DV
Dividend Vision

ETF Comparison

PLTR vs PLTW: Which Is the Better Pick in 2026?

A head-to-head comparison of Palantir Technologies Inc. and Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF covering yield, cost, risk, and income potential.

Data updated July 8, 2026

Bottom lineChoose PLTR if you want broad equity exposure. Choose PLTW if you want higher current income (19.75% while PLTR makes no distribution).

ETFs55
Total AUM$28.0B

ETFs and AUM reflect what Dividend Vision tracks — the issuer's full lineup may be larger.

Roundhill Investments is known for offering specialized ETFs that focus on income generation and thematic investing strategies. The firm operates 42 funds across five distinct families—Core, HALO, Income, Thematic, and WeeklyPay—with a particular emphasis on covered call strategies and weekly distribution products designed to generate regular cash flows. Notable offerings include ticker symbols like AAPW, AMDW, and AMZW (which employ covered call strategies on major technology stocks), along with thematic funds covering areas such as artificial intelligence (CHAT), cryptocurrency mining (DRAM), and other innovative sectors.

See our curated list of related YouTube videos on PLTW.

Side-by-side snapshot

PLTRPLTW
Full namePalantir Technologies Inc.Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
IssuerRoundhill Investments
Last Close$134.37 as of July 8, 2026$19.48 as of July 8, 2026
Distribution yield19.75%
Distribution Safety Score 41
Expense ratio0.99%
AUM$118M
Distribution frequencyNoneWeekly
Underlying indexPalantir (PLTR)
ObjectiveBuilds and deploys software platforms for data integration, analysis, and operations. Serves government and commercial customers with Gotham, Foundry, and Apollo platforms for AI-powered decision making.PLTW targets weekly payouts and 120% of the weekly total return of Palantir Technologies Inc. before fees.
Asset classEquityEquity
Inception dateN/A02/19/2025
Beta1.5622.2021
Last dividend$0.0740
Ex-dividend date07/06/2026

Income calculator

See how much monthly income a hypothetical investment would generate in each ETF at current yields.

Want to go deeper?

Add these ETFs to a sample portfolio and forecast your dividend income over 5+ years — no signup required.

Visual comparison

Key metrics

Projected income on $10K

Projections assume the current yield and share price remain constant. Actual results will vary.

Total returns

PLTR has outpaced PLTW over the trailing twelve months, posting a -3.41% total return against -14.65%. Measured from Feb 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — PLTR has compounded at 14.09% a year versus 4.25% for PLTW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested.

SymbolYTD1YSince Feb 2025Volatility Sharpe Sortino Max drawdown
PLTR-19.95%-3.41%14.09%51.9%-0.15-0.21-48.2%
PLTW-29.42%-14.65%4.25%62.2%-0.33-0.44-57.8%

Total return with all distributions reinvested on the ex-dividend date, split-adjusted, as of July 7, 2026. YTD and 1Y are cumulative; longer windows are annualized. “Since Feb 2025” measures every fund from February 19, 2025 — the youngest fund's first trading day — so all funds share one comparison window. Volatility is the annualized standard deviation of daily total returns over the past year. Sharpe and Sortino divide the annualized return in excess of the risk-free rate by, respectively, that volatility and the downside deviation (both over the past year) — higher is better. Max drawdown is the largest peak-to-trough total-return decline over the same window — shallower is better.

Quick verdict

PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while PLTW (Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF) is an ETF — they take fundamentally different approaches.

PLTW currently shows a 19.75% distribution yield. PLTR has not yet established a full distribution history, so a comparable yield figure is not available.

Who should choose each?

Choose PLTR

Palantir Technologies Inc.

  • Want broad equity exposure.
  • Prefer lower volatility — a beta of 1.6 vs 2.2 for PLTW.

Choose PLTW

Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF

  • Want higher current income — PLTW yields 19.75% while PLTR makes no distribution.
  • Want broad equity exposure.

Not sure? Use the income calculator and snapshot above to weigh these trade-offs against your own goals.

Deep dive

Yield & income

On a $10,000 investment, PLTR has no reported distribution yield yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available, while PLTW would produce $164.58/month, at current distribution rates.

PLTR yield
PLTW yield19.75%

Cost & efficiency

Over 10 years on $10,000, PLTR would cost approximately $0 in fees vs $990 for PLTW (simplified, not compounded). The $990.00 difference may be offset by yield or performance.

PLTR ER
PLTW ER0.99%

Strategy & risk

PLTR is a stock, while PLTW tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a leverage approach. Beta is 1.562 for PLTR and 2.2021 for PLTW, indicating PLTR is less volatile relative to the market.

PLTR beta1.562
PLTW beta2.2021

Fund details

PLTR is managed by — (launched 09/30/2020) with — in assets. PLTW is managed by Roundhill Investments (launched 02/19/2025) with $118M in assets.

PLTR AUM
PLTW AUM$118M

Enjoyed this page?

Do us a favor — if you found this comparison useful, please share it with a friend researching dividend ETFs.

Frequently asked questions

Which of PLTR or PLTW pays more dividend income?

PLTW currently reports a distribution yield, while PLTR has not yet established a full distribution history. A direct income comparison is not yet meaningful — check back once both funds have published several consecutive distributions.

What is the difference between PLTR and PLTW?

PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock, while PLTW (Roundhill PLTR WeeklyPay ETF) tracks Palantir (PLTR) with a leverage approach. They are issued by — and Roundhill Investments respectively.

Can I hold both PLTR and PLTW?

Yes. Many income investors hold both to diversify across different strategies and underlying indexes. This can reduce concentration risk while maintaining a strong income stream.

Which has lower fees, PLTR or PLTW?

PLTR has an expense ratio of — while PLTW charges 0.99%. Lower fees mean more of your investment returns stay in your pocket over time.

How much income does $10,000 in PLTR vs PLTW generate?

At current rates, PLTR has not established a distribution history yet, so a monthly income estimate is not available. The same in PLTW would produce about $164.58 per month ($1,975.00 annually).

Which has performed better historically, PLTR or PLTW?

PLTR has outpaced PLTW over the trailing twelve months, posting a -3.41% total return against -14.65%. Measured from Feb 2025 — when the younger fund began trading — PLTR has compounded at 14.09% a year versus 4.25% for PLTW. Figures are total returns: price change plus every distribution reinvested. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

More comparisons to explore

PLTR vs PLTW — at a glance

Generated June 2026 from current fund data.

Overview

PLTR is the underlying equity stock: Palantir Technologies, a software company selling data integration and AI analytics platforms to government and commercial customers. PLTW is a leveraged, single-stock ETF that aims to deliver 120% of PLTR's weekly total return, packaged as a weekly income-paying vehicle. The critical difference is structural—PLTR is buy-and-hold equity exposure; PLTW layers leverage, weekly rebalancing, and synthetic income generation on top of the same underlying company.

How they differ

PLTW uses leverage and weekly rebalancing to amplify returns and engineer weekly payouts, while PLTR offers direct, unleveraged equity exposure with no distributions. PLTW's 67.86% annualized distribution rate creates income from a stock that pays no dividend, meaning that payout comes from either embedded derivatives (likely call-selling or synthetic income strategies) or principal draw-down—not from underlying business cash flow. PLTW's beta of 2.2021 reflects both the 1.2x leverage embedded in its strategy and the amplified volatility of weekly rebalancing; PLTR's beta of 1.515 reflects the stock's raw cyclicality against the broader market. At $118M in AUM and a February 2025 inception, PLTW is newly launched and faces liquidity and tracking-error risk that PLTR, as an established public company, does not.

Who each is best for

PLTR: Fits investors seeking growth-oriented exposure to AI and data analytics software without leverage, dividend complications, or rebalancing friction—those comfortable holding an appreciating asset with volatility tied to government spending cycles and commercial AI adoption trends.

PLTW: Fits investors who want weekly cash distributions from a concentrated position in PLTR and accept leverage, weekly rebalancing slippage, and a mechanically complex income-generation structure to achieve that payout frequency.

Key risks to know

  • NAV erosion at high distribution yields. At 67.86% annualized yield, PLTW's distributions likely exceed the underlying stock's expected return, which suggests return-of-capital treatment and gradual erosion of net asset value over time.
  • Leverage amplification and rebalancing drag. The 1.2x leverage plus weekly rebalancing compounds volatility and introduces path-dependent losses; in choppy markets, rebalancing costs can accumulate faster than the amplified return can offset.
  • Single-stock concentration. Both funds expose the investor entirely to PLTR; diversification elsewhere is mandatory. PLTW's elevated beta (2.2021 vs. PLTR's 1.515) means that concentration is further amplified.
  • Newly launched fund with minimal track record. PLTW launched in February 2025, so there is no evidence of how its weekly payout strategy performs across market cycles, rate changes, or PLTR volatility regimes.
  • Synthetic income risk. PLTW's weekly distributions likely derive from options strategies or principal return rather than PLTR's business cash flow; shifts in implied volatility, dividend policy, or index methodology could force changes to payout structure.

Bottom line

If you want undiluted equity upside from Palantir's software business, PLTR offers that directly; if you prioritize regular weekly cash and accept leverage, rebalancing friction, and principal decay as the trade-off, PLTW engineered that structure intentionally. The tradeoff is not between good and bad but between capital appreciation and current income, and the math on PLTW's distribution sustainability should be closely examined. Past performance does not predict future results.

AI-generated analysis for educational purposes only. Verify important details independently; past performance does not guarantee future results.

Still deciding? Compare them against your own portfolio

See how each ETF fits alongside your real holdings — forecast future income, analyze overlap, and gauge risk. Start a free 7-day Dividend Vision trial and make the call with your full portfolio in view.