DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

MTUM vs SPMO: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 15, 2026

ETFs481
Total AUM$4450B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

iShares is one of the largest ETF providers globally, known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of exchange-traded funds across multiple asset classes and investment strategies. The company operates 215 funds spanning 15 distinct families, including popular offerings in dividend income, covered call strategies, bonds, equities, ESG-focused investments, and factor-based approaches, with widely-held tickers like AGG (bond), ACWI (global equity), and AOA (allocation). iShares is characterized by its comprehensive fund ecosystem that serves both core portfolio holdings and specialized investment strategies, making it a prominent player for investors seeking both traditional and alternative income-generating ETF solutions.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on MTUM.

ETFs256
Total AUM$971B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Invesco is a major player in the ETF space known for offering a broad, diversified lineup of 71 funds spanning multiple investment themes and strategies. Their portfolio spans income-focused funds, factor-based equity strategies, commodity exposure, digital assets, ESG investing, and the popular Invesco QQQ family tracking the Nasdaq-100, serving both income-seeking and growth-oriented investors. The issuer is particularly recognized for specialized offerings like BulletShares (laddered bond funds), sector rotation strategies, and thematic investing options, making it a comprehensive choice for investors seeking varied exposures beyond traditional index funds.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on SPMO.

Side-by-side snapshot

MTUMSPMO
Full nameiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETFInvesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF
IssueriSharesInvesco
Last Close$319.76 as of July 15, 2026$152.86 as of July 15, 2026
Distribution yield0.45%0.64%
Distribution Safety Score 6972
Expense ratio0.15%0.13%
AUM$27.0B$20.3B
Distribution frequencyQuarterlyQuarterly
Underlying indexMSCI USA Momentum SR Variant IndexS&P 500 Momentum Index
ObjectiveTrack the MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index, emphasizing U.S. stocks with high momentum characteristics.Track the S&P 500 Momentum Index, providing factor exposure to the highest momentum names within the S&P 500.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/16/201310/09/2015
Beta1.241.28
Last dividend$0.3580$0.2450
Ex-dividend date06/15/202606/22/2026

Bottom lineMTUM and SPMO are nearly interchangeable — both offer very similar large cap momentum exposure with very similar cost and risk. The clearest tie-breaker is cost: SPMO is cheaper at 0.13% vs 0.15%.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Quick verdict

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) and SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) are both quarterly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

SPMO offers the higher yield at 0.64% vs 0.45% for MTUM. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

SPMO is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.13% compared to 0.15%.

They track different benchmarks: MTUM is linked to MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index, which means their performance drivers differ.

MTUM is the larger fund by assets ($27.0B), which generally means tighter spreads and better liquidity.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, MTUM would generate roughly $3.75/month, while SPMO would produce $5.33/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.

MTUM yield0.45%
SPMO yield0.64%
Monthly diff on $10K$1.58

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, MTUM would cost approximately $150 in fees vs $130 for SPMO (simplified, not compounded). The $20.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

MTUM ER0.15%
SPMO ER0.13%

Strategy & risk

MTUM tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index with an index approach, while SPMO tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index with an index approach. Beta is 1.24 for MTUM and 1.28 for SPMO, indicating MTUM is less volatile relative to the market.

MTUM beta1.24
SPMO beta1.28

Fund details

MTUM is managed by iShares (launched 04/16/2013) with $27.0B in assets. SPMO is managed by Invesco (launched 10/09/2015) with $20.3B in assets.

MTUM AUM$27.0B
SPMO AUM$20.3B

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Is MTUM or SPMO better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. SPMO currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between MTUM and SPMO?

MTUM (iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF) tracks MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index with an index approach, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) tracks S&P 500 Momentum Index with an index approach. They are issued by iShares and Invesco respectively.

Can I hold both MTUM and SPMO?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, MTUM or SPMO?

MTUM has an expense ratio of 0.15% while SPMO charges 0.13%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in MTUM vs SPMO generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in MTUM would generate roughly $3.75 per month ($45.00 annually). The same in SPMO would produce about $5.33 per month ($64.00 annually).

More comparisons to explore

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.