DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

META vs METW: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Meta Platforms, Inc. and Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated August 21, 2026

Best for

  • METAInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
  • METWInvestors who want higher current income (40.97% vs 0.38% for META).

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

META has outpaced METW over the trailing twelve months, posting a -26.22% total return against -34.06%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — META has compounded at -17.92% a year versus -24.99% for METW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
META-15.30%-26.22%-17.92%38.8%-0.90-1.20-32.5%
METW-20.66%-34.06%-24.99%46.6%-0.99-1.31-39.3%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 18, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricMETAMETW
Full nameMeta Platforms, Inc.Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF
IssuerRoundhill Investments
Last Close$549.90 as of August 21, 2026$22.17 as of August 21, 2026
Distribution yield0.38%40.97%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10029
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$22.4M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyWeekly
Underlying indexMeta (META)
ObjectiveOperates social networking platforms including Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, and Messenger. Invests in augmented and virtual reality through Reality Labs division.METW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Meta Platforms before fees.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A06/18/2025
Beta1.2431.7877
Last dividend$0.5250$0.1747
Ex-dividend date06/15/202608/24/2026

Bottom lineChoose META if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose METW if you want higher current income (40.97% vs 0.38% for META).

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Daily leverage reset. METW targets a multiple of the index's DAILY move, resetting every session. Over weeks and months the compounding of daily resets (volatility decay) can drag returns far below the stated multiple, especially in choppy markets — and losses are magnified the same way gains are.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

ETFs55
Total AUM$38.3B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering innovative, specialized ETFs that often feature weekly dividend distributions and exposure to trending themes and individual mega-cap stocks. Their lineup spans income-focused strategies, leveraged products, thematic investments in areas like cryptocurrency and artificial intelligence, and weekly-pay funds that appeal to investors seeking frequent distributions. The issuer has built a distinctive niche with products targeting both traditional income seekers and those interested in emerging sectors, offering a diverse range of tickers that go well beyond conventional dividend vehicles.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on METW.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock, while METW (Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

METW offers the higher yield at 40.97% vs 0.38% for META. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Who should choose each?

Choose META

Meta Platforms, Inc.

  • Want direct stock ownership — full upside and dividend growth potential, no fund wrapper or expense ratio.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.2 vs 1.8 for METW.

Choose METW

Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF

  • Want higher current income — METW yields 40.97% vs 0.38% for META.
  • Want broad equity exposure.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, META would generate roughly $3.17/month, while METW would produce $341.42/month, at current distribution rates.

META yield0.38%
METW yield40.97%
Monthly diff on $10K$338.25

Cost & efficiency

METW charges a 1.00% expense ratio — roughly $1,000 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). META is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

METW ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

META is a stock built around social media exposure, while METW tracks Meta (META) with a leverage approach. Beta is 1.243 for META and 1.7877 for METW, making META the less volatile of the two by this measure.

META beta1.243
METW beta1.7877

Security details

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock. METW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 06/18/2025) with $22.4M in assets.

METW AUM$22.4M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution yield for META and METW?

META currently distributes 0.38% and METW 40.97%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is META or METW better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. METW currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between META and METW?

META (Meta Platforms, Inc.) is a stock built around social media exposure, while METW (Roundhill META WeeklyPay ETF) tracks Meta (META) with a leverage approach. They are issued by — and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both META and METW?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is META or METW safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — META scores 100, METW scores 29, so META's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. META has also shown lower price volatility (beta 1.24 vs 1.79 for METW). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, META or METW?

METW charges a 1.00% expense ratio. META is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in META vs METW generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in META would generate roughly $3.17 per month ($38.00 annually). The same in METW would produce about $341.42 per month ($4,097.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, META or METW?

META has outpaced METW over the trailing twelve months, posting a -26.22% total return against -34.06%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — META has compounded at -17.92% a year versus -24.99% for METW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

META vs METW — at a glance

Generated August 15, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

META is Meta Platforms, a social media and digital advertising stock trading at $589.85 with a 0.36% dividend yield paid quarterly. METW is a newly launched ETF that wraps META stock with leverage and options strategies to target weekly payouts of 52.95% annually—roughly 147 times META's own yield—while aiming to deliver 120% of META's weekly total return before fees.

How they differ

The fundamental difference is leverage and payout structure. METW uses options overlays and leverage to generate weekly distributions totaling 52.95% per year, versus META's 0.36% quarterly dividend. That gap—a 147-fold yield pickup—comes from the ETF's mandate to amplify returns and distribute realized gains and option premiums weekly, rather than letting capital compound. METW's beta of 1.7877 reflects this amplification: for every 1% move in META, the ETF targets roughly 1.79%, before accounting for its 1.00% expense ratio drag. The ETF has only $25.6M in assets and inception on 06/18/2025, so it's extremely new; META stock has been public since 2012 and trades in a much deeper, more liquid market.

Who each is best for

  • META: Fits investors seeking long-term capital appreciation in a dominant digital advertising and social media business, with modest quarterly distributions treated as a secondary income stream rather than the core return driver.
  • METW: Fits investors with a high risk tolerance and a short time horizon who are comfortable with significant NAV erosion in exchange for aggressive weekly income, and who understand that leveraged options strategies decay over time.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion and yield sustainability: METW's 52.95% distribution rate far exceeds any realistic underlying total return and will require continuous return-of-capital treatment and options premium harvesting. Over time, NAV is likely to deteriorate unless META's stock price rallies sharply or implied volatility stays elevated enough to sustain option premium collection.
  • Leverage and amplified drawdown risk: METW's 1.7877 beta means sharp declines in META will translate to steeper losses in the ETF. A 20% drop in META could push METW down roughly 36% or more, compounded by ongoing distributions that eat into remaining capital.
  • Single-stock concentration and volatility: METW holds only META; it carries no diversification. Regulatory action, advertiser pressure, platform shifts, or earnings disappointments at META flow directly into METW performance with amplified force.
  • Options decay and volatility dependence: The weekly distribution structure depends on harvesting realized gains and option premium. If META's implied volatility compresses or the stock trades sideways, premium collection declines, squeezing the fund's ability to meet its distribution target without accelerating NAV loss.
  • Extreme youth and liquidity risk: METW launched in June 2025 and holds only $25.6M in assets. Track record is nonexistent; redemption risk and possible fund closure are material concerns if investor appetite fades.

Bottom line

If you seek diversified, sustainable income and long-term ownership of a world-class platform business, META's 0.36% yield and stock structure are straightforward. If you're instead chasing maximum weekly income with the understanding that it relies on accelerating capital loss and complex options mechanics, METW may appeal—but its newness, small size, leverage, and single-stock exposure make it a speculative tool, not a savings vehicle. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.