has returned more cash to shareholders via dividends in recent years, while Mastercard has favored share buybacks and reinvestment. Both pay quarterly; neither is a high-yield play. Both stocks have traded for well over a decade, with Mastercard's listing preceding Visa's by 18 years.
Who each is best for
- MA: Fits investors seeking exposure to a payments processor with lower current-year volatility relative to the market, paired with modest dividend growth and a tilt toward capital-appreciation returns over current income.
- V: Fits investors who prefer a higher current dividend yield within the payments-processor space, accepting modestly higher beta in exchange for a stronger income component relative to Mastercard.
Key risks to know
- Regulatory and antitrust risk: Both companies face ongoing scrutiny from U.S. and international regulators on interchange fees and network rules. Changes to fee structures or permitted business practices could compress margins and limit growth.
- Economic sensitivity: Payment-volume growth ties tightly to consumer spending and cross-border travel. Recessions, financial stress, or travel disruptions can slow transaction flows and fee revenue.
- Technology and competitive disruption: Both face long-term pressure from alternative payment rails — buy-now-pay-later services, cryptocurrencies, and direct bank-to-bank transfers — that could eventually erode network reliance.
- Foreign exchange and geographic concentration: Visa derives a larger share of revenue internationally than Mastercard, creating currency-translation risk; Mastercard's U.S. exposure brings different regulatory and competitive pressures.
Bottom line
If you value lower near-term volatility and expect capital appreciation to drive returns, Mastercard's lower beta and modest yield may align with your approach. If you prioritize current income within the payments sector, Visa's higher distribution rate offers a modest but measurable edge. Both are mature, oligopolistic businesses facing structural headwinds from regulatory pressure and disruptive payment technologies — neither offers inflation-beating yield, and valuation multiples leave little room for disappointment.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.