MSTR
Not rated
No published distribution safety rating is available.
Security Comparison
MSTR vs MTYY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?
A head-to-head comparison of Strategy Inc. and GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.
Updated November 6, 2026
How these figures are calculated: methodology.
Best for
- MSTRInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
- MTYYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 40.47%, generated by selling options premium.
Price and total return
Compare the same available dates. Add a ticker or benchmark below; these controls change the chart only. The snapshot and article describe the original comparison.
Interactive history loads here. The snapshot and period returns remain available when chart history cannot be loaded.
Distribution Safety Score
An estimate of distribution reliability, not price or principal safety, a probability, or a guarantee. Score methodology.
MTYY
High risk
High confidence
Score snapshot as of . Method 1.11.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  MSTR |  MTYY |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | Strategy Inc. | GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF |
| Issuer | — | GraniteShares |
| Last Close | $128.93 as of November 6, 2026 | $15.95 as of November 6, 2026 |
| Distribution rate | — | 40.47% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 203.55% |
| 30-day SEC yield | — | 1.38% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | — | 15 |
| Safety-Adjusted Yield | — | 6.07% |
| Expense ratio | — | 1.07% |
| AUM | — | $1.18M |
| Distribution frequency | None | Weekly |
| Underlying index | — | Strategy (MSTR) |
| Objective | Operates an enterprise analytics software business while pursuing a Bitcoin treasury reserve strategy, accumulating one of the largest corporate Bitcoin balance sheets. | Seeks to provide weekly income through selling near-the-money put spreads on leveraged ETFs linked to Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy), with built-in risk control through the put spread collar structure. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | 09/23/2025 |
| Beta | 3.611 | — |
| Last dividend | — | $0.12413 declared, pays 11/10/2026 |
| Ex-dividend date | — | 11/06/2026 |
Total returns
100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.
MSTR has outpaced MTYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -49.29% total return against -58.46%. Measured from Sep 2025 — the start of shared available history — MSTR has compounded at -56.51% a year versus -66.68% for MTYY. MTYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 28.7% against 81.3% for MSTR. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD cumulative | 1Y cumulative | Since Sep 2025 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSTR | -14.91% | -49.29% | -56.51% | 81.3% | -0.89 | -1.28 | -67.7% |
| MTYY | -35.68% | -58.46% | -66.68% | 28.7% | -3.21 | -3.74 | -59.3% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of November 5, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Sep 2025” measures every fund from September 23, 2025 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Distribution rate and SEC yield
| Metric | MSTR | MTYY |
|---|---|---|
| Forward distribution rate | — | 40.47% |
| Trailing 12-month yield | — | 203.55% |
| 30-day SEC yield | — | 1.38% |
Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.
Not a distribution payer
MSTR (Strategy Inc.) has no distribution rate on file and its distribution frequency is None. MSTR is not a payer. The blank yield is not a zero yield.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Bottom lineChoose MSTR if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee. Choose MTYY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 40.47%, generated by selling options premium. There's no free lunch: MTYY's payout comes from selling puts, which adds losses when the market falls and can erode the share price over time, while MSTR has no option overlay.
How the risk works
Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.
- Added downside and premium dependence. MTYY generates income by selling puts, which adds losses when the underlying falls; the premium collected is the most the puts can earn. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the strategy cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.
Learn the mechanics: Return of capital, explained · NAV erosion, explained
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.
ETFs93
Total AUM$9.40B
ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.
GraniteShares is known for offering specialized ETF strategies that extend beyond traditional equity and bond investing, particularly through structured products and income-focused solutions. GraniteShares targets investors seeking alternative income generation methods and commodity access, with popular tickers like AHD, CRY, and FBL representing their diverse approach to yield enhancement and alternative asset classes.
See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MTYY.
Quick verdict
MSTR (Strategy Inc.) is a stock, while MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF) is an ETF — their trading structures differ.
MTYY currently shows a 40.47% distribution yield. MSTR has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment at current distribution rates, MSTR has no reported distribution yield yet, so a cash estimate is not available, while MTYY would pay about $4,047.00 a year (about $77.83 per weekly distribution).
MSTR yield—
MTYY yield40.47%
Cost & efficiency
MTYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio — roughly $1,070 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). MSTR is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.
MTYY ER1.07%
Strategy & risk
MSTR is a stock built around software exposure, while MTYY tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a crypto approach.
MSTR beta3.611
MTYY beta—
Security details
MSTR (Strategy Inc.) is a stock. MTYY is managed by GraniteShares (launched 09/23/2025) with $1.18M in assets.
MTYY AUM$1.18M
Frequently asked questions
Which of MSTR or MTYY pays more dividend income?
MTYY currently reports a distribution yield, while MSTR has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.
What is the difference between MSTR and MTYY?
MSTR (Strategy Inc.) is a stock built around software exposure, while MTYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST MSTR ETF) tracks Strategy (MSTR) with a crypto approach. MTYY is issued by GraniteShares.
Can I hold both MSTR and MTYY?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Which has lower fees, MSTR or MTYY?
MTYY charges a 1.07% expense ratio. MSTR is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.
How much income does $10,000 in MSTR vs MTYY generate?
At current distribution rates, MSTR does not pay distributions, so there is no cash income to estimate. $10,000 in MTYY would pay about $4,047.00 a year (about $77.83 per weekly distribution).
Which has performed better historically, MSTR or MTYY?
MSTR has outpaced MTYY over the trailing twelve months, posting a -49.29% total return against -58.46%. Measured from Sep 2025 — the start of shared available history — MSTR has compounded at -56.51% a year versus -66.68% for MTYY. MTYY has been the steadier holding, though — annualized volatility of 28.7% against 81.3% for MSTR. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
Popular comparisons
MSTR vs MTYY — at a glance
Generated October 31, 2026.
Overview
MSTR is a publicly traded software company that also operates a significant corporate Bitcoin treasury strategy.
How they differ
MSTR is a stock priced at $128.93 with a 3.571 beta, meaning it amplifies overall market moves by roughly 3.6 times.
Who each is best for
MSTR: Investors seeking long-term capital appreciation from both enterprise software operations and corporate Bitcoin accumulation, with high risk tolerance for tech and crypto volatility and no need for current income.
Key risks to know
- High volatility in the underlying. MSTR's 3.571 beta signals outsized sensitivity to market moves.
- Put-spread assignment and forced liquidity events. If MSTR falls sharply, MTYY's short puts may move in-the-money and face assignment. The ETF must manage forced share delivery and buy-back costs, which can strain a small asset base and disrupt distributions.
- Distribution yield and principal preservation. MTYY's 40.47% annualized yield raises a question: whether distributions are funded primarily by option premium capture or whether they rely on return-of-capital treatment that may erode principal over time if underlying holdings don't appreciate sufficiently. If implied volatility contracts or MSTR rallies past the short strikes, the income stream can diminish.
Bottom line
MSTR suits investors who want growth exposure to software operations and Bitcoin treasury accumulation without current distributions. If you prioritize long-term capital appreciation and can tolerate tech-crypto volatility, MSTR's direct ownership applies; if you need regular income and understand options mechanics and the risks of a small fund, MTYY presents a different payoff structure. Past performance does not predict future results, and either position carries significant risk.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.