DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

ODTE vs RDTY: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF and YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Updated September 30, 2026

How these figures are calculated: methodology.

Best for

  • ODTEInvestors who are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout.
  • RDTYInvestors who want to maximize current income — roughly 29.15%, generated by selling options premium.

Jump to the side-by-side numbers

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

100% reinvested · ex-date convention. Period returns use this fixed assumption, independent of chart settings. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year.

ODTE has lagged RDTY over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 5.74% total return against 14.05%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

Total return and risk statistics by fund. Each row is one fund; each column is one period or statistic.
SymbolSince Apr 2026Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
ODTE5.74%13.6%0.510.71-7.2%
RDTY14.05%16.3%1.372.12-6.6%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date (a modeling convention, not the cash-settlement date), split-adjusted, as of September 30, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative period returns; 3Y, 5Y, and 10Y are annualized. The shared Since-start window is annualized only when it covers at least one year. “Since Apr 2026” measures every fund from April 6, 2026 — the start of shared available history — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the shared window since Apr 2026. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the shared window since Apr 2026) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Distribution rate, SEC yield and return of capital

MetricODTERDTY
Forward distribution rate14.19%29.15%
Trailing 12-month yield6.97%44.98%
30-day SEC yield—-0.77%
Return of capital—0.00%

Total return (price change plus reinvested distributions) is the Total returns section above. Return of capital is the share of a recent distribution that was not income. A 30-day SEC yield can sit far from the headline distribution rate; both numbers are the fund's own published fields.

Total return against the stated underlying is on ODTE vs SPX, NDX, RTY, RDTY vs IWM.

Side-by-side snapshot

Side-by-side snapshot. Each row is one metric; each column is one fund.
MetricODTERDTY
Full nameVegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETFYieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
IssuerVegaSharesYieldMax
Underlying indexS&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000Russell 2000
Last Close$24.92 as of September 30, 2026$34.58 as of September 30, 2026
Distribution rate14.19%29.15%
Trailing 12-month yield6.97%44.98%
30-day SEC yield—-0.77%
Distribution Safety Score™ 5059
Safety-Adjusted Yield —17.20%
Expense ratio0.76%1.73%
AUM$2.76M$17.5M
Distribution frequencyWeeklyWeekly
ObjectiveSeeks weekly income by investing at least 80% of net assets in the constituents of the S&P 500, Nasdaq-100 and Russell 2000 indices, or instruments linked to them, alongside an options premium strategy.Seeks weekly income through a synthetic covered call strategy that provides exposure to the price return of the Russell 2000 Index while selling call options on the index or on ETFs that track it.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception date04/03/202603/05/2025
Beta—1.1572
Last dividend$0.068$0.1938 declared, pays 10/01/2026
Ex-dividend date09/24/202609/30/2026

Bottom lineChoose ODTE if you are comfortable trading away most upside for a large, steady payout. Choose RDTY if you want to maximize current income — roughly 29.15%, generated by selling options premium. ODTE and RDTY both use option or derivative overlays. Their tradeoff is the underlying exposure, how each option strategy is implemented, and the yield each targets; either overlay can limit upside participation, so neither offers uncapped price exposure.

How the risk works

Read this before the income numbers below: the strategy mechanics on this page shape what those payouts can cost you.

  • Capped upside and premium dependence. ODTE and RDTY generate income by selling options, which trades away part of a strong rally in exchange for premium. Distributions can include return of capital, and a payout the underlying assets cannot sustain shows up as NAV erosion over time — the big yield number is not free.

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

ETFs6
Total AUM$64.4M

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

VegaShares specializes in options-based and thematic ETFs designed to generate income and capitalize on emerging trends. The issuer's lineup spans income-focused strategies, including covered call funds, alongside thematic offerings that target specific market segments and innovation themes. VegaShares serves investors seeking alternative approaches to traditional equity exposure, with a concentrated portfolio of strategically named funds addressing both income generation and sector-specific growth opportunities.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on ODTE.

ETFs62
Total AUM$10.1B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

YieldMax is known for specializing in options-based and income-focused ETFs that emphasize yield generation through covered call strategies and other income-producing methodologies. The firm operates a diverse lineup of 63 funds organized across multiple families including covered call strategies, 0DTE (zero days to expiration) options, double distribution approaches, and various target-date and performance-based portfolios designed to generate regular distributions. Notable offerings span popular underlying assets like major technology stocks and broad market indices, with a particular emphasis on providing enhanced income solutions for investors seeking regular cash flows through options strategies and other tactical approaches.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on RDTY.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.

Quick verdict

ODTE (VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF) and RDTY (YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) are both weekly-pay dividend ETFs, but they take different approaches.

RDTY offers the higher yield at 29.15% vs 14.19% for ODTE. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.

ODTE is cheaper with an expense ratio of 0.76% compared to 1.73%.

They have different reference exposures: ODTE is linked to S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 while RDTY is linked to Russell 2000, which means their performance drivers differ.

RDTY is the larger fund by assets ($17.5M), but assets alone do not establish trading costs or liquidity.

Who should choose each?

Choose ODTE

VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF

  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.
  • Want to keep costs low — a 0.76% expense ratio vs 1.73% for RDTY.

Choose RDTY

YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF

  • Want to maximize current income — RDTY distributes roughly 29.15% from selling options premium, vs 14.19% for ODTE.
  • Are comfortable with an options-income strategy — a large payout in exchange for capped upside.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, ODTE would generate roughly $27.29 cash per distribution, while RDTY would produce $56.06 cash per distribution, at current distribution rates. Both pay weekly distributions.

ODTE yield14.19%
RDTY yield29.15%
Cash diff on $10K$28.77

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, ODTE would cost approximately $760 in fees vs $1,730 for RDTY (simplified, not compounded). The $970.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

ODTE ER0.76%
RDTY ER1.73%

Strategy & risk

ODTE tracks S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 with a covered call approach, while RDTY tracks Russell 2000 with a covered call approach.

ODTE beta—
RDTY beta1.1572

Fund details

ODTE is managed by VegaShares (launched 04/03/2026) with $2.76M in assets. RDTY is managed by YieldMax (launched 03/05/2025) with $17.5M in assets.

ODTE AUM$2.76M
RDTY AUM$17.5M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

What is the current distribution rate for ODTE and RDTY?

ODTE currently distributes 14.19% and RDTY 29.15%, based on fund data updated September 2026. Distribution rate moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.

Is ODTE or RDTY better for dividend income?

It depends on your goals. RDTY currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.

What is the difference between ODTE and RDTY?

ODTE (VegaShares SPX NDX RTY Premium Income ETF) tracks S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, Russell 2000 with a covered call approach, while RDTY (YieldMax R2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) tracks Russell 2000 with a covered call approach. They are issued by VegaShares and YieldMax respectively.

Can I hold both ODTE and RDTY?

Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.

Is ODTE or RDTY safer?

By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — RDTY scores 59, ODTE scores 50, so RDTY's payout currently looks the more resilient of the two. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee, and the leverage, options-income, or crypto caveats flagged on this page apply regardless of score.

Which has lower fees, ODTE or RDTY?

ODTE has an expense ratio of 0.76% while RDTY charges 1.73%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in ODTE vs RDTY generate?

At current rates, $10,000 in ODTE would generate roughly $27.29 cash per distribution ($1,419.00 annually). The same in RDTY would produce about $56.06 cash per distribution ($2,915.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, ODTE or RDTY?

ODTE has lagged RDTY over the shared window since Apr 2026, posting a 5.74% total return against 14.05%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

ODTE vs RDTY — at a glance

Generated September 27, 2026.

Figures quoted in this analysis are from its generation date and may lag the live snapshot table above, which always shows the latest data.

Overview

ODTE and RDTY are both ETFs that pursue weekly income through zero-days-to-expiration (0DTE) options strategies, but they differ fundamentally in scope and leverage. ODTE blends broad U.S. equity exposure—S&P 500, Nasdaq-100, and Russell 2000—with an options overlay, while RDTY isolates Russell 2000 small-cap exposure and pairs it with a synthetic covered call strategy. The key distinction: ODTE diversifies across three index families; RDTY concentrates on small caps and relies on synthetic call sales to amplify yield.

How they differ

RDTY's 29.15% distribution rate exceeds ODTE's 14.19% by more than half. RDTY's 1.73% expense ratio is also substantially higher than ODTE's 0.76%, a difference that narrows net yield but reflects more active synthetic-call management. ODTE has been live since 04/03/2026 with $2.76M in assets, while RDTY launched 1 year with $17.5M—a sevenfold AUM advantage that may reflect either earlier fund maturity or stronger investor appetite for concentrated small-cap yield.

Who each is best for

ODTE: Fits investors seeking diversified exposure across large-cap, mega-cap growth, and small-cap segments while collecting weekly option premium, and who tolerate newer, smaller fund structures and weekly distribution reinvestment.

RDTY: Fits investors with a tactical allocation to small-cap volatility who view the Russell 2000's outsized moves as an opportunity to harvest call premium, accept higher fees, and are comfortable with concentrated single-index exposure in pursuit of elevated weekly distributions.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at extreme distribution yields. RDTY's 29.15% annualized rate—paid weekly—implies returns of roughly 50 basis points per week. If Russell 2000 price appreciation fails to cover this payout velocity, NAV will decline over time, a dynamic particularly acute in flat or down markets.
  • 0DTE options repricing and liquidity risk. Both funds roll positions weekly into expiration, creating reinvestment risk at volatile market close prices. Periods of elevated small-cap realized volatility (where RDTY concentrates) can spike option premiums sharply upward or, conversely, dry up supply at acceptable strikes if market dislocations occur.
  • Fund maturity and asset-base sustainability. RDTY's $17.5M AUM is modest; if redemptions accelerate, per-share cost absorption could deteriorate. ODTE's $2.76M base is even thinner and raises structural questions about long-term viability and operational cost coverage.
  • Synthetic call structure opacity in RDTY. The mechanism for achieving Russell 2000 price exposure while selling calls synthetically introduces counterparty and liquidity layering that differs from a simple covered call on holdings; basis slippage between the synthetic exposure and actual index performance is not transparent to the investor.

Bottom line

If you want broad U.S. equity diversification alongside moderate weekly income, ODTE spreads risk across three indices and charges lower fees; if you are betting on small-cap volatility and willing to pay for an aggressive call-selling program, RDTY offers substantially higher yield at the cost of single-index concentration and higher expenses. Both funds are thinly capitalized and trading at extreme payout rates that rely on sustained option premium and low NAV erosion—neither characteristic is assured. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Learn the method

The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.

These comparisons follow the Dividend Vision methodology.