DV
Dividend Vision

Security Comparison

NFLW vs NFLX: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF and Netflix, Inc. covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 21, 2026

ETFs53
Total AUM$34.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on NFLW.

Side-by-side snapshot

NFLWNFLX
Full nameRoundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETFNetflix, Inc.
IssuerRoundhill Investments
Last Close$14.87 as of July 21, 2026$67.60 as of July 21, 2026
Distribution yield31.14%
Distribution Safety Score™ 35
Expense ratio1.00%
AUM$6.43M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyNone
Underlying indexNetflix (NFLX)
ObjectiveNFLW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Netflix before fees.Provides subscription-based streaming entertainment services offering TV series, documentaries, feature films, and games across a wide variety of genres and languages worldwide.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date06/18/2025N/A
Beta1.517
Last dividend$0.0890
Ex-dividend date07/20/2026

Bottom lineChoose NFLW if you want higher current income (31.14% while NFLX makes no distribution). Choose NFLX if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each security at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these securities to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

NFLW has lagged NFLX over the trailing twelve months, posting a -54.93% total return against -45.19%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NFLX has compounded at -42.01% a year versus -51.69% for NFLW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Jun 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
NFLW-33.62%-54.93%-51.69%41.5%-2.04-2.58-56.0%
NFLX-25.71%-45.19%-42.01%34.9%-1.87-2.38-46.5%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 20, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 2025” measures every fund from June 18, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) is an ETF, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock — they take fundamentally different approaches.

NFLW currently shows a 31.14% distribution yield. NFLX has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, NFLW would generate roughly $259.50/month, while NFLX has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, at current distribution rates.

NFLW yield31.14%
NFLX yield

Cost & efficiency

NFLW charges a 1.00% expense ratio — roughly $1,000 over 10 years on $10,000 (simplified, not compounded). NFLX is a stock, not a fund, so it charges no expense ratio.

NFLW ER1.00%

Strategy & risk

NFLW tracks Netflix (NFLX) with a leverage approach, while NFLX is a stock.

NFLW beta
NFLX beta1.517

Security details

NFLW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 06/18/2025) with $6.43M in assets. NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock.

NFLW AUM$6.43M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

Which of NFLW or NFLX pays more dividend income?

NFLW currently reports a distribution yield, while NFLX has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between NFLW and NFLX?

NFLW (Roundhill NFLX WeeklyPay ETF) tracks Netflix (NFLX) with a leverage approach, while NFLX (Netflix, Inc.) is a stock. They are issued by Roundhill Investments and — respectively.

Can I hold both NFLW and NFLX?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Which has lower fees, NFLW or NFLX?

NFLW charges a 1.00% expense ratio. NFLX is a stock, not a fund, so it has no expense ratio — owning it directly costs nothing in ongoing fund fees.

How much income does $10,000 in NFLW vs NFLX generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in NFLW would generate roughly $259.50 per month ($3,114.00 annually). NFLX has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available.

Which has performed better historically, NFLW or NFLX?

NFLW has lagged NFLX over the trailing twelve months, posting a -54.93% total return against -45.19%. Measured from Jun 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — NFLX has compounded at -42.01% a year versus -51.69% for NFLW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

NFLW vs NFLX — at a glance

Generated July 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

NFLW is a leveraged, weekly-income ETF tracking Netflix's stock at 120% of its total return while paying distributions weekly; NFLX is Netflix's common stock itself, paying no dividend. The core distinction is that NFLW uses financial engineering to amplify Netflix's price movement and manufacture income through options and leverage, while NFLX is straightforward equity exposure with no yield component.

How they differ

NFLW's defining feature is its synthetic-income structure: it targets 120% of Netflix's weekly return through a derivatives strategy, then distributes a 58.60% annual rate paid every seven days. That's functionally a levered bet on Netflix with forced-distribution mechanics that likely require substantial return-of-capital treatment; NFLX offers no distributions at all and is pure price appreciation.

Second, beta tells a story. NFLX reports a beta of 1.517, confirming it's a high-growth, high-volatility streaming play. NFLW reports a beta of 0.0, which reflects its derivatives-based construction rather than traditional market sensitivity—this is synthetic exposure, not a leveraged equity fund in the conventional sense.

Third, the scale mismatch. NFLX is a $2+ trillion market-cap household name; NFLW is a $13.2M niche product that inception in June 2025 makes it brand new. NFLW's 1.00% expense ratio sits atop the cost of managing its options overlay, while NFLX has no fund wrapper or distribution-management drag.

Who each is best for

NFLX: Fits investors who want to own Netflix as a growth equity stake with no income requirements and are comfortable holding a volatile, single-name streaming position over a long time horizon.

NFLW: Fits income-focused traders attracted to weekly cash payouts from a Netflix-linked synthetic structure and who understand that high distribution rates in levered, options-based funds typically require return-of-capital and carry elevated tail risk.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at ultra-high distribution yields. A 58.60% annual payout rate on a $16.70 share price far exceeds realistic earnings power or price appreciation, signaling that distributions will systematically erode principal via return of capital and leverage drag over time.
  • Options and leverage complexity. NFLW's 120% leverage target and weekly rebalancing rely on derivatives positions that can be destabilized by gap moves, volatility spikes, or liquidity events in the underlying Netflix contract—especially at small AUM where hedging is expensive.
  • Extreme concentration and single-stock risk. Both funds are fully exposed to Netflix, but NFLW amplifies that bet to 120%, meaning Netflix-specific catalysts (subscriber weakness, competition, regulatory action, earnings misses) hit twice as hard as owning the stock outright.
  • Tracking decay and roll costs. Weekly rebalancing to maintain 120% leverage and weekly options management will incur recurring slippage relative to the target return, particularly in choppy or low-volume periods.
  • Liquidity and redemption risk. At $13.2M in AUM and inception just weeks old, NFLW may face thin secondary-market spreads and may be forced to hold expensive hedges during stress events, potentially widening the NAV-to-price gap.

Bottom line

NFLX suits investors seeking pure Netflix equity exposure without income, accepting the volatility that comes with a 1.517 beta growth stock. NFLW appeals to traders hunting weekly cash payouts, but the 58.60% distribution yield and leverage mechanics are red flags that principal erosion and options-based drag will likely dominate returns over any meaningful holding period. The choice depends on whether you're after equity appreciation or synthetic income—and whether you accept the embedded costs and complexity NFLW imposes to chase it.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each security fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.