DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

MSFT vs MSFY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Microsoft Corporation and Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

Kurv
ETFs15
Total AUM$493M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Kurv is known for creating single-stock and sector-focused covered call ETFs that generate income from individual mega-cap companies and technology stocks. The issuer's 12-fund lineup emphasizes income strategies, including covered call funds on popular stocks like Apple (AAPY), Amazon (AMZP), Tesla (TSLP), and Netflix (NFLP), alongside precious metals income funds and broader growth-and-income options. Kurv's niche centers on delivering yield through options strategies applied to recognizable, high-profile securities rather than broad market indexes.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MSFY.

See all Kurv ETFs

Side-by-side snapshot

MSFTMSFY
Full nameMicrosoft CorporationKurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF
Issuer—Kurv
Last Close$397.75 as of July 21, 2026$17.60 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield0.92%13.64%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10066
Expense ratio—0.99%
AUM—$11.6M
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyMonthly
Underlying index—Microsoft (MSFT)
ObjectiveDevelops, licenses, and supports a wide range of software products, services, and devices. Operates Azure cloud platform, Office productivity suite, LinkedIn, and gaming division.Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft (MSFT) ETF seeks to provide current income while maintaining the opportunity for exposure to the share price of the common stock of Microsoft Corporation, subject to a limit on potential investment gains.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A10/30/2023
Beta1.13—
Last dividend$0.9100$0.2000
Ex-dividend date08/20/202607/15/2026

Bottom lineChoose MSFT if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose MSFY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 13.64%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: MSFY's payout comes from selling options, which caps upside and can erode the share price over time, while MSFT keeps full price exposure.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Build a sample portfolio Forecast income

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

MSFT has lagged MSFY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -21.57% total return against -21.28%. Measured from Oct 2023 — when the younger fund began trading — MSFT has compounded at 6.90% a year versus 2.39% for MSFY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Oct 2023Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
MSFT-15.71%-21.57%6.90%27.7%-1.04-1.35-34.6%
MSFY-18.90%-21.28%2.39%29.7%-0.96-1.23-35.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Oct 2023” measures every fund from October 31, 2023 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

MSFY offers the higher yield at 13.64% vs 0.92% for MSFT. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MSFT would generate roughly $7.67/month, while MSFY would produce $113.67/month, at current distribution rates.

MSFT yield0.92%
MSFY yield13.64%
Monthly diff on $10K$106.00

Cost & efficiency

MSFY charges a 0.99% expense ratio — roughly $990 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). MSFT is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

MSFY ER0.99%

Strategy & risk

MSFT is a stock, while MSFY tracks Microsoft (MSFT) with a covered call approach.

MSFT beta1.13
MSFY beta—

Security details

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock. MSFY is managed by Kurv (launched 10/30/2023) with $11.6M in assets.

MSFY AUM$11.6M
Ready to act?
Open in Comparator Model in portfolio See pricing

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Is MSFT or MSFY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. MSFY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between MSFT and MSFY?

MSFT (Microsoft Corporation) is a stock, while MSFY (Kurv Yield Premium Strategy Microsoft ETF) tracks Microsoft (MSFT) with a covered call approach. They are issued by — and Kurv respectively.

Can I hold both MSFT and MSFY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, MSFT or MSFY?

MSFY charges a 0.99% expense ratio. MSFT is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in MSFT vs MSFY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in MSFT would generate roughly $7.67 per month ($92.00 annually). The same in MSFY would produce about $113.67 per month ($1,364.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, MSFT or MSFY?

MSFT has lagged MSFY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -21.57% total return against -21.28%. Measured from Oct 2023 — when the younger fund began trading — MSFT has compounded at 6.90% a year versus 2.39% for MSFY. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

MSFT vs MSFY — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

MSFT is Microsoft Corporation's common stock, a mega-cap software and cloud computing company that pays a modest 0.95% dividend quarterly. MSFY is a single-stock options-income ETF launched in late 2023 that wraps MSFT exposure inside a covered-call strategy, targeting a 14.15% distribution yield paid monthly. The two offer radically different return profiles: one is a growth equity stake with baseline dividend income; the other is a synthetic-income vehicle designed to harvest option premiums on the same underlying company.

How they differ

The core difference is strategy: MSFT is direct equity ownership with capital appreciation as the primary return driver, while MSFY uses covered calls—selling upside call options against MSFT shares—to generate monthly cash flow. That fundamental approach cascades into yield divergence: MSFT's 0.95% distribution comes from actual corporate earnings; MSFY's 14.15% blends a small dividend component with systematic option premium sales, capping your upside if MSFT rallies sharply. Cost and structure matter too: MSFT has no stated expense drag beyond implicit bid-ask spreads, while MSFY charges 0.99% annually and operates as an ETF with a tiny $10.9M asset base, raising liquidity and closure risk concerns. MSFY also carries a reported beta of 0.0, reflecting its synthetic-income design that intentionally dampens equity-market correlation through the call-selling overlay.

Who each is best for

MSFT: Investors with a multi-year or longer horizon who view Microsoft's cloud, productivity, and gaming franchises as core equity holdings and are comfortable with price fluctuation in exchange for long-term capital growth, with dividend income as a secondary benefit.

MSFY: Investors seeking high current monthly income from Microsoft exposure who accept a price-appreciation ceiling in exchange for regular option premium distribution, and who have the risk tolerance and monitoring discipline for a synthetic-income overlay vehicle.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion risk from high distribution yield. A 14.15% annual distribution on a $16.96 share price implies the fund is returning roughly 8–9% of NAV monthly. If underlying MSFT returns do not keep pace, MSFY will erode principal over time; this risk intensifies if market volatility or implied volatility collapses, reducing the premium available from call sales.
  • Call assignment and upside cap. MSFY's covered-call strategy will limit gains if MSFT rallies sharply. Calls assigned before a major earnings jump or product announcement mean investors miss that appreciation while having already collected the capped premium.
  • Concentration and single-stock risk. Both funds have 100% exposure to Microsoft's operational, regulatory, and competitive risks. A material decline in cloud adoption, competitive pressure from Amazon Web Services or Google Cloud, or antitrust action affects both equally, though MSFY's income stream amplifies the pain during downturns.
  • Small AUM and fund viability. MSFY's $10.9M in assets is extremely thin for an ETF. Persistent underperformance of distributions, investor outflows, or a strategic pivot by Kurv could trigger a fund closure, forcing redemption at an inopportune time or NAV discount.
  • Beta reporting and market correlation. MSFY's reported 0.0 beta reflects its options-overlay design but may be misleading during sharp market declines; assignment and liquidity constraints could cause actual downside exposure to diverge from the stated synthetic beta.

Bottom line

If you want growth and are patient with a low dividend yield, MSFT is straightforward equity ownership with Microsoft's long-term upside intact. If you prioritize high monthly income and accept a hard cap on price appreciation, MSFY's covered-call wrapper offers synthetic yield—but at the cost of principal erosion risk if distributions outpace underlying gains, plus the concentration and small-fund-viability risks that attach to any single-stock options vehicle. Past performance of either fund does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

How covered-call funds work How to read a fund's stats The covered-call opportunity cost

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

Start Free Open in Comparator Browse Screener