Stock Comparison
PEP vs PG: Two Consumer Companies, Not Two Funds
A head-to-head of PepsiCo and Procter & Gamble covering the businesses, payout schedule, and why they are not interchangeable.
Data updated August 24, 2026
Best for
- PEPInvestors who want higher current income (4.01% vs 3.00% for PG).
- PGInvestors who want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
Visual comparison
Key metrics
Projected income on $10K
Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.
Total returns
PEP has outpaced PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.07% total return against -6.63%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — PG has compounded at 8.15% a year, ahead of PEP at 5.98%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.
| Symbol | YTD | 1Y | 3Y | 5Y | 10Y | Since Jun 1972 | Volatility | Sharpe | Sortino | Max drawdown |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PEP | 1.78% | -2.07% | -3.79% | 0.99% | 5.98% | 11.59% | 20.0% | -0.42 | -0.59 | -27.5% |
| PG | 4.31% | -6.63% | 1.05% | 2.55% | 8.15% | 10.42% | 17.8% | -0.19 | -0.26 | -21.1% |
Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of August 21, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Jun 1972” measures every fund from June 1, 1972 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the trailing 3 years. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the trailing 3 years) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.
Side-by-side snapshot
| Metric |  PEP |  PG |
|---|---|---|
| Full name | PepsiCo, Inc. | The Procter & Gamble Company |
| Issuer | — | — |
| Last Close | $143.48 as of August 24, 2026 | $144.68 as of August 24, 2026 |
| Distribution yield | 4.01% | 3.00% |
| Distribution Safety Score™ | 99 | 99 |
| Expense ratio | — | — |
| AUM | — | — |
| Distribution frequency | Quarterly | Quarterly |
| Underlying index | — | — |
| Objective | Manufactures, markets, distributes, and sells beverages and convenient foods worldwide under brands including Pepsi, Lay's, Gatorade, and Quaker. | Provides branded consumer packaged goods including beauty, grooming, health care, fabric care, and home care products worldwide. |
| Asset class | Equity | Equity |
| Inception date | N/A | N/A |
| Beta | 0.361 | 0.377 |
| Last dividend | $1.4800 | $1.0890 |
| Ex-dividend date | 09/04/2026 | 07/24/2026 |
Bottom lineChoose PEP if you want higher current income (4.01% vs 3.00% for PG). Choose PG if you want direct ownership of the underlying business, with no fund wrapper or management fee.
PEP vs PG: two consumer companies
Common stocks, not funds. Product mix and payout history matter more than a one-date yield gap.
| PEP | PG | |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | PepsiCo common stock | Procter & Gamble common stock |
| Business | Beverages and snacks | Household and consumer products |
| Distribution yield | 4.01% | 3.00% |
Income calculator
See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each stock at current yields.
Want to go deeper?
Add these stocks to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — free to start, no credit card.
Quick verdict
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) and PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) are both quarterly-pay dividend-paying stocks, but they take different approaches.
PEP offers the higher yield at 4.01% vs 3.00% for PG. A higher yield means more current income per dollar invested, though it may come with different risk characteristics.
Still deciding? Track PEP & PG for free
Create a free Dividend Vision account to keep them on a watchlist, get notified when they declare dividends, and see how much income they would add to your portfolio.
Deep dive
Yield & income
On a $10,000 investment, PEP would generate roughly $33.42/month, while PG would produce $25.00/month, at current distribution rates. Both pay quarterly distributions.
Strategy & risk
PEP is a stock built around beverages & snacks exposure, while PG is a stock built around consumer products exposure. Beta is 0.361 for PEP and 0.377 for PG — effectively similar market sensitivity.
Security details
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a stock. PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock.
Enjoyed this page?
Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend investments.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between PEP and PG?
Both are common stocks, not funds. PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a beverages and snacks company. PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a household and consumer-products company. Each pays a quarterly dividend — 4.01% versus 3.00% as of August 2026. Neither has a fund expense ratio. A yield gap is not the same as a better business. Compare the product mix and payout history, not two wrappers.
What is the current distribution yield for PEP and PG?
PEP currently distributes 4.01% and PG 3.00%, based on fund data updated August 2026. Distribution yield moves with both the payout and the share price, so check the as-of date before relying on either figure.
Is PEP or PG better for dividend income?
It depends on your goals. PEP currently offers the higher distribution yield, which means more income per dollar invested. However, a lower-yield fund may offer better total return or lower volatility. Consider your time horizon and risk tolerance.
What is the difference between PEP and PG?
PEP (PepsiCo, Inc.) is a stock built around beverages & snacks exposure, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock built around consumer products exposure. They are issued by — and — respectively.
Can I hold both PEP and PG?
Yes — nothing prevents holding both. Whether the combination actually diversifies depends on how much the underlying exposures overlap, which isn't fully measurable from the data on this page; review each security's holdings, sector, and strategy before treating them as complementary.
Is PEP or PG safer?
By Dividend Vision's Distribution Safety Score — a rules-based 0–100 estimate of how resilient a distribution looks, where higher is safer — they are effectively tied: PEP scores 99, PG scores 99. Neither has a clear safety edge on that measure. No score makes an investment risk-free — treat this as a screening signal, not a guarantee.
How much income does $10,000 in PEP vs PG generate?
At current rates, $10,000 in PEP would generate roughly $33.42 per month ($401.00 annually). The same in PG would produce about $25.00 per month ($300.00 annually).
Which has performed better historically, PEP or PG?
PEP has outpaced PG over the trailing twelve months, posting a -2.07% total return against -6.63%. The picture flips over 10 years, though — PG has compounded at 8.15% a year, ahead of PEP at 5.98%. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
More comparisons to explore
People also compare PEP with
Popular comparisons
PEP vs PG — at a glance
Generated August 15, 2026.
Overview
PepsiCo and Procter & Gamble are both mature consumer staples stocks with multi-decade dividend-paying histories. PEP manufactures and markets beverages and convenient foods (Pepsi, Lay's, Gatorade, Quaker), while PG produces packaged consumer goods across beauty, grooming, health care, and home care. The key distinction is yield: PEP distributes at 4.10% versus PG's 2.98%, a 112-basis-point spread that reflects different capital allocation philosophies and business model maturity.
How they differ
The largest difference is yield. PEP's 4.10% distribution rate exceeds PG's 2.98% by more than a full percentage point, suggesting PepsiCo returns more cash to shareholders while PG retains more for reinvestment or debt management. Both stocks carry similar defensive characteristics—beta of 0.361 for PEP and 0.377 for PG—indicating both move less than the broader market, though PEP is marginally steadier. PEP's portfolio is narrower, concentrated in beverages and snacks, while PG's spans a broader consumer portfolio including beauty, grooming, health care, and home care, which may translate to different cyclicality and geographic exposure profiles.
Who each is best for
PEP: Fits income-focused investors seeking higher current cash distributions from a mature consumer staples company with relatively low systematic risk and exposure to global beverage and snack consumption trends.
PG: Fits total-return and income-growth investors who prioritize a lower current yield in exchange for a broader consumer goods portfolio and a longer dividend-growth track record, accepting lower near-term income in favor of potential long-term appreciation.
Key risks to know
- Commodity and input cost sensitivity: Both stocks face exposure to commodity price cycles and supply-chain inflation in their respective categories. PEP's beverage and snack business is particularly vulnerable to sugar, corn, and packaging costs; PG's home and personal care products face similar pressures on raw materials and logistics.
- Yield sustainability: PEP's 4.10% yield is substantially higher than PG's 2.98%. Investors should verify that PEP's earnings growth and free cash flow generation support this payout without relying on balance-sheet depletion or slowing growth rates that could force future cuts.
- Cyclical consumer demand: Recession or prolonged consumer spending weakness could pressure both stocks' sales and margins, though staple positioning provides some cushion. PG's broader portfolio may offer marginally more resilience across economic cycles than PEP's focus on beverages and snacks.
- Geographic and regulatory exposure: Both stocks derive significant international revenue; currency fluctuations and regulatory shifts in key markets (Europe, emerging markets) can affect earnings translation and profitability.
Bottom line
If you prioritize current income, PEP's 4.10% yield stands out; if you value a lower payout ratio and potential for dividend growth, PG's 2.98% yield leaves more room for raises. Both offer defensive equity exposure with low systematic risk—the choice hinges on whether your portfolio needs income now or growth potential later. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.
Learn the method
The metrics behind this comparison, explained in the Academy.
Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio
See how each stock fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.