DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MARA vs MARO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Marathon Digital Holdings Inc. and YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

ETFs60
Total AUM$9.78B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MARO.

Side-by-side snapshot

MARAMARO
Full nameMarathon Digital Holdings Inc.YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF
IssuerYieldMax
Last Close$12.05 as of July 8, 2026$5.33 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield99.90%
Distribution Safety Score 34
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$82.6M
Distribution frequencyWeekly
Underlying indexMarathon Digital (MARA)
ObjectiveCovered Call
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A07/18/2023
Beta5.3712.6951
Last dividend$0.1024
Ex-dividend date07/09/2026

Bottom lineChoose MARA if you want broad equity exposure. Choose MARO if you want to maximize current income — roughly 99.90%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: MARO's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while MARA keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

MARA has outpaced MARO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -28.06% total return against -41.73%. Measured from Dec 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MARA has compounded at -33.37% a year versus -39.97% for MARO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Dec 2024Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
MARA21.59%-28.06%-33.37%78.8%-0.48-0.67-70.5%
MARO2.04%-41.73%-39.97%63.6%-0.92-1.22-66.1%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Dec 2024” measures every fund from December 10, 2024 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

MARA (Marathon Digital Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

MARO currently shows a 99.90% distribution yield. MARA has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MARA has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while MARO would produce $832.50/month, at current distribution rates.

MARA yield
MARO yield99.90%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, MARA would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $1,000 for MARO (simplified, not compounded). The $1,000.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

MARA ER
MARO ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

MARA is a stock, while MARO tracks Marathon Digital (MARA) with a covered call approach. Beta is 5.371 for MARA and 2.6951 for MARO, indicating MARO is less volatile relative to the market.

MARA beta5.371
MARO beta2.6951

Fund details

MARA is managed by — (launched 05/04/2012) with — in assets. MARO is managed by YieldMax (launched 07/18/2023) with $82.6M in assets.

MARA AUM
MARO AUM$82.6M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of MARA or MARO pays more dividend income?

MARO currently reports a distribution yield, while MARA has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between MARA and MARO?

MARA (Marathon Digital Holdings Inc.) is a stock, while MARO (YieldMax MARA Option Income Strategy ETF) tracks Marathon Digital (MARA) with a covered call approach. They are issued by — and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both MARA and MARO?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, MARA or MARO?

MARA has an expense ratio of — while MARO charges 1.00%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in MARA vs MARO generate?

At current rates, MARA has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in MARO would produce about $832.50 per month ($9,990.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, MARA or MARO?

MARA has outpaced MARO over the trailing twelve months, posting a -28.06% total return against -41.73%. Measured from Dec 2024 — when the younger fund began trading — MARA has compounded at -33.37% a year versus -39.97% for MARO. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

MARA vs MARO — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

Marathon Digital Holdings (MARA) is a Bitcoin mining company whose stock price fluctuates with crypto volatility and mining economics. MARO is a covered-call ETF launched in mid-2023 that holds MARA shares and sells call options against them, distributing the premium income weekly at a 95.90% rate. The core tradeoff is between owning the raw stock and owning a leveraged-income wrapper around it.

How they differ

MARA is a direct equity stake in Marathon's mining operations, with a beta of 5.378—meaning it swings roughly five times harder than the broad market. MARO wraps MARA in a covered-call strategy, dampening that volatility to a beta of 2.6951 while generating weekly distributions funded by selling upside. The headline difference: MARO's 95.90% distribution rate is engineered income, not operational earnings. That yield comes from option premiums and systematic capital return, not from Marathon's business cash flow—a critical distinction when evaluating sustainability. MARO charges 1.00% annually and has $82.6M in AUM; MARA has no fund wrapper, no expense ratio, and no forced distributions. The covered-call structure also means MARO's upside is capped near the strike price each week, while MARA participates fully in rallies.

Who each is best for

MARA: Investors with high risk tolerance seeking long-term capital appreciation in cryptocurrency mining, willing to stomach the stock's sharp swings and hold through crypto downturns without needing current income.

MARO: Investors who want current income from MARA's exposure but accept that upside will be systematically capped by weekly call sales, and who are comfortable with lower absolute volatility in exchange for a mechanical yield stream funded by option premiums rather than operating cash flow.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. A 95.90% annualized payout is unsustainable from underlying returns alone and relies on option premium harvesting and return-of-capital treatment. If implied volatility falls or Bitcoin-related sentiment cools, premium income shrinks and distributions may not be maintained at current levels.
  • Capped upside in MARO. Weekly call sales mean MARO will underperform MARA in a sustained Bitcoin rally or mining margin expansion. The opportunity cost of missing sharp upside moves can compound significantly over multi-year horizons.
  • High underlying volatility and beta concentration. Both holdings are entirely exposed to Bitcoin price action and mining profitability. MARA's 5.378 beta reflects that; MARO's lower beta is a ceiling effect—it reduces downside but doesn't eliminate it. A 50% Bitcoin correction would hurt both funds materially.
  • Liquidity and size risk in MARO. At $82.6M in AUM and trading at $5.97, MARO is a small fund with modest trading volume. Exits during market stress could face wider spreads than MARA.
  • Concentration and regulatory risk. Marathon's valuation hinges entirely on Bitcoin economics and mining hardware competitiveness, neither of which are diversified. Regulatory action against crypto mining (energy use, emissions, or licensing) could depress both holdings.

Bottom line

MARA offers direct exposure to Marathon's upside with no drag from fees or options overlays, but with severe volatility. MARO trades upside capture for a steady weekly income stream and lower realized swings, but that income is engineered from option sales rather than business earnings—sustainable only if implied volatility remains elevated. If you want to own Marathon's growth story as is, MARA is the vehicle; if you prioritize current income and can accept capped upside, MARO's mechanical yield may fit your needs. Past performance of either does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.