DV
Dividend Vision

REIT Comparison

O vs STAG: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Realty Income Corporation and STAG Industrial covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated October 2, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • OInvestors who want higher current income (6.03% vs 4.30% for STAG).
  • STAGInvestors who want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

O has lagged STAG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -5.54% total return against 5.03%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: STAG has compounded at 8.99% a year, against 3.28% for O. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolYTD cumulative1Y cumulative3Y annualized5Y annualized10Y annualizedSince Apr 2011Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
O-1.74%-5.54%9.28%1.92%3.28%8.10%18.1%0.240.34-19.3%
STAG0.75%5.03%6.34%2.15%8.99%13.09%21.5%0.080.11-24.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of October 2, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Apr 2011” measures every fund from April 15, 2011 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricOSTAG
Full nameRealty Income CorporationSTAG Industrial
IssuerRealty IncomeSTAG Industrial
Last Close$54.13 as of October 2, 2026$36.05 as of October 2, 2026
Distribution rate6.03%4.30%
Trailing 12-month yield6.00%4.26%
Distribution Safety Score™ 10079
Safety-Adjusted Yield 6.03%3.40%
Expense ratio——
AUM——
Distribution frequencyMonthlyQuarterly
Underlying index——
ObjectiveA real estate investment trust that invests in freestanding, single-tenant commercial properties subject to long-term net lease agreements. Known as "The Monthly Dividend Company," Realty Income has a long track record of monthly dividend payments and consistent dividend growth.A real estate investment trust focused on income-producing properties.
Asset classReal EstateReal Estate
Inception dateN/AN/A
Beta0.7120.961
Last dividend$0.272 declared, pays 10/15/2026$0.3875 declared, pays 10/15/2026
Ex-dividend date09/30/202609/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose O if you want higher current income (6.03% vs 4.30% for STAG). Choose STAG if you want real-estate income and inflation sensitivity.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each real estate investment trust at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these REITs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

O (Realty Income Corporation) and STAG (STAG Industrial) are both dividend-paying real estate investment trusts (REITs), but they take different approaches.

O offers the higher yield at 6.03% vs 4.30% for STAG. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, O would generate roughly $50.25 cash per distribution, while STAG would produce $107.50 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates.

O yield6.03%
STAG yield4.30%
Cash diff on $10K$57.25

Strategy & risk

O is a real estate investment trust built around net lease REIT exposure, while STAG is a real estate investment trust built around diversified REIT exposure. Beta is 0.712 for O and 0.961 for STAG, making O the less volatile of the two by this measure.

O beta0.712
STAG beta0.961

Security details

O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust. STAG (STAG Industrial) is a real estate investment trust.

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for O and STAG?

O currently distributes 6.03% and STAG 4.30%, based on fund data updated October 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is O or STAG better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. O currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between O and STAG?

O (Realty Income Corporation) is a real estate investment trust built around net lease REIT exposure, while STAG (STAG Industrial) is a real estate investment trust built around diversified REIT exposure. They are issued by Realty Income and STAG Industrial respectively.

Can I hold both O and STAG?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is O or STAG safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — O scores 100, STAG scores 79, so O's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. O has also shown lower price volatility (beta 0.71 vs 0.96 for STAG). No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.

How much income does $10,000 in O vs STAG generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in O would generate roughly $50.25 cash per distribution ($603.00 annually). The same in STAG would produce about $107.50 cash per distribution ($430.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, O or STAG?

O has lagged STAG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -5.54% total return against 5.03%. The lead holds up over 10 years too: STAG has compounded at 8.99% a year, against 3.28% for O. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

O vs STAG — at a glance

Generated October 3, 2026.

Overview

O and STAG are both real estate investment trusts that own commercial properties and pay regular distributions to shareholders. O focuses exclusively on freestanding, single-tenant properties under long-term net leases, while STAG holds a diversified portfolio of income-producing properties.

How they differ

O's net lease strategy concentrates its portfolio on single-tenant freestanding buildings where tenants bear most operating costs, whereas STAG diversifies across property types and structures. O has a longer operating history, having commenced in 10/18/1994, while STAG emerged later. The two also differ in volatility: O shows a beta of 0.712, suggesting lower correlation to broad market swings, while STAG's 0.961 beta runs closer to market movement.

Who each is best for

O: Fits investors drawn to monthly income cadence and willing to accept concentrated net lease exposure for a higher yield. The long dividend-growth track record appeals to those seeking stability and predictable distributions rather than capital appreciation.

STAG: Designed for investors prioritizing diversified real estate exposure and quarterly distribution frequency. Suits those who want property-level diversity without the premium yield, and who are comfortable with larger market beta.

Key risks to know

  • Net lease concentration (O): Tenant credit quality and lease terms drive cash flow, making O vulnerable if major tenants face distress or if lease renewal becomes more difficult in a weakening economy. A shift in tenant creditworthiness would directly threaten distribution sustainability.
  • Yield sustainability: O's 6.03% distribution rate is material relative to typical net lease cap rates; any significant rise in discount rates or widening of cap rate spreads could pressure NAV and dividend-growth trajectory.
  • Market beta divergence: STAG's 0.961 beta indicates sensitivity to equity market cycles; in downturns, industrial and diversified property values may decline faster than O's net lease model, which contractually locks in tenant rent.
  • Property-type risk: STAG's diversified portfolio provides stability across cycles, but concentration in any single property type (e.g., industrial, office) creates exposure to sector-specific headwinds that O's net lease tenants partially insulate against through contractual rent floors.
  • Interest rate sensitivity: Both REITs are sensitive to rising discount rates, but O's longer lease terms lock in economics further into the future, while STAG faces more frequent repricing and refinancing risk as properties turnover. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each real estate investment trust fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.